Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PODC vs IHRT vs SIRI vs SPOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
PODC vs IHRT vs SIRI vs SPOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $67M | $880M | $9.00B | $87.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $3.86B | $8.58B | $17.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-473M | $846M | $2.72B |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 78.5% | 45.4% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | -0.5% | 18.0% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.5x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5.79B | $9.71B | $2.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $271K | $94M | $5.26B |
PODC vs IHRT vs SIRI vs SPOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PodcastOne, Inc. (PODC) | 100 | 178.3 | +78.3% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 179.4 | +79.4% |
| Sirius XM Holdings … (SIRI) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
| Spotify Technology … (SPOT) | 100 | 276.4 | +176.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PODC vs IHRT vs SIRI vs SPOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PODC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 61.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.2%
- 20.4% revenue growth vs SIRI's -1.6%
IHRT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +415.5% vs SPOT's -35.0%
SIRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.8%
- Beta 0.65, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.30x
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 33.0x)
- Beta 0.65 vs IHRT's 1.82
SPOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs SIRI's -7.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 27.9%, current ratio 1.72x
- 15.5% margin vs IHRT's -12.2%
- 19.3% ROA vs PODC's -16.3%, ROIC 40.5% vs -33.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.4% revenue growth vs SIRI's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 33.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.5% margin vs IHRT's -12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs IHRT's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs SPOT's -35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs PODC's -16.3%, ROIC 40.5% vs -33.3% |
PODC vs IHRT vs SIRI vs SPOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PODC vs IHRT vs SIRI vs SPOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPOT leads in 3 of 6 categories
SIRI leads 3 • PODC leads 0 • IHRT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.6B annually — 292.9x PODC's $60M. SPOT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IHRT's -12.2%. On growth, PODC holds the edge at +24.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $3.9B | $8.6B | $17.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $339M | $2.1B | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$473M | $846M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $11M | $1.4B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +78.5% | +45.4% | +32.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -0.5% | +18.0% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -12.2% | +9.9% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +0.3% | +15.8% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.8% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.5% | -20.8% | +22.0% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SIRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, SIRI trades at a 66% valuation discount to SPOT's 34.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIRI's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPOT's 31.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $880M | $9.0B | $88.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $6.7B | $18.6B | $84.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.58x | -1.86x | 11.89x | 34.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.53x | 32.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.65x | 9.04x | 31.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 0.23x | 1.05x | 4.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.63x | — | 0.83x | 9.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 80.64x | 7.23x | 26.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOT delivers a 35.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PODC. SPOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIRI's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPOT scores 6/9 vs IHRT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.5% | — | +7.3% | +35.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.3% | -12.0% | +3.1% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.3% | -0.4% | +5.2% | +40.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.8% | -0.5% | +6.1% | +26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.84x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $5.8B | $9.6B | -$2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $270,900 | $94M | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5.8B | $9.7B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.17x | 3.50x | 84.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOT five years ago would be worth $17,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,504 for IHRT. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs SPOT's -35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPOT at 43.5% vs PODC's -7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.2% | +36.6% | +31.7% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.0% | +415.5% | +31.6% | -35.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | +85.9% | -17.6% | +195.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | -75.0% | -43.8% | +78.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | -68.5% | -7.8% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.0% | +23.0% | -6.2% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SIRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIRI currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs SPOT's 54.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.82x | 0.65x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.90 | $6.56 | $28.77 | $785.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $1.08 | $19.77 | $405.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +86.4% | +93.0% | +54.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 68.6 | 59.8 | 32.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 986K | 4.8M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SIRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IHRT as "Buy", SIRI as "Buy", SPOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.5% upside for SPOT (target: $631) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, SIRI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.82% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | $26.75 | $630.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 32 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +3.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.6% |
SPOT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIRI leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
PODC vs IHRT vs SIRI vs SPOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PodcastOne, Inc.
(PODC) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT?
On trailing P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus Spotify Technology S. A. at 34. 6x. On forward P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT?
Over the past 5 years, Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) delivered a total return of +78. 5%, compared to -75. 0% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPOT returned +186. 8% versus IHRT's -68. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning IHRT is approximately 180% more volatile than SIRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 84% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PodcastOne, Inc.
(PODC) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. grew EPS 145. 6% year-over-year, compared to 54. 3% for iHeartMedia, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PODC leads at 17. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT?
Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -12. 4% for PodcastOne, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIRI leads at 17. 2% versus -12. 3% for PODC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Spotify Technology S. A. — 24. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOT: 47. 5% to $630. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT?
In this comparison, SIRI (3.
8% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PODC, SPOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PODC or IHRT or SIRI or SPOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 8% yield). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIRI: -7. 8%, IHRT: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PODC and IHRT and SIRI and SPOT?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PODC is a small-cap high-growth stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPOT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SIRI pays a dividend while PODC, IHRT, SPOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.