Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PLBC logo
PLBC
BSVN logo
BSVN
HAFC logo
HAFC
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLBC vs BSVN vs HAFC vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.+155.9%
BSVN
Bank7 Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$446M
5Y Perf.+328.0%
HAFC
Hanmi Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$949M
5Y Perf.+227.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

PLBC vs BSVN vs HAFC vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLBC logoPLBC
BSVN logoBSVN
HAFC logoHAFC
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$398M$446M$949M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$137M$444M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$30M$43M$76M$57.05B
Gross Margin81.5%69.7%57.4%60.0%
Operating Margin35.4%41.4%24.3%25.9%
Forward P/E10.1x10.5x10.0x14.4x
Total Debt$148M$0.00$280M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$81M$245M$213M$343.34B

PLBC vs BSVN vs HAFC vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLBC
BSVN
HAFC
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC)100255.9+155.9%
Bank7 Corp. (BSVN)100428.0+328.0%
Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC)100327.0+227.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLBC vs BSVN vs HAFC vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BSVN and HAFC are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Hanmi Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. PLBC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp
The Banking Pick

PLBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
BSVN
Bank7 Corp.
The Banking Pick

BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, current ratio 502.78x
  • PEG 0.61 vs PLBC's 0.97
  • Beta 0.64, yield 2.1%, current ratio 502.78x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HAFC
Hanmi Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

HAFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 22.4%
  • Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.79 vs 0.81
  • 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
  • +39.4% vs BSVN's +20.3%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Financial Play

JPM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPLBC logoPLBC48.6% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
ValueHAFC logoHAFCLower P/E (10.0x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.79 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsBSVN logoBSVNEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBSVN logoBSVNBeta 0.64 vs JPM's 0.94
DividendsHAFC logoHAFC3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)HAFC logoHAFC+39.4% vs BSVN's +20.3%
Efficiency (ROA)BSVN logoBSVNEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4%

PLBC vs BSVN vs HAFC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLBCPlumas Bancorp
FY 2025
Service
83.0%$3M
Bank Servicing
17.0%$641,000
BSVNBank7 Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

HAFCHanmi Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking Segment
100.0%$270M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

PLBC vs BSVN vs HAFC vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBSVNLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — PLBC and BSVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2503.2x PLBC's $112M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAFC's 17.1%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$137M$444M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$41M$58M$110M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M$43M$76M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$36M$204M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.5%+69.7%+57.4%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.4%+41.4%+24.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.4%+31.4%+17.1%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.1%+26.4%+45.8%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.9%-3.4%+20.7%+16.0%
Evenly matched — PLBC and BSVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 35% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.61x vs PLBC's 1.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$398M$446M$949M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$466M$202M$1.0B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.47x10.33x12.65x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.06x10.46x10.05x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x0.61x1.00x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.76x3.48x8.95x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x3.25x2.13x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x1.77x1.20x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.64x10.78x4.66x8.88x
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAFC. HAFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%+18.2%+9.8%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+2.3%+1.0%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+18.3%+7.4%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.1%+5.2%+2.5%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93595
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x0.35x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$67M-$245M$68M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$81M$245M$213M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$148M$0$280M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.85x1.39x0.62x0.74x
BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,045 for HAFC. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +39.4% total return vs BSVN's +20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs PLBC's 17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.3%+13.0%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+20.3%+39.4%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.0%+97.2%+116.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.2%+189.1%+80.5%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+574.9%+169.2%+73.3%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.5%+25.4%+29.3%+33.6%
Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BSVN and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BSVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.64x0.82x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.00$50.10$31.87$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.70$37.56$22.00$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+92.8%+99.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.462.662.559.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded56K11K203K7.0M
Evenly matched — BSVN and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HAFC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", BSVN as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 5.5% for HAFC (target: $34). For income investors, HAFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.42% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.50$57.00$33.50$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts331161
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.1%+3.4%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises57115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.18$0.98$1.09$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%+1.0%+3.9%
Evenly matched — HAFC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HAFC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BSVN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.

Best OverallBank7 Corp. (BSVN)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLBC vs BSVN vs HAFC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.

(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus Plumas Bancorp's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.

(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +80. 5% for Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus HAFC's +73. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank7 Corp.

(BSVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 47% more volatile than BSVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.

6% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM?

Bank7 Corp.

(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 17. 1% for Hanmi Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 24. 3% for HAFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus Plumas Bancorp's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is PLBC or BSVN or HAFC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

71), 2. 1% yield, +574. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLBC: +574. 9%, HAFC: +73. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PLBC and BSVN and HAFC and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.