Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PNBK logo
PNBK
ICE logo
ICE
FIS logo
FIS
CME logo
CME
JKHY logo
JKHY
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PNBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PNBK
Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$114M
5Y Perf.-83.6%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
CME
CME Group Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$97.79B
5Y Perf.+65.8%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.28B
5Y Perf.-30.3%

PNBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PNBK logoPNBK
ICE logoICE
FIS logoFIS
CME logoCME
JKHY logoJKHY
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesInformation Technology ServicesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$114M$79.60B$20.26B$97.79B$9.28B
Revenue (TTM)$61M$12.64B$11.66B$6.76B$2.52B
Net Income (TTM)$-12M$3.30B$2.67B$4.24B$519M
Gross Margin53.5%61.9%37.6%86.3%44.1%
Operating Margin-19.1%38.7%17.9%65.6%26.0%
Forward P/E0.7x17.3x6.2x22.0x18.7x
Total Debt$16M$20.28B$4.01B$3.76B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$186M$837M$599M$4.42B$102M

PNBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PNBK
ICE
FIS
CME
JKHY
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Patriot National Ba… (PNBK)10016.4-83.6%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
CME Group Inc. (CME)100165.8+65.8%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10069.7-30.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PNBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CME and JKHY are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PNBK, ICE, and FIS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PNBK
Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PNBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (0.7x vs 18.7x)
Best for: value
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs PNBK's -4.0%
Best for: growth
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs ICE's 1.95
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: valuation efficiency
CME
CME Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

CME has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.

  • 262.4% 10Y total return vs ICE's 195.3%
  • 62.8% margin vs PNBK's -19.2%
  • +3.6% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Income Pick

JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.10, current ratio 1.27x
  • Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthICE logoICE7.5% NII/revenue growth vs PNBK's -4.0%
ValuePNBK logoPNBKLower P/E (0.7x vs 18.7x)
Quality / MarginsCME logoCME62.8% margin vs PNBK's -19.2%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.10 vs PNBK's 1.46
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CME logoCME+3.6% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs -12.8%

PNBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PNBKPatriot National Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
CMECME Group Inc.
FY 2025
clearing and transaction fees
81.0%$5.3B
MarketData
12.3%$803M
OtherRevenue
6.7%$436M
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M

PNBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMELAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CME leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 207.3x PNBK's $61M. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPNBK logoPNBKPatriot National …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$61M$12.6B$11.7B$6.8B$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M$6.5B$4.1B$4.7B$810M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$12M$3.3B$2.7B$4.2B$519M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$12M$4.3B$2.8B$4.4B$728M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.5%+61.9%+37.6%+86.3%+44.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-19.1%+38.7%+17.9%+65.6%+26.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-19.2%+26.1%+22.9%+62.8%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-19.6%+33.9%+23.9%+64.4%+28.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+23.1%+30.6%+21.4%+12.5%
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PNBK and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 20.5x trailing earnings, JKHY trades at a 61% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CME offers better value at 1.76x vs ICE's 2.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPNBK logoPNBKPatriot National …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Market CapShares × price$114M$79.6B$20.3B$97.8B$9.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$56M$99.0B$23.7B$97.1B$9.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.06x24.36x52.27x24.15x20.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.68x17.34x6.24x21.98x18.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.74x2.14x1.76x2.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.34x6.50x21.56x11.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.96x6.30x1.90x15.00x3.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.80x2.77x1.46x3.38x4.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.56x7.21x23.32x15.78x
Evenly matched — PNBK and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. CME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPNBK logoPNBKPatriot National …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.5%+11.6%+18.4%+15.3%+24.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.1%+2.3%+7.5%+2.2%+17.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-12.8%+7.5%+6.0%+10.2%+21.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-15.1%+9.5%+6.6%+3.6%+22.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–949656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.70x0.29x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$170M$19.4B$3.4B-$666M-$102M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$186M$837M$599M$4.4B$102M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$16M$20.3B$4.0B$3.8B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.42x6.53x21.16x41.55x122.37x
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CME five years ago would be worth $14,623 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,162 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, CME leads with a +3.6% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CME at 18.9% vs PNBK's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPNBK logoPNBKPatriot National …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-41.9%-11.8%-38.9%+3.2%-27.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-11.8%-20.4%-49.4%+3.6%-27.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.8%+34.6%-18.9%+67.9%-15.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.4%+30.9%-67.3%+46.2%-14.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.1%+195.3%-25.6%+262.4%+74.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-49.0%+10.4%-6.8%+18.9%-5.3%
CME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CME currently trades 81.9% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPNBK logoPNBKPatriot National …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.46x0.35x0.61x-0.28x0.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.00$189.35$82.74$329.16$193.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.86$136.67$37.91$244.56$124.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.5%+74.2%+47.4%+81.9%+66.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10031.931.930.840.127.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded276K3.2M5.6M2.6M1.2M
CME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ICE as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", CME as "Hold", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 19.0% for CME (target: $321). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs ICE's 1.38%.

MetricPNBK logoPNBKPatriot National …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$194.00$62.88$320.80$194.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts36373622
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%+4.2%+4.1%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01311522
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.93$1.63$10.92$2.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%+7.0%+0.3%+0.4%
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CME leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). JKHY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallCME Group Inc. (CME)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PNBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (18. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY?

On trailing P/E, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the cheapest at 20. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY?

Over the past 5 years, CME Group Inc.

(CME) delivered a total return of +46. 2%, compared to -88. 4% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CME returned +262. 4% versus PNBK's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately -621% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -4. 0% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY?

CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CME leads at 86. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for CME Group Inc. — 21. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), CME (4. 1% yield), JKHY (1. 8% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PNBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PNBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 4. 1% yield, +262. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +262. 4%, PNBK: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PNBK and ICE and FIS and CME and JKHY?

These companies operate in different sectors (PNBK (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and CME (Financial Services) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PNBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ICE, FIS, CME, JKHY pay a dividend while PNBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.