Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PTRN vs PRCH vs TASK vs AMZN vs CNXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Specialty Retail
Technology Distributors
PTRN vs PRCH vs TASK vs AMZN vs CNXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Specialty Retail | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $2.97B | $1.25B | $484M | $2.65T | $1.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $483M | $1.21B | $742.78B | $2.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-141M | $-9M | $105M | $90.80B | $87M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 72.4% | 35.5% | 50.6% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 10.3% | 11.6% | 11.5% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 34.7x | — | 4.0x | 28.0x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $31M | $393M | $298M | $152.99B | $996K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $53M | $212M | $86.81B | $193M |
PTRN vs PRCH vs TASK vs AMZN vs CNXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) | 100 | 58.9 | -41.1% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
| PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) | 100 | 152.9 | +52.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTRN vs PRCH vs TASK vs AMZN vs CNXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTRN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 39.3% revenue growth vs CNXN's 2.5%
- +22.6% vs TASK's -46.2%
Among these 5 stocks, PRCH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TASK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- PEG 0.16 vs CNXN's 1.99
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.16 vs 1.99
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs CNXN's 219.8%
- 12.2% margin vs PTRN's -5.2%
- 11.5% ROA vs PTRN's -16.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 6.8%
CNXN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.73, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.73 vs PRCH's 2.15, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.3% revenue growth vs CNXN's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.16 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs PTRN's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs PRCH's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.6% vs TASK's -46.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs PTRN's -16.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 6.8% |
PTRN vs PRCH vs TASK vs AMZN vs CNXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTRN vs PRCH vs TASK vs AMZN vs CNXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CNXN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TASK leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • PTRN leads 0 • PRCH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PTRN and PRCH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1538.5x PRCH's $483M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTRN's -5.2%. On growth, PTRN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $483M | $1.2B | $742.8B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $72M | $204M | $155.9B | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$141M | -$9M | $105M | $90.8B | $87M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $72M | $88M | -$2.5B | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +72.4% | +35.5% | +50.6% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +10.3% | +11.6% | +11.5% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -1.8% | +8.7% | +12.2% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +15.0% | +7.3% | -0.3% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.2% | +15.6% | +10.3% | +16.6% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.0% | -157.1% | +13.0% | +74.8% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TASK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 86% valuation discount to AMZN's 34.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.19x vs CNXN's 2.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $1.2B | $484M | $2.65T | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $1.6B | $570M | $2.71T | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.54x | -351.85x | 4.87x | 34.31x | 21.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.70x | — | 4.02x | 27.98x | 18.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.19x | 1.23x | 2.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 64.31x | 27.75x | 2.82x | 18.61x | 13.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 2.59x | 0.41x | 3.69x | 0.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.82x | 52.80x | 0.83x | 6.48x | 1.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.66x | 23.96x | 6.56x | 343.80x | 30.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-61 for PRCH. CNXN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRCH's 17.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRCH scores 8/9 vs CNXN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.2% | -60.9% | +21.2% | +23.3% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.3% | -1.1% | +10.3% | +11.5% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +9.9% | +16.3% | +14.7% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +6.5% | +16.7% | +15.3% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 17.55x | 0.50x | 0.37x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$258M | $340M | $86M | $66.2B | -$192M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $53M | $212M | $86.8B | $193M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31M | $393M | $298M | $153.0B | $996,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.35x | 7.12x | 39.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PTRN and PRCH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNXN five years ago would be worth $15,047 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,066 for TASK. Over the past 12 months, PTRN leads with a +22.6% total return vs TASK's -46.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRCH at 100.2% vs TASK's -7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.7% | +23.6% | -21.1% | +8.6% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.6% | +1.3% | -46.2% | +13.8% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | +702.8% | -20.7% | +96.0% | +58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | -37.0% | -69.3% | +44.1% | +50.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | +15.2% | -71.0% | +585.6% | +219.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.0% | +100.2% | -7.4% | +25.2% | +16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CNXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNXN is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRCH's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNXN currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 29.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 2.15x | 1.40x | 1.43x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.40 | $19.44 | $18.39 | $278.56 | $75.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.92 | $6.36 | $5.30 | $197.28 | $54.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +58.6% | +29.1% | +88.3% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 58.5 | 34.2 | 43.3 | 57.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.8M | 590K | 43.0M | 83K |
Analyst Outlook
CNXN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTRN as "Buy", PRCH as "Buy", TASK as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", CNXN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.9% upside for TASK (target: $11) vs -18.2% for PRCH (target: $9). CNXN is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | $9.33 | $10.50 | $307.77 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 13 | 11 | 94 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.7% | 0.0% | +4.3% |
CNXN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). TASK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PTRN vs PRCH vs TASK vs AMZN vs CNXN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pattern Group Inc.
Series A Common Stock (PTRN) is the stronger pick with 39. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (4. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 34. 3x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN?
Over the past 5 years, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) delivered a total return of +50. 5%, compared to -69. 3% for TaskUs, Inc. (TASK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +585. 6% versus TASK's -71. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Porch Group, Inc. 's 2. 15β — meaning PRCH is approximately 196% more volatile than CNXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 18% for Porch Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pattern Group Inc.
Series A Common Stock (PTRN) is pulling ahead at 39. 3% versus 2. 5% for PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -0. 6% for PC Connection, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRCH leads at 20. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 0. 6% for Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TASK leads at 11. 9% versus 1. 0% for PTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRCH leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock — 30. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TASK: 95. 9% to $10. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN?
In this comparison, CNXN (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. PTRN, PRCH, TASK, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PTRN or PRCH or TASK or AMZN or CNXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 0. 9% yield, +219. 8% 10Y return). Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXN: +219. 8%, PRCH: +15. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTRN and PRCH and TASK and AMZN and CNXN?
These companies operate in different sectors (PTRN (Technology) and PRCH (Technology) and TASK (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and CNXN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PTRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CNXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CNXN pays a dividend while PTRN, PRCH, TASK, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.