Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLRX vs GILD vs HALO vs CRL vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
PLRX vs GILD vs HALO vs CRL vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $70M | $155.93B | $8.24B | $9.03B | $37.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $29.73B | $1.51B | $4.03B | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-113M | $9.22B | $349M | $-185M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.4% | 76.9% | 31.9% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 38.3% | 57.0% | 11.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.5x | 8.6x | 16.9x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $24.59B | $2.14B | $3.07B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $7.56B | $134M | $214M | $1.66B |
PLRX vs GILD vs HALO vs CRL vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pliant Therapeutics… (PLRX) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Gilead Sciences, In… (GILD) | 100 | 163.2 | +63.2% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 259.2 | +159.2% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 191.0 | +91.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLRX vs GILD vs HALO vs CRL vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GILD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 1.68x
- PEG 0.14 vs HALO's 0.37
- 31.0% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
HALO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 366.4%
- Beta 0.58, current ratio 4.66x
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 37.7x)
- +27.4% vs PLRX's -23.1%
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 65.2% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.0% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs CRL's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.4% vs PLRX's -23.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.1% ROA vs PLRX's -45.1%, ROIC 23.2% vs -49.2% |
PLRX vs GILD vs HALO vs CRL vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLRX vs GILD vs HALO vs CRL vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
ALNY leads 1 • GILD leads 1 • PLRX leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILD and PLRX operate at a comparable scale, with $29.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. GILD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $29.7B | $1.5B | $4.0B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$118M | $13.2B | $961M | $824M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$113M | $9.2B | $349M | -$185M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | $10.2B | $668M | $391M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.4% | +76.9% | +31.9% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +38.3% | +57.0% | +11.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +31.0% | +23.1% | -4.6% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +34.4% | +44.3% | +9.7% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +42.2% | +1.2% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.2% | +54.8% | +31.2% | -160.0% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.5x trailing earnings, GILD trades at a 85% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GILD offers better value at 0.14x vs HALO's 1.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70M | $155.9B | $8.2B | $9.0B | $37.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54M | $173.0B | $10.3B | $11.9B | $37.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.47x | 18.52x | 27.15x | -64.44x | 121.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.57x | 16.90x | 37.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.14x | 1.18x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.96x | 11.34x | 13.04x | 67.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.30x | 5.90x | 2.25x | 10.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 6.97x | 176.41x | 2.89x | 48.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.49x | 12.79x | 17.42x | 81.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 126.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $126 in annual profit, vs $-59 for PLRX. PLRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HALO's 43.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GILD scores 9/9 vs PLRX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.1% | +42.3% | +126.3% | -5.7% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.1% | +16.1% | +14.7% | -2.5% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.2% | +23.2% | +32.1% | +6.3% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.4% | +24.8% | +38.2% | +8.1% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.09x | 43.89x | 0.95x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $17.0B | $2.0B | $2.9B | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $7.6B | $134M | $214M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $24.6B | $2.1B | $3.1B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -29.83x | 11.21x | 44.97x | 4.29x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GILD five years ago would be worth $20,646 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $343 for PLRX. Over the past 12 months, HALO leads with a +27.4% total return vs PLRX's -23.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 27.3% vs PLRX's -63.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | +4.0% | -1.2% | -7.4% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.1% | +14.9% | +27.4% | +23.5% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | +73.3% | +106.4% | -8.7% | +46.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +106.5% | +60.3% | -47.2% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.7% | +81.5% | +701.6% | +122.4% | +366.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.2% | +20.1% | +27.3% | -3.0% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GILD and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GILD is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HALO currently trades 84.5% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.54x | 0.58x | 1.39x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.95 | $157.29 | $82.22 | $228.88 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.09 | $104.46 | $51.06 | $143.06 | $281.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.9% | +79.8% | +84.5% | +81.9% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 40.9 | 57.1 | 60.8 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 481K | 6.3M | 1.5M | 767K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
GILD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GILD as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.6% upside for ALNY (target: $446) vs 13.7% for CRL (target: $213). GILD is the only dividend payer here at 2.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $161.12 | $88.25 | $213.17 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 58 | 27 | 37 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.19 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +4.2% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ALNY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PLRX vs GILD vs HALO vs CRL vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the cheapest at 18. 5x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) delivered a total return of +106. 5%, compared to -96. 6% for Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. (PLRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +701. 6% versus PLRX's -94. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning CRL is approximately 155% more volatile than GILD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. (PLRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 44% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gilead Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 1684% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY?
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 9% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus 0. 0% for PLRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 29. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALNY: 57. 6% to $445. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY?
In this comparison, GILD (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. PLRX, HALO, CRL, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLRX or GILD or HALO or CRL or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GILD: +81. 5%, CRL: +122. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLRX and GILD and HALO and CRL and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GILD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GILD pays a dividend while PLRX, HALO, CRL, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.