Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs CZWI vs CZNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs CZWI vs CZNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $589M | $2.36B | $4.19B | $203M | $389M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $281M | $867M | $1.89B | $90M | $154M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $169M | $392M | $14M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 66.6% | 72.1% | 67.4% | 54.7% | 65.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | 25.3% | 25.7% | 7.0% | 18.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 10.8x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $258M | $327M | $1.30B | $52M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $185M | $271M | $119M | $46M |
PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs CZWI vs CZNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Financial S… (PFIS) | 100 | 178.2 | +78.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 194.4 | +94.4% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.3 | +186.3% |
| Citizens & Northern… (CZNC) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs CZWI vs CZNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 4.2%
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
- 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
NBTB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.77 vs CZNC's 3.47
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 156.6% 10Y total return vs FULT's 107.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage
CZNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.8x)
- 4.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs NBTB's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs CZWI vs CZNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs CZWI vs CZNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • FULT leads 0 • CZNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 21.0x CZWI's $90M. PFIS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZNC's 15.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $281M | $867M | $1.9B | $90M | $154M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | $241M | $529M | $9M | $30M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $169M | $392M | $14M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $225M | $267M | $11M | $29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.6% | +72.1% | +67.4% | +54.7% | +65.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +25.3% | +25.7% | +7.0% | +18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +19.5% | +20.7% | +16.0% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +25.2% | +15.0% | +11.5% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.1% | +39.5% | +47.2% | +63.0% | -52.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PFIS and FULT and CZNC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 33% valuation discount to CZNC's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.75x vs CZNC's 5.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $589M | $2.4B | $4.2B | $203M | $389M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $789M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $136M | $536M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.02x | 13.57x | 10.48x | 14.41x | 14.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.01x | 10.83x | 10.78x | 11.75x | 8.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.25x | 1.93x | 0.75x | 2.84x | 5.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.93x | 10.38x | 9.86x | 15.24x | 18.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.10x | 2.72x | 2.22x | 2.25x | 2.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.21x | 1.14x | 1.09x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.60x | 10.78x | 14.75x | 19.51x | 12.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFIS delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZNC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZNC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CZNC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +7.8% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +2.0% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +0.6% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 0.28x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | $142M | $1.0B | -$67M | $147M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $185M | $271M | $119M | $46M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $258M | $327M | $1.3B | $52M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.77x | 1.05x | 0.84x | 0.16x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,002 for CZNC. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +42.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.4% vs CZNC's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.5% | +9.6% | +12.9% | +21.3% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.4% | +9.3% | +31.9% | +42.9% | +21.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.5% | +54.5% | +133.8% | +159.5% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.0% | +29.5% | +43.3% | +73.4% | +10.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.0% | +102.2% | +107.7% | +156.6% | +64.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | +15.6% | +32.7% | +37.4% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFIS and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFIS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs CZNC's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.89x | 1.13x | 0.46x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.68 | $46.92 | $22.99 | $22.62 | $24.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.64 | $39.20 | $16.60 | $12.83 | $18.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +96.3% | +94.8% | +93.0% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.0 | 54.2 | 53.2 | 66.5 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 234K | 2.0M | 41K | 38K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and CZNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFIS as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", CZNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.1% upside for FULT (target: $24) vs -4.9% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, CZNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.70% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.00 | $46.00 | $24.00 | — | $23.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +3.2% | +3.5% | +1.8% | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.45 | $1.43 | $0.77 | $0.37 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.6% | +3.1% | +0.1% |
PFIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NBTB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs CZWI vs CZNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC?
On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Citizens & Northern Corporation at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Citizens & Northern Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus Citizens & Northern Corporation's 3. 47x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 4%, compared to +10. 0% for Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +156. 6% versus CZNC's +64. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 146% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 56% for Citizens & Northern Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -13. 6% for Citizens & Northern Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC?
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 15. 2% for Citizens & Northern Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFIS leads at 25. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Citizens & Northern Corporation's 3. 47x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULT: 10. 1% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is PFIS or NBTB or FULT or CZWI or CZNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +156. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +156. 6%, FULT: +107. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PFIS and NBTB and FULT and CZWI and CZNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZNC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.