Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PFBC vs BCAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
PFBC vs BCAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $613M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $499M | $233M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $134M | $63M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 79.4% |
| Operating Margin | 38.0% | 37.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $384M | $72M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $807M | $52M |
PFBC vs BCAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 252.1 | +152.1% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFBC vs BCAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 3.1%
- 256.1% 10Y total return vs BCAL's 133.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
BCAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- PEG 0.36 vs PFBC's 0.51
- NIM 4.2% vs PFBC's 3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs BCAL's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BCAL's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.9% vs PFBC's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% |
PFBC vs BCAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PFBC vs BCAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $499M annually — 2.1x BCAL's $233M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 27.1% (BCAL) to 26.8% (PFBC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $499M | $233M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $191M | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $134M | $63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $167M | $57M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.0% | +79.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +37.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +27.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +24.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PFBC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 8% valuation discount to BCAL's 9.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs PFBC's 0.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $613M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $730M | $633M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.10x | 9.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.91x | 11.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | 0.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.85x | 7.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.92x | 10.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for BCAL. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFBC's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCAL scores 7/9 vs PFBC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$423M | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $807M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $384M | $72M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.88x | 1.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFBC five years ago would be worth $15,664 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,274 for BCAL. Over the past 12 months, BCAL leads with a +32.9% total return vs PFBC's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFBC at 31.3% vs BCAL's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | +32.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.1% | +47.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | +42.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +256.1% | +133.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.3% | +13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFBC and BCAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCAL's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $103.05 | $20.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $79.60 | $14.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 189K |
Analyst Outlook
PFBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PFBC as "Buy" and BCAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for BCAL (target: $22) vs 7.7% for PFBC (target: $102). For income investors, PFBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.15% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.00 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.98 | $0.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.1% | +1.0% |
PFBC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BCAL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PFBC vs BCAL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFBC or BCAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preferred Bank (PFBC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFBC or BCAL?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus Southern California Bancorp at 9. 9x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus Preferred Bank's 0. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFBC or BCAL?
Over the past 5 years, Preferred Bank (PFBC) delivered a total return of +56.
6%, compared to +42. 7% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFBC returned +256. 1% versus BCAL's +133. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFBC or BCAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus Southern California Bancorp's 0. 90β — meaning BCAL is approximately 29% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 49% for Preferred Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFBC or BCAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to 7. 9% for Preferred Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFBC or BCAL?
Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
1% net margin versus 26. 8% for Preferred Bank — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFBC leads at 38. 0% versus 37. 8% for BCAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAL leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PFBC or BCAL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Preferred Bank's 0. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Southern California Bancorp — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCAL: 15. 4% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PFBC or BCAL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).
09Is PFBC or BCAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 3. 1% yield, +256. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +256. 1%, BCAL: +133. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PFBC and BCAL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.