Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PTHS vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
PTHS vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $15M | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -300.5% | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $513K | $357M |
PTHS vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelthos Therapeutic… (PTHS) | 100 | 205.6 | +105.6% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 792.6 | +692.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTHS vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTHS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.68
- EPS growth -5.8%
- 119.6% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
PRAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- -100.0% revenue growth vs PTHS's -114.7%
- 2.4% margin vs PTHS's -318.4%
- +7.7% vs PTHS's +119.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -100.0% revenue growth vs PTHS's -114.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs PTHS's -318.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs PTHS's +119.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -18.7% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2% |
PTHS vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTHS vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTHS and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $7M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PRAX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.91x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTHS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTHS delivers a -40.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-40 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTHS scores 4/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.5% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.7% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $513,443 | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.31x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTHS five years ago would be worth $21,958 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs PTHS's +119.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs PTHS's 30.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +119.6% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.0% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTHS and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs PTHS's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.29 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.20 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.7% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% |
PRAX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PTHS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PTHS vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTHS or PRAX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PTHS or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Pelthos Therapeutics Inc.
(PTHS) delivered a total return of +119. 6%, compared to -20. 8% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTHS returned +119. 6% versus PRAX's -20. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PTHS or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pelthos Therapeutics Inc.
(PTHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 127% more volatile than PTHS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PTHS or PRAX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pelthos Therapeutics Inc.
grew EPS -5. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PTHS or PRAX?
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -318. 4% for Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAX leads at 0. 0% versus -300. 5% for PTHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTHS leads at 54. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PTHS or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PTHS or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pelthos Therapeutics Inc.
(PTHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), +119. 6% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTHS: +119. 6%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PTHS and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.