PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$111.85B
5Y Perf.+392.4%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PH vs CAT vs DE vs EMR vs HON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$416.75B
5Y Perf.+645.6%
DE
Deere & Company
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$157.32B
5Y Perf.+281.5%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$79.02B
5Y Perf.+131.2%
HON
Honeywell International Inc.
Conglomerates
Market Cap$136.91B
5Y Perf.+48.1%
PH vs CAT vs DE vs EMR vs HON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PH | CAT | DE | EMR | HON |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $111.85B | $416.75B | $157.32B | $79.02B | $136.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.99B | $70.75B | $45.88B | $18.32B | $36.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.48B | $9.42B | $4.08B | $2.44B | $4.10B |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 32.5% | 34.7% | 52.7% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 20.9% | 16.6% | 17.0% | 19.8% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | 28.6x | 38.8x | 32.5x | 21.7x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $9.64B | $43.33B | $63.94B | $13.76B | $34.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $467M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $1.54B | $12.49B |
PH vs CAT vs DE vs EMR vs HON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PH
CAT
DE
EMR
HON
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parker-Hannifin Cor… (PH) | 100 | 492.4 | +392.4% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PH vs CAT vs DE vs EMR vs HON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HON leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Parker-Hannifin Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CAT and DE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
The Value Pick
PH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.20 vs HON's 11.18
- 16.6% margin vs DE's 8.9%
- 11.5% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 13.4% vs 7.7%
Best for: valuation efficiency
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs PH's 7.4%
- +181.5% vs HON's +2.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
DE
Deere & Company
The Defensive Pick
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
The Growth Play
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
Best for: growth exposure
HON
Honeywell International Inc.
The Income Pick
HON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- 7.8% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2%
- Lower P/E (20.5x vs 21.7x)
- 2.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HON | 7.8% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2% |
| Value | HON | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 21.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | PH | 16.6% margin vs DE's 8.9% |
| Stability / Safety | DE | Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54 |
| Dividends | HON | 2.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CAT | +181.5% vs HON's +2.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PH | 11.5% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 13.4% vs 7.7% |
PH vs CAT vs DE vs EMR vs HON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
PH vs CAT vs DE vs EMR vs HON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPHLAGGINGEMR
Who Leads Where
PH leads in 2 of 6 categories
HON leads 1 • CAT leads 1 • DE leads 0 • EMR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓EMREmerson Electric Co.
0leads
DEDeere & Company
0leads
HONHoneywell Internation…
1leads
CATCaterpillar Inc.
1leads
PHParker-Hannifin Corpo…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CATvs HONMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PH3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HON3/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PH5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CAT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 3.9x EMR's $18.3B. PH is the more profitable business, keeping 16.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DE's 8.9%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | CATCaterpillar Inc. | DEDeere & Company | EMREmerson Electric … | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21.0B | $70.8B | $45.9B | $18.3B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.1B | $14.0B | $9.5B | $4.7B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.5B | $9.4B | $4.1B | $2.4B | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.7B | $11.4B | $5.5B | $3.1B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +32.5% | +34.7% | +52.7% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +16.6% | +17.0% | +19.8% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +13.3% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +16.2% | +12.0% | +17.0% | +11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +22.2% | +16.3% | +2.9% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +30.2% | -24.1% | +28.2% | -41.9% |
PH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HON leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.4x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 38% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PH offers better value at 1.37x vs HON's 15.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | CATCaterpillar Inc. | DEDeere & Company | EMREmerson Electric … | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $111.8B | $416.8B | $157.3B | $79.0B | $136.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121.0B | $450.1B | $213.0B | $91.2B | $159.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.68x | 47.57x | 31.37x | 34.92x | 29.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.58x | 38.79x | 32.53x | 21.71x | 20.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.37x | 1.69x | 1.92x | 7.73x | 15.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.36x | 33.41x | 20.01x | 18.07x | 19.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.63x | 6.17x | 3.52x | 4.39x | 3.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.43x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 3.94x | 9.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.48x | 40.56x | 48.69x | 29.63x | 25.39x |
HON leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for EMR. EMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DE's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PH scores 8/9 vs DE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | CATCaterpillar Inc. | DEDeere & Company | EMREmerson Electric … | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +47.5% | +15.5% | +12.1% | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +10.0% | +3.9% | +5.8% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +15.9% | +7.7% | +8.2% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.8% | +19.1% | +11.4% | +10.0% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.68x | 2.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.2B | $33.4B | $55.7B | $12.2B | $22.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $467M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $1.5B | $12.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.6B | $43.3B | $63.9B | $13.8B | $34.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.39x | 9.22x | 2.74x | 6.46x | 3.92x |
PH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,326 for HON. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs HON's +2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs HON's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | CATCaterpillar Inc. | DEDeere & Company | EMREmerson Electric … | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.7% | +50.2% | +24.7% | +4.3% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.4% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +30.4% | +2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.5% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +75.9% | +16.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.4% | +282.5% | +54.1% | +59.5% | +3.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +737.4% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +206.6% | +135.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.3% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +20.7% | +5.1% |
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs EMR's 85.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | CATCaterpillar Inc. | DEDeere & Company | EMREmerson Electric … | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 1.52x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1034.96 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $165.15 | $248.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $616.56 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $108.37 | $186.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +85.4% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 61.3 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 710K | 2.4M | 1.2M | 2.8M | 3.7M |
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EMR and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PH as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", EMR as "Buy", HON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for PH (target: $1042) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, HON offers the higher dividend yield at 2.14% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | CATCaterpillar Inc. | DEDeere & Company | EMREmerson Electric … | HONHoneywell Interna… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1042.08 | $824.80 | $680.54 | $161.92 | $243.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 53 | 46 | 41 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.5% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 8 | 8 | 37 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.61 | $5.86 | $6.33 | $2.10 | $4.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.6% | +2.8% |
Evenly matched — EMR and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PH vs CAT vs DE vs EMR vs HON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger pick with 7. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 4x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Parker-Hannifin Corporation wins at 1. 20x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to +3. 3% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus HON's +135. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 173% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is pulling ahead at 7. 8% versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Parker-Hannifin Corporation grew EPS 24. 2% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for Honeywell International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMR leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON?
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
8% net margin versus 11. 3% for Deere & Company — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PH leads at 20. 5% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 20x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc. (HON) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 18. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PH: 17. 6% to $1042. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is PH or CAT or DE or EMR or HON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, EMR: +206. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PH and CAT and DE and EMR and HON?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PH: 10.6% · CAT: 22.2%)Net Margin>
%
(PH: 16.6% · CAT: 13.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PH: 32.7x · CAT: 47.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.