Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PN vs XOM vs CVX vs CSIQ vs FSLR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PN
Skycorp Solar Group Limited

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-91.6%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$611.92B
5Y Perf.+21.4%
CVX
Chevron Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$362.06B
5Y Perf.+8.5%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.+131.9%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.63B
5Y Perf.+74.0%

PN vs XOM vs CVX vs CSIQ vs FSLR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PN logoPN
XOM logoXOM
CVX logoCVX
CSIQ logoCSIQ
FSLR logoFSLR
IndustrySolarOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas IntegratedSolarSolar
Market Cap$8M$611.92B$362.06B$1.34B$23.63B
Revenue (TTM)$63M$323.90B$184.43B$5.60B$5.42B
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$28.84B$12.30B$-104M$1.67B
Gross Margin10.0%21.7%30.4%18.3%41.7%
Operating Margin-4.0%10.5%9.0%0.1%33.0%
Forward P/E14.3x14.7x12.4x
Total Debt$6M$43.54B$46.74B$7.68B$499M
Cash & Equiv.$9M$10.68B$6.47B$1.91B$2.80B

PN vs XOM vs CVX vs CSIQ vs FSLRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PN
XOM
CVX
CSIQ
FSLR
StockMar 25May 26Return
Skycorp Solar Group… (PN)1008.4-91.6%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100121.4+21.4%
Chevron Corporation (CVX)100108.5+8.5%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)100231.9+131.9%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100174.0+74.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PN vs XOM vs CVX vs CSIQ vs FSLR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Skycorp Solar Group Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. CVX and CSIQ also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PN
Skycorp Solar Group Limited
The Defensive Pick

PN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.21, current ratio 1.59x
  • 27.0% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
  • Beta 0.21 vs CSIQ's 2.28, lower leverage
Best for: defensive
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, XOM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
CVX
Chevron Corporation
The Income Pick

CVX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 3.8%
  • 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CSIQ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +117.8% vs PN's -88.3%
Best for: momentum
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Growth Play

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
  • 334.7% 10Y total return vs CVX's 134.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPN logoPN27.0% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
ValueFSLR logoFSLRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs PN's -4.3%
Stability / SafetyPN logoPNBeta 0.21 vs CSIQ's 2.28, lower leverage
DividendsCVX logoCVX3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+117.8% vs PN's -88.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs PN's -7.0%, ROIC 17.6% vs -10.8%

PN vs XOM vs CVX vs CSIQ vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PNSkycorp Solar Group Limited
FY 2025
Consolidated
99.4%$63M
Other Segment
0.6%$385,947
XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B
CVXChevron Corporation
FY 2025
Downstream
61.1%$72.5B
Upstream
38.4%$45.5B
All Other Segments
0.5%$644M
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B

PN vs XOM vs CVX vs CSIQ vs FSLR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGCSIQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 5116.1x PN's $63M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PN's -4.3%. On growth, FSLR holds the edge at +23.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$63M$323.9B$184.4B$5.6B$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$59.9B$37.1B$284M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$28.8B$12.3B-$104M$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23.6B$16.2B-$1.7B$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+21.7%+30.4%+18.3%+41.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.0%+10.5%+9.0%+0.1%+33.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.3%+8.9%+6.7%-1.9%+30.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%+7.3%+8.8%-29.6%+30.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.3%-5.3%-20.0%+23.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.0%-24.5%-3.7%+65.1%
FSLR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PN and CSIQ and FSLR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 43% valuation discount to CVX's 27.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVX's 10.8x.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$8M$611.9B$362.1B$1.3B$23.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$644.8B$402.3B$7.1B$21.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.64x21.55x27.37x-12.94x15.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.31x14.68x12.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.76x10.84x9.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.12x1.89x1.96x0.24x4.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.33x2.33x1.75x0.32x2.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.22x25.92x21.82x19.91x
Evenly matched — PN and CSIQ and FSLR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-13 for PN. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSIQ's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.1%+10.7%+7.2%-2.5%+18.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.0%+6.4%+4.2%-0.7%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.8%+8.6%+6.2%-0.2%+17.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-11.9%+8.9%+6.6%-0.3%+15.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933517
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x0.16x0.24x1.80x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M$32.9B$40.3B$5.8B-$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$10.7B$6.5B$1.9B$2.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$43.5B$46.7B$7.7B$499M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.47x69.44x17.22x0.02x53.51x
FSLR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

XOM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $30,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $721 for PN. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +117.8% total return vs PN's -88.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 12.7% vs PN's -58.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-59.9%+18.6%+17.5%-21.1%-19.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-88.3%+39.9%+37.4%+117.8%+64.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.8%+43.0%+26.0%-45.9%+23.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.8%+160.6%+93.8%-46.3%+204.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.8%+102.6%+134.7%+29.8%+334.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-58.4%+12.7%+8.0%-18.5%+7.4%
XOM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSIQ's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVX currently trades 84.5% from its 52-week high vs PN's 6.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.21x-0.20x-0.11x2.28x1.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$87.40$176.41$214.71$34.59$285.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.46$101.19$133.77$8.93$127.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.6%+81.8%+84.5%+58.0%+76.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.939.539.265.860.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M18.9M11.0M2.6M2.0M
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.0% upside for CSIQ (target: $34) vs 7.4% for CVX (target: $195). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs XOM's 2.77%.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$161.08$194.87$33.50$251.82
# AnalystsCovering analysts55533373
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2680
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.00$6.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.3%+3.3%+5.2%+0.1%
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XOM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PN vs XOM vs CVX vs CSIQ vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is the stronger pick with 27.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chevron Corporation (CVX) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR?

On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Chevron Corporation at 27. 4x. On forward P/E, First Solar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +204. 7%, compared to -92. 8% for Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +334. 7% versus PN's -92. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Canadian Solar Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning CSIQ is approximately -1266% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 180% for Canadian Solar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is pulling ahead at 27.

0% versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Solar, Inc. grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -747. 1% for Skycorp Solar Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -4. 3% for Skycorp Solar Group Limited — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -4. 0% for PN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSLR leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for Chevron Corporation — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSIQ: 67. 0% to $33. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR?

In this comparison, CVX (3.

8% yield), XOM (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PN, CSIQ, FSLR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PN or XOM or CVX or CSIQ or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 8% yield, +102. 6% 10Y return). Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +102. 6%, CSIQ: +29. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PN and XOM and CVX and CSIQ and FSLR?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PN is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. XOM, CVX pay a dividend while PN, CSIQ, FSLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PN and XOM and CVX and CSIQ and FSLR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PN: 27.0% · XOM: -1.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.