Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLTK vs GRVY vs GLBE vs SKLZ vs EA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Specialty Retail
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
PLTK vs GRVY vs GLBE vs SKLZ vs EA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Specialty Retail | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $1.36B | $421M | $5.52B | $109M | $50.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.79B | $561.99B | $962M | $104M | $7.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-295M | $80.77B | $68M | $-70M | $887M |
| Gross Margin | 73.0% | 36.2% | 45.3% | 87.5% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 15.8% | 7.4% | -68.3% | 15.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 8.9x | 29.2x | — | 23.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.65B | $0.00 | $42M | $129M | $1.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $684M | $203.59B | $246M | $195M | $2.86B |
PLTK vs GRVY vs GLBE vs SKLZ vs EA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playtika Holding Co… (PLTK) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| Gravity Co., Ltd. (GRVY) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) | 100 | 99.3 | -0.7% |
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) | 100 | 140.5 | +40.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLTK vs GRVY vs GLBE vs SKLZ vs EA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLTK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 1.29, yield 11.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 23.4x)
- 11.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EA's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
GRVY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 14.4% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4%
- 11.8% ROA vs SKLZ's -21.8%, ROIC 15.5% vs -148.3%
GLBE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- PEG 0.22 vs EA's 5.69
- 27.8% revenue growth vs EA's 0.9%
SKLZ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +34.7% vs PLTK's -28.3%
EA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 0.4%
- 217.6% 10Y total return vs GRVY's 30.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.18 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs EA's 0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 23.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EA's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs PLTK's -28.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs SKLZ's -21.8%, ROIC 15.5% vs -148.3% |
PLTK vs GRVY vs GLBE vs SKLZ vs EA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLTK vs GRVY vs GLBE vs SKLZ vs EA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EA leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLTK leads 1 • GRVY leads 1 • GLBE leads 0 • SKLZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GRVY and SKLZ and EA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRVY is the larger business by revenue, generating $562.0B annually — 5378.1x SKLZ's $104M. GRVY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKLZ's -67.4%. On growth, SKLZ holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $562.0B | $962M | $104M | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $217M | $98.2B | $130M | -$70M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$295M | $80.8B | $68M | -$70M | $887M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $561M | $0 | $295M | -$70M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.0% | +36.2% | +45.3% | +87.5% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +15.8% | +7.4% | -68.3% | +15.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +14.4% | +7.1% | -67.4% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +13.4% | +30.6% | -67.3% | +30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +38.9% | +28.0% | +53.8% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +5.4% | — | -24.7% | +90.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PLTK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, GRVY trades at a 89% valuation discount to GLBE's 83.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GLBE offers better value at 0.64x vs EA's 13.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $421M | $5.5B | $109M | $50.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $281M | $5.3B | $43M | $48.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.53x | 8.94x | 83.67x | -1.55x | 57.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.23x | — | 29.20x | — | 23.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.11x | 0.64x | — | 13.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.09x | 5.09x | 57.36x | — | 39.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 1.08x | 5.74x | 1.04x | 6.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.96x | 6.16x | 0.97x | 7.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.56x | 8.04x | 19.66x | — | 21.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRVY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EA delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-53 for SKLZ. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKLZ's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GRVY scores 6/9 vs PLTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +14.1% | +7.3% | -52.5% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.0% | +11.8% | +4.7% | -21.8% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.1% | +15.5% | +7.7% | -148.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +13.1% | +7.7% | -34.0% | +12.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.04x | 1.15x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | -$203.6B | -$204M | -$66M | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $684M | $203.6B | $246M | $195M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $0 | $42M | $129M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.99x | 15.33x | 17.83x | -7.08x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EA five years ago would be worth $14,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for SKLZ. Over the past 12 months, SKLZ leads with a +34.7% total return vs PLTK's -28.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EA at 17.3% vs PLTK's -24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | +3.4% | -13.8% | +58.3% | -1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.3% | +0.7% | -12.5% | +34.7% | +29.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.8% | +9.7% | +4.0% | -42.7% | +61.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | -44.8% | +28.0% | -97.8% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | +3024.2% | +28.0% | -96.5% | +217.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.4% | +3.1% | +1.3% | -16.9% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs SKLZ's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.61x | 1.63x | 2.57x | 0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.52 | $74.75 | $43.21 | $20.00 | $204.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.64 | $54.54 | $27.80 | $2.23 | $141.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.1% | +81.1% | +75.5% | +34.9% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 48.9 | 45.2 | 54.4 | 35.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 29K | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PLTK and EA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLTK as "Hold", GLBE as "Buy", SKLZ as "Hold", EA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs -14.0% for EA (target: $173). For income investors, PLTK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.11% vs EA's 0.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.75 | — | $43.40 | $72.00 | $172.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | — | 14 | 7 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.1% | — | — | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — | — | — | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +8.5% | +2.1% |
EA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). PLTK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PLTK vs GRVY vs GLBE vs SKLZ vs EA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 9% for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA). Gravity Co. , Ltd. (GRVY) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA?
On trailing P/E, Gravity Co.
, Ltd. (GRVY) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 83. 7x. On forward P/E, Playtika Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Global-e Online Ltd. wins at 0. 22x versus Electronic Arts Inc. 's 5. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA?
Over the past 5 years, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -97. 8% for Skillz Inc. (SKLZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRVY returned +30. 2% versus SKLZ's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately 1290% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 115% for Skillz Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus 0. 9% for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for Playtika Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA?
Gravity Co.
, Ltd. (GRVY) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus -67. 4% for Skillz Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EA leads at 15. 4% versus -68. 3% for SKLZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Electronic Arts Inc. 's 5. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Global-e Online Ltd. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931. 5% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA?
In this comparison, PLTK (11.
1% yield), EA (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GRVY, GLBE, SKLZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLTK or GRVY or GLBE or SKLZ or EA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), +217. 6% 10Y return). Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EA: +217. 6%, SKLZ: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLTK and GRVY and GLBE and SKLZ and EA?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLTK (Technology) and GRVY (Technology) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and SKLZ (Technology) and EA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLTK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GRVY is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SKLZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PLTK pays a dividend while GRVY, GLBE, SKLZ, EA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.