PR
Permian Resources Corporation
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$17.56B
5Y Perf.+2000.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PR vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$629.60B
5Y Perf.+226.7%
PR vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PR | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $17.56B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.69B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $649M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 32.7% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 38.7% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.70B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $154M | $10.68B |
PR vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PR
XOM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | 100 | 2100.0 | +2000.0% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 326.7 | +226.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PR vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Exxon Mobil Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
The Income Pick
PR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth -11.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.5%
- 130.0% 10Y total return vs XOM's 107.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Defensive Pick
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.15, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
- Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 32.0%)
- 6.4% ROA vs PR's 3.7%, ROIC 8.6% vs 7.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PR | 1.3% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% |
| Value | PR | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 15.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | PR | 17.6% margin vs XOM's 8.9% |
| Stability / Safety | XOM | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 32.0%) |
| Dividends | PR | 2.9% yield, vs XOM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PR | +82.3% vs XOM's +45.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs PR's 3.7%, ROIC 8.6% vs 7.5% |
PR vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PR vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPRLAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
1leads
PRPermian Resources Cor…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PR4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XOM5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 87.8x PR's $3.7B. PR is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $649M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.6% | -11.0% |
PR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, PR trades at a 25% valuation discount to XOM's 22.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PR's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 11.1x.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.6B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.1B | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.57x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.51x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.02x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.47x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.51x | 26.66x |
PR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for PR. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PR's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PR scores 4/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $154M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.73x | 69.44x |
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PR five years ago would be worth $50,885 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27,178 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, PR leads with a +82.3% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PR at 31.0% vs XOM's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.4% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.3% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.7% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +408.8% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.0% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.0% | +13.7% |
PR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PR's 0.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PR currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.68 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.64 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.3M | 18.8M |
Evenly matched — PR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PR as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs 5.1% for PR (target: $22). For income investors, PR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs XOM's 2.69%.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.29 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +3.2% |
Evenly matched — PR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallPermian Resources Corporati… (PR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PR vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PR or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is the stronger pick with 1.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Permian Resources Corporation (PR) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Permian Resources Corporation (PR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PR or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is the cheapest at 16.
6x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Permian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PR or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) delivered a total return of +408.
8%, compared to +171. 8% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PR returned +130. 0% versus XOM's +107. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PR or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Permian Resources Corporation's 0. 23β — meaning PR is approximately -260% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 32% for Permian Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PR or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is pulling ahead at 1.
3% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Permian Resources Corporation grew EPS -11. 7% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PR leads at 33. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PR or XOM?
Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
5% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PR leads at 29. 0% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PR leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PR or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) trades at 11.
5x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 8. 0% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — PR or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Permian Resources Corporation (PR) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is PR or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, PR: +130. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PR and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PR: -100.0% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(PR: 17.6% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PR: 16.6x · XOM: 22.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.