Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PSBD vs TPVG vs ARCC vs HTGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
PSBD vs TPVG vs ARCC vs HTGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $344M | $243M | $13.61B | $3.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $111M | $97M | $3.15B | $547M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $-12M | $1.15B | $289M |
| Gross Margin | 85.1% | 83.5% | 75.7% | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | 42.2% | 77.9% | 69.7% | 66.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 6.5x | 9.9x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $717M | $469M | $15.99B | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $20M | $924M | $57M |
PSBD vs TPVG vs ARCC vs HTGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palmer Square Capit… (PSBD) | 100 | 67.3 | -32.7% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 53.4 | -46.6% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 94.7 | -5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSBD vs TPVG vs ARCC vs HTGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSBD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 15.6%
- Beta 0.63, yield 15.6%, current ratio 0.09x
- NIM 55.9% vs ARCC's 3.6%
- Beta 0.63 vs TPVG's 0.83
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs PSBD's 0.8%
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 8.4x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs PSBD's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.96 vs TPVG's 6.41
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 171.6% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 139.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, current ratio 1.44x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs PSBD's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 8.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs PSBD's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs TPVG's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 15.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs ARCC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs PSBD's 0.4% |
PSBD vs TPVG vs ARCC vs HTGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HTGC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PSBD leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • ARCC leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTGC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 32.4x TPVG's $97M. HTGC is the more profitable business, keeping 62.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSBD's -2.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $111M | $97M | $3.1B | $547M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | -$22M | $2.0B | $381M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | -$12M | $1.1B | $289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29.1B | $35M | $1.1B | -$352M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.1% | +83.5% | +75.7% | +87.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.2% | +77.9% | +69.7% | +66.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +50.6% | +41.3% | +62.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +144.5% | -58.7% | +36.3% | -77.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | -2.3% | -63.9% | -20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PSBD and TPVG each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 52% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARCC offers better value at 0.99x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $344M | $243M | $13.6B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $691M | $28.7B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -111.66x | 4.91x | 10.19x | 8.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.24x | 6.50x | 9.92x | 8.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | 0.99x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.59x | 9.13x | 13.09x | 14.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 2.50x | 4.33x | 5.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 0.68x | 0.93x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.14x | — | 11.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TPVG and HTGC each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTGC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. HTGC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSBD's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSBD scores 5/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | -3.4% | +8.1% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | -1.5% | +3.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +7.2% | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +9.4% | +7.5% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.54x | 1.33x | 1.12x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $713M | $449M | $15.1B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $20M | $924M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $717M | $469M | $16.0B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.45x | -1.02x | 2.98x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTGC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCC five years ago would be worth $14,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs ARCC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTGC at 17.9% vs PSBD's -2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -6.3% | -4.9% | -10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | +19.3% | +0.4% | +6.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.7% | -3.4% | +34.2% | +63.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.7% | -13.5% | +47.0% | +46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.7% | +93.3% | +139.2% | +171.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.6% | -1.2% | +10.3% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PSBD and HTGC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PSBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTGC currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs PSBD's 73.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.83x | 0.77x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.98 | $7.53 | $23.42 | $19.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.34 | $4.48 | $17.40 | $13.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.5% | +79.5% | +81.0% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 58.3 | 56.7 | 64.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 95K | 504K | 7.5M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PSBD and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSBD as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", ARCC as "Buy", HTGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 9.0% for PSBD (target: $12). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $8.95 | $21.88 | $18.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 32 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.6% | +17.1% | +2.0% | +8.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.72 | $1.02 | $0.38 | $1.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HTGC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
PSBD vs TPVG vs ARCC vs HTGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. (PSBD). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ares Capital Corporation wins at 0. 96x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC?
Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +47.
0%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HTGC returned +171. 6% versus PSBD's -7. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.
(PSBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 33% more volatile than PSBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 154% for Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 0. 8% for Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. (PSBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC?
Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 1% net margin versus -2. 9% for Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 42. 2% for PSBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTGC leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is PSBD or TPVG or ARCC or HTGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), 8. 6% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTGC: +171. 6%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSBD and TPVG and ARCC and HTGC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSBD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.