Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QLYS vs VRNS vs CYBR vs TENB vs SAIL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QLYS
Qualys, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.34B
5Y Perf.-27.8%
VRNS
Varonis Systems, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.37B
5Y Perf.-33.3%
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$20.64B
5Y Perf.+18.4%
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.-43.5%
SAIL
SailPoint, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.85B
5Y Perf.-49.2%

QLYS vs VRNS vs CYBR vs TENB vs SAIL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QLYS logoQLYS
VRNS logoVRNS
CYBR logoCYBR
TENB logoTENB
SAIL logoSAIL
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$3.34B$3.37B$20.64B$2.47B$6.85B
Revenue (TTM)$685M$660M$1.36B$1.02B$1.02B
Net Income (TTM)$201M$-137M$-147M$-12M$-297M
Gross Margin83.1%78.1%74.3%78.2%66.0%
Operating Margin33.7%-21.9%-7.7%2.9%-16.4%
Forward P/E12.9x242.2x81.9x11.1x
Total Debt$97M$572M$1.22B$466M$1.05B
Cash & Equiv.$250M$202M$623M$188M$121M

QLYS vs VRNS vs CYBR vs TENB vs SAILLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QLYS
VRNS
CYBR
TENB
SAIL
StockFeb 25May 26Return
Qualys, Inc. (QLYS)10072.2-27.8%
Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS)10066.7-33.3%
CyberArk Software L… (CYBR)100118.4+18.4%
Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB)10056.5-43.5%
SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL)10050.8-49.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QLYS vs VRNS vs CYBR vs TENB vs SAIL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: QLYS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. CyberArk Software Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. TENB also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
QLYS
Qualys, Inc.
The Income Pick

QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.53
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.41x
  • 29.4% margin vs SAIL's -29.2%
  • Beta 0.53 vs SAIL's 1.81
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
VRNS
Varonis Systems, Inc.
The Technology Pick

VRNS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

CYBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.

  • 9.0% 10Y total return vs VRNS's 317.5%
  • Beta 0.92, current ratio 2.00x
  • 36.0% revenue growth vs QLYS's 10.1%
  • +13.3% vs VRNS's -36.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

TENB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
SAIL
SailPoint, Inc.
The Growth Play

SAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 72.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.1%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCYBR logoCYBR36.0% revenue growth vs QLYS's 10.1%
ValueTENB logoTENBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsQLYS logoQLYS29.4% margin vs SAIL's -29.2%
Stability / SafetyQLYS logoQLYSBeta 0.53 vs SAIL's 1.81
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CYBR logoCYBR+13.3% vs VRNS's -36.7%
Efficiency (ROA)QLYS logoQLYS19.1% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 47.5% vs -11.0%

QLYS vs VRNS vs CYBR vs TENB vs SAIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QLYSQualys, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$669M
VRNSVaronis Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Software as a Service
74.2%$463M
Subscription and Circulation
17.6%$110M
Maintenance
8.2%$51M
CYBRCyberArk Software Ltd.
FY 2024
Saas
46.8%$469M
Self Hosted Subscription
26.4%$265M
Maintenance and support
19.7%$197M
Professional services
5.6%$56M
Perpetual License
1.4%$14M
TENBTenable Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
92.0%$920M
License and Maintenance
4.5%$45M
Service, Other
3.5%$35M
SAILSailPoint, Inc.
FY 2022
Subscription
62.2%$273M
License
25.7%$113M
Technology Service
12.0%$53M

QLYS vs VRNS vs CYBR vs TENB vs SAIL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQLYSLAGGINGSAIL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CYBR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.1x VRNS's $660M. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIL's -29.2%. On growth, VRNS holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQLYS logoQLYSQualys, Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …CYBR logoCYBRCyberArk Software…TENB logoTENBTenable Holdings,…SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$685M$660M$1.4B$1.0B$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$241M-$135M$23M$72M$42M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$201M-$137M-$147M-$12M-$297M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$290M$120M$259M$263M$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+83.1%+78.1%+74.3%+78.2%+66.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.7%-21.9%-7.7%+2.9%-16.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+29.4%-20.7%-10.8%-1.2%-29.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+42.4%+18.1%+19.0%+25.7%+0.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.8%+26.9%+18.5%+9.6%+19.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.1%0.0%+83.2%+106.3%+85.4%
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TENB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, QLYS's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CYBR's 908.2x.

MetricQLYS logoQLYSQualys, Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …CYBR logoCYBRCyberArk Software…TENB logoTENBTenable Holdings,…SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.3B$3.4B$20.6B$2.5B$6.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.2B$3.7B$21.2B$2.7B$7.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.45x-25.38x-139.54x-71.80x-6.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.87x242.23x81.87x11.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.49x908.21x63.60x160.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.00x5.40x15.16x2.47x7.95x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.17x6.19x8.54x7.93x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.98x24.99x79.60x9.69x
TENB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QLYS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. QLYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TENB's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QLYS scores 6/9 vs CYBR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricQLYS logoQLYSQualys, Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …CYBR logoCYBRCyberArk Software…TENB logoTENBTenable Holdings,…SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+37.2%-27.4%-6.1%-3.7%-8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+19.1%-8.2%-3.0%-0.7%-4.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+47.5%-11.0%-3.2%+0.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+37.8%-14.0%-3.3%+0.1%-2.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965355
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.96x0.51x1.43x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$153M$369M$599M$278M$926M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$250M$202M$623M$188M$121M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$97M$572M$1.2B$466M$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.01x1.02x-0.91x
QLYS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CYBR five years ago would be worth $34,006 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,541 for SAIL. Over the past 12 months, CYBR leads with a +13.3% total return vs VRNS's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYBR at 43.4% vs SAIL's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQLYS logoQLYSQualys, Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …CYBR logoCYBRCyberArk Software…TENB logoTENBTenable Holdings,…SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-27.5%-10.5%-6.1%-5.2%-35.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.6%-36.7%+13.3%-31.2%-33.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.7%+23.7%+194.8%-41.1%-44.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.1%-39.9%+240.1%-41.9%-44.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+267.2%+317.5%+901.8%-28.8%-44.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-6.3%+7.3%+43.4%-16.2%-17.9%
CYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — QLYS and CYBR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIL's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYBR currently trades 77.7% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQLYS logoQLYSQualys, Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …CYBR logoCYBRCyberArk Software…TENB logoTENBTenable Holdings,…SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.53x0.95x0.92x1.12x1.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$155.47$63.90$526.19$35.69$24.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$74.51$19.70$347.12$15.73$10.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.1%+44.9%+77.7%+60.4%+48.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.266.138.960.143.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded773K2.3M03.0M3.1M
Evenly matched — QLYS and CYBR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: QLYS as "Hold", VRNS as "Buy", CYBR as "Buy", TENB as "Buy", SAIL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.4% upside for SAIL (target: $22) vs 12.3% for CYBR (target: $459).

MetricQLYS logoQLYSQualys, Inc.VRNS logoVRNSVaronis Systems, …CYBR logoCYBRCyberArk Software…TENB logoTENBTenable Holdings,…SAIL logoSAILSailPoint, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$134.30$36.00$459.00$27.94$21.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts4834492832
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.5%+3.4%+0.0%+10.0%+0.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

QLYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TENB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallQualys, Inc. (QLYS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QLYS vs VRNS vs CYBR vs TENB vs SAIL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.

(CYBR) is the stronger pick with 36. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL?

On forward P/E, Tenable Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 11. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL?

Over the past 5 years, CyberArk Software Ltd.

(CYBR) delivered a total return of +240. 1%, compared to -44. 6% for SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYBR returned +901. 8% versus SAIL's -44. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.

(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus SailPoint, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SAIL is approximately 241% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 143% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CyberArk Software Ltd.

(CYBR) is pulling ahead at 36. 0% versus 10. 1% for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SailPoint, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for CyberArk Software Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAIL leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL?

Qualys, Inc.

(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -36. 7% for SailPoint, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Tenable Holdings, Inc.

(TENB) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 231. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAIL: 76. 4% to $21. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is QLYS or VRNS or CYBR or TENB or SAIL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.

(CYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), +901. 8% 10Y return). SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYBR: +901. 8%, SAIL: -44. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QLYS and VRNS and CYBR and TENB and SAIL?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CYBR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

QLYS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VRNS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CYBR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TENB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAIL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform QLYS and VRNS and CYBR and TENB and SAIL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(QLYS: 9.8% · VRNS: 26.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.