Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLUT vs PFIS vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
PLUT vs PFIS vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $44M | $594M | $22.48B | $29.67B | $10.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $281M | $11.66B | $21.09B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $59M | $2.67B | $3.20B | $519M |
| Gross Margin | -14.6% | 66.6% | 37.6% | 60.8% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | -74.2% | 25.7% | 17.0% | 24.4% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x | 6.9x | 6.8x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $258M | $4.01B | $29.12B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $58M | $599M | $798M | $102M |
PLUT vs PFIS vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plutus Financial Gr… (PLUT) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| Peoples Financial S… (PFIS) | 100 | 121.5 | +21.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 23.5 | -76.5% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLUT vs PFIS vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLUT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 4.16x
PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 94.9% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.7%
- Beta 0.83, yield 4.1%, current ratio 8.76x
- 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs PLUT's -55.6%
- 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 22.9% margin vs PLUT's -56.7%
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs JKHY's 2.11
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.19 vs 2.11
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Beta 0.21 vs FISV's 0.87
- 17.0% ROA vs PLUT's -11.3%, ROIC 21.0% vs -9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs PLUT's -55.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.19 vs 2.11 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs PLUT's -56.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs FISV's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.5% vs FISV's -69.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs PLUT's -11.3%, ROIC 21.0% vs -9.1% |
PLUT vs PFIS vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLUT vs PFIS vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • PFIS leads 1 • PLUT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 2163.5x PLUT's $10M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUT's -56.7%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $281M | $11.7B | $21.1B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $80M | $3.4B | $7.5B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $59M | $2.7B | $3.2B | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $43M | $2.7B | $4.0B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | +66.6% | +37.6% | +60.8% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -74.2% | +25.7% | +17.0% | +24.4% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.7% | +21.1% | +22.9% | +15.2% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -96.3% | +15.4% | +23.6% | +19.0% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +30.1% | -2.0% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +95.1% | +30.6% | -29.1% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 58.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs FIS's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $594M | $22.5B | $29.7B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $794M | $25.9B | $58.0B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -57.20x | 10.09x | 58.00x | 8.75x | 23.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.18x | 6.94x | 6.82x | 21.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.26x | 2.38x | 0.25x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.99x | 7.11x | 6.55x | 13.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 35.13x | 2.11x | 2.11x | 1.40x | 4.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.70x | 1.15x | 1.62x | 1.18x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.70x | 8.00x | 6.83x | 17.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-15 for PLUT. PLUT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFIS scores 6/9 vs PLUT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | +11.8% | +18.4% | +12.4% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.3% | +1.2% | +7.5% | +4.0% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.1% | +7.7% | +6.0% | +8.1% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +2.4% | +6.6% | +10.2% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.50x | 0.29x | 1.13x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $200M | $3.4B | $28.3B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $58M | $599M | $798M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $258M | $4.0B | $29.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.68x | 0.77x | 15.37x | 6.39x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFIS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFIS five years ago would be worth $16,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,487 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, PFIS leads with a +29.5% total return vs FISV's -69.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFIS at 19.7% vs FISV's -22.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.1% | +24.5% | -33.0% | -15.4% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.9% | +29.5% | -42.1% | -69.4% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | +71.7% | -13.3% | -53.6% | -1.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | +60.0% | -65.1% | -52.2% | -1.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | +94.9% | -18.4% | +7.1% | +94.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | +19.7% | -4.6% | -22.6% | -0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFIS currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.83x | 0.65x | 0.87x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $59.86 | $82.74 | $191.91 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.04 | $43.64 | $43.28 | $52.91 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.0% | +99.1% | +52.6% | +28.9% | +75.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 60.9 | 50.8 | 39.4 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 54K | 5.6M | 5.3M | 903K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PFIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFIS as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -5.6% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, PFIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.12% vs JKHY's 1.55%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $56.00 | $67.14 | $74.08 | $194.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 37 | 60 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% | +3.8% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 | 1 | — | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 | $1.63 | — | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.3% | +19.9% | +0.3% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PLUT vs PFIS vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -65. 1% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFIS returned +94. 9% versus PLUT's -28. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning FISV is approximately 311% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus -55. 6% for Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus -56. 7% for Plutus Financial Group Limited — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus -74. 2% for PLUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFIS leads at 66. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 54. 3% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY?
In this comparison, PFIS (4.
1% yield), FIS (3. 8% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. PLUT, FISV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLUT or PFIS or FIS or FISV or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 7%, FISV: +7. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLUT and PFIS and FIS and FISV and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLUT (Financial Services) and PFIS (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and FISV (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PFIS, FIS, JKHY pay a dividend while PLUT, FISV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.