Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
QCRH vs FBIZ vs MBWM vs NBTB vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
QCRH vs FBIZ vs MBWM vs NBTB vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.53B | $473M | $898M | $2.35B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $597M | $279M | $372M | $867M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $127M | $51M | $89M | $169M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 57.7% | 57.3% | 64.0% | 72.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 21.6% | 27.5% | 25.3% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 9.1x | 9.5x | 10.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $618M | $259M | $826M | $327M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $31M | $473M | $185M | $599M |
QCRH vs FBIZ vs MBWM vs NBTB vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) | 100 | 301.2 | +201.2% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 226.7 | +126.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QCRH vs FBIZ vs MBWM vs NBTB vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QCRH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 257.6% 10Y total return vs FBIZ's 161.7%
- +39.1% vs FIS's -35.3%
FBIZ is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.3% vs QCRH's 2.7%
- 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%
MBWM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.4% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 5.5% vs 7.9%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs QCRH's 1.5%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs QCRH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs QCRH's 0.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.1% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 5.5% vs 7.9% |
QCRH vs FBIZ vs MBWM vs NBTB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QCRH vs FBIZ vs MBWM vs NBTB vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 1 • QCRH leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBWM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 39.0x FBIZ's $279M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $597M | $279M | $372M | $867M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $145M | $49M | $107M | $241M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $127M | $51M | $89M | $169M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $354M | $53M | $11M | $225M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.7% | +57.3% | +64.0% | +72.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +21.6% | +27.5% | +25.3% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +18.0% | +23.9% | +19.5% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.3% | +21.9% | +3.0% | +25.2% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +12.9% | +14.8% | +39.5% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $473M | $898M | $2.4B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $702M | $1.3B | $2.5B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.16x | 9.36x | 9.53x | 13.53x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.20x | 9.15x | 9.54x | 10.80x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.83x | 0.37x | 0.63x | 1.92x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.25x | 11.61x | 11.75x | 10.35x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.57x | 1.69x | 2.42x | 2.71x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 1.25x | 1.17x | 1.21x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.32x | 7.74x | 80.15x | 10.75x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FBIZ and NBTB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +14.1% | +13.5% | +9.5% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +7.0% | +5.5% | +7.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +2.6% | +8.0% | +2.4% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.70x | 1.14x | 0.17x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $541M | $229M | $353M | $142M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $31M | $473M | $185M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $618M | $259M | $826M | $327M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 0.42x | 0.79x | 1.05x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QCRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, QCRH leads with a +39.1% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QCRH at 34.7% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.5% | +7.1% | +10.1% | +9.3% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.1% | +21.0% | +23.6% | +9.0% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.5% | +136.5% | +127.3% | +54.1% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.7% | +130.9% | +78.4% | +29.9% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.6% | +161.7% | +178.2% | +102.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.7% | +33.2% | +31.5% | +15.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QCRH's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.81x | 0.87x | 0.89x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.00 | $60.54 | $55.77 | $46.92 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.68 | $45.90 | $42.17 | $39.20 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +93.7% | +93.3% | +96.1% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 49.1 | 53.1 | 57.3 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 114K | 39K | 112K | 236K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIZ and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QCRH as "Buy", FBIZ as "Buy", MBWM as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs QCRH's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.00 | $67.00 | $57.00 | $46.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.1% | +2.8% | +3.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 6 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $1.19 | $1.47 | $1.43 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FBIZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
QCRH vs FBIZ vs MBWM vs NBTB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCRH returned +257. 6% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus QCR Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning QCRH is approximately 26% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 1. 5% for QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Business Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 16. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for QCR Holdings, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 3% for QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH).
09Is QCRH or FBIZ or MBWM or NBTB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 1% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBIZ: +161. 7%, QCRH: +257. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QCRH and FBIZ and MBWM and NBTB and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (QCRH (Financial Services) and FBIZ (Financial Services) and MBWM (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: QCRH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FBIZ, MBWM, NBTB, FIS pay a dividend while QCRH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.