Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs DOMO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs DOMO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.12B | $6.22B | $5.80B | $140M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $352M | $995M | $1.68B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $152M | $238M | $-59M |
| Gross Margin | 67.9% | 63.2% | 69.0% | 75.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | 17.1% | 20.1% | -12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 27.6x | 24.6x | 13.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $301M | $71M | $218M | $140M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $162M | $107M | $398M | $43M |
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs DOMO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) | 100 | 59.7 | -40.3% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 144.0 | +44.0% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| Domo, Inc. (DOMO) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs DOMO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +42.7% vs DOMO's -49.9%
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 13.1% 10Y total return vs PCTY's 184.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.20x
PCTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.43
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.43 vs DOMO's 2.63
DOMO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs DOMO's 0.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs DOMO's -18.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs DOMO's 2.63 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs DOMO's -49.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs DOMO's -28.9% |
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs DOMO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs DOMO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APPF leads in 2 of 6 categories
PCTY leads 1 • PRO leads 0 • DOMO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — APPF and PCTY and DOMO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCTY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 5.3x DOMO's $319M. APPF is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOMO's -18.6%. On growth, APPF holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $352M | $995M | $1.7B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $192M | $446M | -$19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $152M | $238M | -$59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $234M | $444M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.9% | +63.2% | +69.0% | +75.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +17.1% | +20.1% | -12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +15.3% | +14.2% | -18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +23.5% | +26.5% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +20.4% | +10.4% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +37.2% | +37.9% | +57.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PCTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.8x trailing earnings, PCTY trades at a 40% valuation discount to APPF's 44.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCTY's 13.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPF's 35.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $6.2B | $5.8B | $140M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $6.2B | $5.6B | $237M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -54.07x | 44.53x | 26.79x | -2.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.57x | 24.56x | 13.20x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.95x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.21x | 13.92x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 6.54x | 3.64x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 11.57x | 4.94x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.83x | 26.02x | 16.93x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $22 for PCTY. APPF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCTY's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs APPF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +30.9% | +21.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +24.2% | +3.4% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.2% | +22.4% | +26.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.3% | +25.9% | +23.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.18x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $139M | -$36M | -$180M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $162M | $107M | $398M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $301M | $71M | $218M | $140M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.79x | — | 23.29x | -8.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $662 for DOMO. Over the past 12 months, PRO leads with a +42.7% total return vs DOMO's -49.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 8.0% vs DOMO's -35.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -25.0% | -26.1% | -53.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.7% | -19.4% | -42.7% | -49.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.5% | +26.0% | -37.9% | -72.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.8% | +32.4% | -37.6% | -93.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.1% | +1313.7% | +184.7% | -85.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.1% | +8.0% | -14.7% | -35.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRO and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DOMO's 2.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRO currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs DOMO's 20.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.71x | 0.43x | 2.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.26 | $326.04 | $201.97 | $18.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.61 | $142.72 | $92.99 | $2.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +53.0% | +53.3% | +20.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 61.8 | 56.5 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 357K | 733K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRO as "Buy", APPF as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", DOMO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 115.2% upside for DOMO (target: $8) vs 24.9% for PRO (target: $29).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.05 | $236.67 | $168.08 | $8.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 13 | 41 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +2.6% | +2.3% |
APPF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PCTY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs DOMO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for Domo, Inc. (DOMO). Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) offers the better valuation at 26. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO?
On trailing P/E, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the cheapest at 26.
8x versus AppFolio, Inc. at 44. 5x. On forward P/E, Paylocity Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +32. 4%, compared to -93. 4% for Domo, Inc. (DOMO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1247% versus DOMO's -85. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Domo, Inc. 's 2. 63β — meaning DOMO is approximately 515% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 18% for Paylocity Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 0. 6% for Domo, Inc. (DOMO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PROS Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 64. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 1% for AppFolio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO?
AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus -18. 6% for Domo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCTY leads at 19. 1% versus -12. 3% for DOMO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOMO leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) trades at 13.
2x forward P/E versus 27. 6x for PROS Holdings, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOMO: 115. 2% to $8. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PRO or APPF or PCTY or DOMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1247% 10Y return). Domo, Inc. (DOMO) carries a higher beta of 2. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1247%, DOMO: -85. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRO and APPF and PCTY and DOMO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOMO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.