PSX
Phillips 66
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Cap$72.27B
5Y Perf.+130.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PSX vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$656.38B
5Y Perf.+240.6%
PSX vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PSX | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $72.27B | $656.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $135.77B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.12B | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 7.0% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $22.88B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.12B | $10.68B |
PSX vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PSX
XOM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phillips 66 (PSX) | 100 | 230.3 | +130.3% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 340.6 | +240.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSX vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XOM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Phillips 66 is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PSX
Phillips 66
The Income Pick
PSX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.43, yield 2.6%
- 174.6% 10Y total return vs XOM's 115.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 75.7%, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- -4.5% revenue growth vs PSX's -7.6%
- 8.9% margin vs PSX's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XOM | -4.5% revenue growth vs PSX's -7.6% |
| Value | PSX | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 15.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | XOM | 8.9% margin vs PSX's 3.0% |
| Stability / Safety | XOM | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 75.7%) |
| Dividends | PSX | 2.6% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PSX | +73.2% vs XOM's +53.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs PSX's 5.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs 5.3% |
PSX vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PSX vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPSXLAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
2leads
PSXPhillips 66
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
XOM5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PSX5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XOM5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PSX5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 2.4x PSX's $135.8B. XOM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSX's 3.0%. On growth, PSX holds the edge at +11.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PSXPhillips 66 | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $135.8B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.4B | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.1B | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.7% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.8% | -11.0% |
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PSX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, PSX trades at a 28% valuation discount to XOM's 23.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XOM's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSX's 13.8x.
| Metric | PSXPhillips 66 | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72.3B | $656.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94.0B | $689.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.71x | 23.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.25x | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.79x | 11.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 2.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.43x | 2.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.48x | 27.80x |
PSX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSX delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSX's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSX scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PSXPhillips 66 | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.1% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.8B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.9B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.65x | 69.44x |
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $28,473 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,707 for PSX. Over the past 12 months, PSX leads with a +73.2% total return vs XOM's +53.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSX at 27.6% vs XOM's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PSXPhillips 66 | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.0% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.2% | +53.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.5% | +53.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.1% | +184.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.6% | +115.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.6% | +15.3% |
PSX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PSX and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSX's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSX currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 87.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PSXPhillips 66 | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $190.61 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $104.83 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 18.8M |
Evenly matched — PSX and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PSX and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PSX as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.6% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -9.4% for PSX (target: $163). For income investors, PSX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs XOM's 2.58%.
| Metric | PSXPhillips 66 | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $163.38 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.71 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +3.1% |
Evenly matched — PSX and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
XOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallPhillips 66 (PSX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PSX vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSX or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 6% for Phillips 66 (PSX). Phillips 66 (PSX) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phillips 66 (PSX) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSX or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Phillips 66 (PSX) is the cheapest at 16.
7x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Phillips 66 is actually cheaper at 12. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSX or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +184.
7%, compared to +137. 1% for Phillips 66 (PSX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PSX returned +174. 6% versus XOM's +115. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSX or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Phillips 66's 0. 43β — meaning PSX is approximately -395% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 76% for Phillips 66 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSX or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -7. 6% for Phillips 66 (PSX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phillips 66 grew EPS 116. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSX or XOM?
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus 3. 3% for Phillips 66 — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus 2. 7% for PSX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSX or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phillips 66 (PSX) trades at 12.
3x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 3. 6% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSX or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Phillips 66 (PSX) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 6% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is PSX or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +115. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +115. 7%, PSX: +174. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSX and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PSX: 11.7% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(PSX: 3.0% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PSX: 16.7x · XOM: 23.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.