Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs LKQ vs BWA vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs LKQ vs BWA vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $255M | $367M | $505M | $6.69B | $15.35B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.74B | $335M | $13.92B | $14.33B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-199M | $107M | $517M | $362M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.4% | 63.8% | 37.7% | 18.9% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.5% | 42.6% | 7.3% | 9.7% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 38.4x | 3.3x | 10.9x | 8.8x | 14.3x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $450K | $2.66B | $152M | $5.06B | $4.18B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48K | $1.35B | $199M | $319M | $2.31B | $10.27B | $343.34B |
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs LKQ vs BWA vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andretti Acquisitio… (POLE) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 33.4 | -66.6% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 86.0 | -14.0% |
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) | 100 | 221.6 | +121.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs LKQ vs BWA vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POLE is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
PSFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 25.3x)
ACIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.1%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- 13.1% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1%
- 31.9% margin vs PSFE's -11.4%
- Beta 0.10 vs PSFE's 2.44, lower leverage
LKQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 4.6%
- Beta 0.82, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.67x
- 4.6% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
BWA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +125.3% vs PSFE's -45.0%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs PSFE's -4.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.6%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BWA's 178.1%
- PEG 0.81 vs LKQ's 3.72
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.1% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs PSFE's -11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs PSFE's 2.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.3% vs PSFE's -45.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PSFE's -4.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.6% |
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs LKQ vs BWA vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs LKQ vs BWA vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • POLE leads 0 • LKQ leads 0 • BWA leads 0 • KO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and POLE operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -11.4%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $335M | $13.9B | $14.3B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $373M | $154M | $1.4B | $2.1B | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$199M | $107M | $517M | $362M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $174M | $71M | $808M | $1.4B | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +48.4% | +63.8% | +37.7% | +18.9% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.5% | +42.6% | +7.3% | +9.7% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -11.4% | +31.9% | +3.7% | +2.5% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.0% | +21.1% | +5.8% | +10.1% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.4% | +9.3% | +0.2% | +0.5% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | -115.2% | +4.3% | -52.3% | +61.1% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 92% valuation discount to BWA's 58.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs LKQ's 4.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $255M | $367M | $505M | $6.7B | $15.4B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $256M | $1.7B | $459M | $11.4B | $17.2B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.36x | -2.26x | 4.86x | 11.15x | 58.21x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.27x | 10.94x | 8.82x | 14.34x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.70x | — | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.24x | 2.81x | 7.65x | 8.43x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.22x | 1.51x | 0.48x | 1.07x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 0.63x | 1.64x | 1.02x | 2.87x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.64x | 7.13x | 7.89x | 13.02x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-29 for PSFE. POLE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWA scores 8/9 vs POLE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.6% | -28.6% | +35.7% | +7.9% | +6.2% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | -4.2% | +9.0% | +3.3% | +2.6% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +3.6% | +41.0% | +7.2% | +12.9% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +3.6% | +26.0% | +9.0% | +12.7% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 4.06x | 0.48x | 0.77x | 0.74x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $401,531 | $1.3B | -$46M | $4.7B | $1.9B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48,469 | $1.3B | $199M | $319M | $2.3B | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $450,000 | $2.7B | $152M | $5.1B | $4.2B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.75x | 14.20x | 4.50x | 14.17x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $508 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, BWA leads with a +125.3% total return vs PSFE's -45.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs LKQ's -18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.2% | -11.0% | -1.6% | -10.8% | +60.5% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.5% | -45.0% | +5.2% | -29.8% | +125.3% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -33.0% | +137.8% | -45.4% | +88.9% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -94.9% | +98.7% | -35.1% | +69.0% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -94.1% | -24.1% | -1.7% | +178.1% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | -12.5% | +33.5% | -18.3% | +23.6% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POLE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POLE currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.00x | 2.44x | 0.10x | 0.82x | 1.22x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.90 | $15.02 | $13.06 | $39.77 | $78.82 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.36 | $5.95 | $9.79 | $23.98 | $32.24 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +47.3% | +80.0% | +65.9% | +94.5% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 39.7 | 44.8 | 43.7 | 62.6 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 324K | 238K | 2.8M | 2.7M | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LKQ and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold", LKQ as "Buy", BWA as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.7% upside for PSFE (target: $10) vs -81.8% for ACIC (target: $2). For income investors, LKQ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.62% vs BWA's 0.74%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.13 | $1.90 | $34.00 | $77.09 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 5 | 22 | 38 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.6% | +0.7% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.21 | $0.55 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +27.6% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +3.3% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
ACIC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
POLE vs PSFE vs ACIC vs LKQ vs BWA vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the stronger pick with 13.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus BorgWarner Inc. at 58. 2x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 3. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus LKQ Corporation's 3. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -94. 9% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PSFE's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 44β — meaning PSFE is approximately -1317% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Andretti Acquisition Corp. II (POLE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is pulling ahead at 13.
1% versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Andretti Acquisition Corp. II grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM?
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
8% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus 0. 0% for POLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus LKQ Corporation's 3. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSFE: 42. 7% to $10. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, LKQ (4.
6% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), BWA (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. POLE, PSFE, ACIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is POLE or PSFE or ACIC or LKQ or BWA or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 44 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PSFE: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POLE and PSFE and ACIC and LKQ and BWA and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (POLE (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and ACIC (Financial Services) and LKQ (Consumer Cyclical) and BWA (Consumer Cyclical) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: POLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. LKQ, BWA, KO, JPM pay a dividend while POLE, PSFE, ACIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.