Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC vs BWFG vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC vs BWFG vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $383M | $2.52B | $272M | $444M | $184M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $902M | $120M | $208M | $135M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $169M | $25M | $35M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 73.6% | 70.3% | 51.6% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 24.3% | 27.2% | 23.3% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 535.7x | 11.5x | 9.7x | 10.3x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $327M | $115M | $180M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $185M | $132M | $225M | $26M |
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC vs BWFG vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) | 100 | 237.2 | +137.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 349.9 | +249.9% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC vs BWFG vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 39.2%
- Beta 0.63, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.09x
- NIM 3.4% vs BWFG's 2.9%
- 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%
FUNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 361.3% 10Y total return vs PKBK's 286.6%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.64
BWFG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.24 vs NBTB's 1.64
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.60 vs NBTB's 0.76
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs NBTB's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.1% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC vs BWFG vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC vs BWFG vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PKBK leads in 3 of 6 categories
FUNC leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • BWFG leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PKBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 7.5x FUNC's $120M. PKBK is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $902M | $120M | $208M | $135M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $241M | $35M | $53M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $169M | $25M | $35M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $225M | $16M | -$5M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +73.6% | +70.3% | +51.6% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +24.3% | +27.2% | +23.3% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +18.8% | +20.5% | +16.9% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +24.9% | +13.1% | -2.4% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +39.5% | +20.2% | +2.1% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PKBK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, PKBK trades at a 30% valuation discount to NBTB's 14.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.29x vs NBTB's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $2.5B | $272M | $444M | $184M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $2.7B | $255M | $398M | $227M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.17x | 14.47x | 11.11x | 12.50x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 535.67x | 11.54x | 9.66x | 10.27x | 11.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.72x | 2.06x | 0.85x | 0.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 11.03x | 7.85x | 7.58x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 2.90x | 2.28x | 2.14x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.29x | 1.34x | 1.44x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 11.49x | 17.67x | 16.98x | 17.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PKBK leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWFG's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PKBK scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +9.5% | +12.6% | +12.2% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +7.9% | +7.1% | +8.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +2.4% | +9.8% | +4.4% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.17x | 0.56x | 0.60x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $142M | -$17M | -$45M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $185M | $132M | $225M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $327M | $115M | $180M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 1.05x | 0.99x | 0.49x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, PKBK leads with a +67.1% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.0% | +17.6% | +14.3% | +24.4% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.1% | +18.3% | +44.4% | +57.3% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +48.5% | +192.2% | +132.8% | +13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +44.4% | +141.9% | +111.5% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.6% | +108.5% | +361.3% | +198.5% | +135.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +14.1% | +43.0% | +32.5% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.76x | 0.67x | 0.65x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.24 | $48.27 | $42.35 | $56.48 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.78 | $39.20 | $28.00 | $33.85 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +99.8% | +98.9% | +98.5% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 63.1 | 71.6 | 63.3 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 266K | 13K | 44K | 45K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -4.5% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs BWFG's 1.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $25.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +3.0% | +2.2% | +1.4% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $1.43 | $0.92 | $0.80 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.4% |
PKBK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC vs BWFG vs MNSB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (535. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately 27% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 60% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB?
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKBK leads at 34. 2% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 535. 7x for Parke Bancorp, Inc. — 526. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: -4. 5% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 4% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is PKBK or NBTB or FUNC or BWFG or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 2. 2% yield, +361. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +361. 3%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKBK and NBTB and FUNC and BWFG and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.