Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $819M | $2.52B | $1.65B | $4.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $441M | $902M | $676M | $1.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $169M | $80M | $392M |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 73.6% | 49.9% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 24.3% | 16.7% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 11.5x | 10.0x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $260M | $327M | $1.17B | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $185M | $92M | $271M |
PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peapack-Gladstone F… (PGC) | 100 | 246.9 | +146.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 203.3 | +103.3% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 155.7% 10Y total return vs FULT's 114.2%
- +64.7% vs NBTB's +18.3%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
CNOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -15.9%
- 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 12.5x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.82 vs NBTB's 1.64
- NIM 3.2% vs CNOB's 2.5%
- 3.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.7% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
FULT leads 1 • PGC leads 1 • CNOB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and FULT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 4.3x PGC's $441M. FULT is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGC's 8.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $441M | $902M | $676M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $241M | $122M | $529M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $169M | $80M | $392M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $225M | $102M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.1% | +73.6% | +49.9% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +24.3% | +16.7% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +18.8% | +11.9% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +24.9% | +15.1% | +14.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.7% | +39.5% | +53.1% | +47.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 49% valuation discount to CNOB's 22.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs PGC's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $819M | $2.5B | $1.6B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.92x | 14.47x | 22.14x | 11.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.49x | 11.54x | 10.04x | 11.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.43x | 2.06x | — | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.92x | 11.03x | 24.17x | 10.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 2.90x | 2.72x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.29x | 1.05x | 1.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.66x | 11.49x | 16.31x | 15.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGC scores 8/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +9.5% | +5.5% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.1% | +0.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +7.9% | +3.5% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +2.4% | +1.5% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.17x | 0.74x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $251M | $142M | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $185M | $92M | $271M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $260M | $327M | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.32x | 1.05x | 0.39x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PGC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FULT five years ago would be worth $16,107 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,276 for CNOB. Over the past 12 months, PGC leads with a +64.7% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNOB at 29.0% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.8% | +17.6% | +26.9% | +21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.7% | +18.3% | +45.1% | +37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +48.5% | +114.8% | +96.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | +44.4% | +32.8% | +61.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.7% | +108.5% | +139.7% | +114.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.3% | +14.1% | +29.0% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.76x | 1.02x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.57 | $48.27 | $32.87 | $23.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.42 | $39.20 | $21.79 | $16.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +99.8% | +99.7% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 63.1 | 69.9 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 116K | 266K | 328K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PGC as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", FULT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for PGC (target: $49) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.30% vs PGC's 0.43%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $46.00 | $34.00 | $23.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 11 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +3.0% | +1.9% | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 7 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.43 | $0.63 | $0.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +1.5% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). FULT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.
2x versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT?
Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +61.
1%, compared to +32. 8% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGC returned +155. 7% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately 34% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -15. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT?
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
7% net margin versus 8. 5% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 11. 9% for PGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGC: 5. 9% to $49. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 0. 4% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC).
09Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 0% yield, +108. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +108. 5%, PGC: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PGC and NBTB and CNOB and FULT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock. NBTB, CNOB, FULT pay a dividend while PGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.