Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PTLO vs NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PTLO
Portillo's Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$310M
5Y Perf.-88.7%
NATH
Nathan's Famous, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$952M
5Y Perf.+62.2%
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.82B
5Y Perf.+1.4%
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$82M
5Y Perf.-81.2%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.70B
5Y Perf.+99.8%

PTLO vs NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PTLO logoPTLO
NATH logoNATH
SHAK logoSHAK
RRGB logoRRGB
TXRH logoTXRH
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$310M$952M$2.82B$82M$11.70B
Revenue (TTM)$738M$158M$1.49B$1.21B$6.06B
Net Income (TTM)$16M$21M$41M$-23M$415M
Gross Margin29.0%29.4%7.5%26.8%18.7%
Operating Margin6.1%20.1%4.3%0.2%8.2%
Forward P/E22.2x17.3x54.4x28.1x
Total Debt$999M$56M$902M$514M$1.89B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$28M$360M$20M$135M

PTLO vs NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PTLO
NATH
SHAK
RRGB
TXRH
StockOct 21May 26Return
Portillo's Inc. (PTLO)10011.3-88.7%
Nathan's Famous, In… (NATH)100162.2+62.2%
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)100101.4+1.4%
Red Robin Gourmet B… (RRGB)10018.8-81.2%
Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH)100199.8+99.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PTLO vs NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NATH leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Shake Shack Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. RRGB also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PTLO
Portillo's Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

PTLO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
NATH
Nathan's Famous, Inc.
The Income Pick

NATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
  • Beta 0.52, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.69x
  • Lower P/E (17.3x vs 54.4x)
  • 13.6% margin vs RRGB's -1.9%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
The Growth Play

SHAK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1%
Best for: growth exposure
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RRGB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +33.2% vs PTLO's -62.3%
Best for: momentum
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TXRH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 331.7% 10Y total return vs NATH's 163.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 0.50x
  • PEG 0.41 vs NATH's 1.33
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHAK logoSHAK15.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1%
ValueNATH logoNATHLower P/E (17.3x vs 54.4x)
Quality / MarginsNATH logoNATH13.6% margin vs RRGB's -1.9%
Stability / SafetyNATH logoNATHBeta 0.52 vs RRGB's 2.08
DividendsNATH logoNATH2.0% yield, vs TXRH's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RRGB logoRRGB+33.2% vs PTLO's -62.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NATH logoNATH42.1% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 227.7% vs 0.5%

PTLO vs NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PTLOPortillo's Inc.
FY 2025
Gift Card
100.0%$4M
NATHNathan's Famous, Inc.
FY 2024
Branded Products
62.0%$92M
License
25.3%$37M
Company-operated Restaurants
8.6%$13M
Franchise Royalties
2.5%$4M
Advertising Fund Revenue
1.4%$2M
Franchise
0.3%$381,000
SHAKShake Shack Inc.
FY 2025
Shack Sales
96.3%$1.4B
Sales-Based Royalties
3.6%$52M
Initial Territory and Opening Fees
0.2%$3M
RRGBRed Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
98.3%$1.2B
Franchise
1.2%$14M
Products And Services, Gift Card Breakage
0.4%$5M
Products And Services, Gift Card
0.1%$1M
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$5.8B
Franchise royalties
0.5%$28M
Franchise fees
0.0%$3M

PTLO vs NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNATHLAGGINGSHAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NATH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 38.4x NATH's $158M. NATH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RRGB's -1.9%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPTLO logoPTLOPortillo's Inc.NATH logoNATHNathan's Famous, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$738M$158M$1.5B$1.2B$6.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$75M$33M$173M$54M$709M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$16M$21M$41M-$23M$415M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$9M$22M$37M$6M$361M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.0%+29.4%+7.5%+26.8%+18.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.1%+20.1%+4.3%+0.2%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.1%+13.6%+2.8%-1.9%+6.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.2%+14.0%+2.5%+0.5%+5.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.5%+8.9%+14.3%-5.7%+12.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-111.2%-31.8%-110.0%+77.4%+10.0%
NATH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RRGB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.9x trailing earnings, PTLO trades at a 75% valuation discount to SHAK's 64.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.42x vs NATH's 1.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPTLO logoPTLOPortillo's Inc.NATH logoNATHNathan's Famous, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Market CapShares × price$310M$952M$2.8B$82M$11.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$980M$3.4B$576M$13.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.93x17.27x64.35x-2.85x29.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.21x54.41x28.11x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.33x0.42x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.06x26.16x17.50x10.69x18.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.42x6.42x1.95x0.07x1.99x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.61x5.30x7.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF38.04x49.97x13.21x34.19x
RRGB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NATH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TXRH delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $3 for PTLO. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTLO's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs PTLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPTLO logoPTLOPortillo's Inc.NATH logoNATHNathan's Famous, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+7.6%+27.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+42.1%+2.2%-4.1%+12.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.0%+2.3%+6.0%+0.5%+14.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.7%+104.3%+5.4%+0.7%+20.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936754
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.01x1.63x1.27x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$980M$28M$542M$494M$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$28M$360M$20M$135M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$999M$56M$902M$514M$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.78x11.11x16.87x0.26x
NATH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $18,576 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,089 for RRGB. Over the past 12 months, RRGB leads with a +33.2% total return vs PTLO's -62.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 19.7% vs PTLO's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPTLO logoPTLOPortillo's Inc.NATH logoNATHNathan's Famous, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.3%+10.8%-16.0%-9.9%+4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-62.3%+3.8%-32.1%+33.2%+4.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.7%+50.4%+4.8%-70.0%+71.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.2%+69.5%-21.9%-89.1%+85.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.2%+163.4%+100.7%-94.3%+331.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-40.3%+14.6%+1.6%-33.1%+19.7%
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NATH and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRGB's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXRH currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs PTLO's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPTLO logoPTLOPortillo's Inc.NATH logoNATHNathan's Famous, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.25x0.52x1.81x2.08x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.55$118.50$144.65$7.89$199.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.27$88.67$67.20$2.46$153.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.7%+85.6%+48.5%+47.3%+88.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10030.859.223.850.942.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M24K1.5M309K1.0M
Evenly matched — NATH and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NATH and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PTLO as "Hold", SHAK as "Hold", RRGB as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 87.7% upside for RRGB (target: $7) vs 6.2% for TXRH (target: $188). For income investors, NATH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs TXRH's 1.53%.

MetricPTLO logoPTLOPortillo's Inc.NATH logoNATHNathan's Famous, …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.63$104.60$7.00$188.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts12353843
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises005
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.00$2.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.3%
Evenly matched — NATH and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NATH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RRGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PTLO vs NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?

On trailing P/E, Portillo's Inc.

(PTLO) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 64. 3x. On forward P/E, Portillo's Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?

Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) delivered a total return of +85. 8%, compared to -89. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +331. 7% versus RRGB's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nathan's Famous, Inc.

(NATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning RRGB is approximately 300% more volatile than NATH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 2% for Portillo's Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -41. 3% for Portillo's Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHAK leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?

Nathan's Famous, Inc.

(NATH) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -1. 9% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATH leads at 24. 6% versus 0. 2% for RRGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRGB leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Portillo's Inc.

(PTLO) trades at 22. 2x forward P/E versus 54. 4x for Shake Shack Inc. — 32. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRGB: 87. 7% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?

In this comparison, NATH (2.

0% yield), TXRH (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. PTLO, SHAK, RRGB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PTLO or NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nathan's Famous, Inc.

(NATH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 0% yield, +163. 4% 10Y return). Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NATH: +163. 4%, RRGB: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PTLO and NATH and SHAK and RRGB and TXRH?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PTLO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NATH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; RRGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NATH, TXRH pay a dividend while PTLO, SHAK, RRGB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PTLO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NATH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHAK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RRGB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXRH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PTLO and NATH and SHAK and RRGB and TXRH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PTLO: 3.5% · NATH: 8.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(PTLO: 2.1% · NATH: 13.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PTLO: 15.9x · NATH: 17.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.