Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
QMCO vs STX vs WDC vs NTAP vs PSTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Computer Hardware
Computer Hardware
Computer Hardware
QMCO vs STX vs WDC vs NTAP vs PSTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $136M | $170.65B | $162.74B | $23.37B | $21.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $261M | $11.01B | $11.78B | $6.71B | $3.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-101M | $2.38B | $6.49B | $1.21B | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 41.5% | 45.4% | 70.5% | 70.4% |
| Operating Margin | -12.9% | 28.3% | 30.8% | 22.2% | 3.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 53.1x | 48.4x | 14.8x | 29.2x |
| Total Debt | $133M | $5.37B | $5.08B | $3.49B | $216M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $891M | $2.11B | $2.74B | $855M |
QMCO vs STX vs WDC vs NTAP vs PSTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Corporation (QMCO) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
| Seagate Technology … (STX) | 100 | 1475.4 | +1375.4% |
| Western Digital Cor… (WDC) | 100 | 1431.6 | +1331.6% |
| NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) | 100 | 265.0 | +165.0% |
| Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) | 100 | 335.4 | +235.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QMCO vs STX vs WDC vs NTAP vs PSTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QMCO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
STX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.9%, EPS growth 328.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs WDC's 16.4%
WDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 50.7% revenue growth vs QMCO's -12.0%
- 55.1% margin vs QMCO's -38.6%
- +9.8% vs QMCO's -16.0%
- 44.0% ROA vs QMCO's -67.5%
NTAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 1.7%
- PEG 1.48 vs STX's 4.31
- Beta 1.33, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 29.2x)
PSTG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.34, Low D/E 15.0%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.7% revenue growth vs QMCO's -12.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 29.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.1% margin vs QMCO's -38.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs QMCO's 3.49 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STX's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.8% vs QMCO's -16.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 44.0% ROA vs QMCO's -67.5% |
QMCO vs STX vs WDC vs NTAP vs PSTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QMCO vs STX vs WDC vs NTAP vs PSTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WDC leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTAP leads 2 • QMCO leads 0 • STX leads 0 • PSTG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 45.1x QMCO's $261M. WDC is the more profitable business, keeping 55.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QMCO's -38.6%. On growth, WDC holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $261M | $11.0B | $11.8B | $6.7B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$29M | $3.4B | $4.0B | $1.6B | $263M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$101M | $2.4B | $6.5B | $1.2B | $188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$42M | $2.6B | $2.9B | $1.3B | $256M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +41.5% | +45.4% | +70.5% | +70.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +28.3% | +30.8% | +22.2% | +3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.6% | +21.6% | +55.1% | +18.1% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.2% | +23.9% | +24.7% | +19.9% | +7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +44.1% | +45.5% | +4.4% | +20.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.1% | +108.3% | +5.0% | +16.0% | +141.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NTAP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.8x trailing earnings, NTAP trades at a 85% valuation discount to PSTG's 142.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTAP offers better value at 2.08x vs STX's 9.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $136M | $170.7B | $162.7B | $23.4B | $22.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $252M | $175.1B | $165.7B | $24.1B | $21.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.43x | 115.59x | 93.75x | 20.81x | 142.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 53.08x | 48.42x | 14.79x | 29.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.40x | — | 2.08x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 81.80x | 59.50x | 15.26x | 81.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 18.76x | 17.09x | 3.56x | 6.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 32.45x | 23.72x | 16.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 208.62x | 126.74x | 17.46x | 35.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STX and PSTG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STX delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $13 for PSTG. PSTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTAP's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STX scores 7/9 vs QMCO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.2% | +91.9% | +104.7% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.5% | +27.9% | +44.0% | +12.2% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +41.4% | +13.8% | +54.4% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +37.7% | +17.5% | +22.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.96x | 3.36x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116M | $4.5B | $3.0B | $749M | -$639M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $891M | $2.1B | $2.7B | $855M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $133M | $5.4B | $5.1B | $3.5B | $216M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.06x | 10.54x | 26.57x | 14.83x | 28.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WDC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WDC five years ago would be worth $92,662 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $531 for QMCO. Over the past 12 months, WDC leads with a +984.5% total return vs QMCO's -16.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WDC at 165.0% vs QMCO's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +172.4% | +155.8% | +11.8% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.0% | +715.6% | +984.5% | +27.2% | +36.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.4% | +1305.4% | +1760.1% | +94.0% | +194.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.7% | +785.3% | +826.6% | +62.5% | +274.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | +4188.3% | +1641.9% | +487.5% | +373.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.3% | +141.3% | +165.0% | +24.7% | +43.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WDC and NTAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTAP is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QMCO's 3.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WDC currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs QMCO's 62.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.49x | 2.06x | 2.35x | 1.33x | 2.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.33 | $802.00 | $483.66 | $126.66 | $100.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.19 | $94.97 | $43.88 | $92.91 | $47.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.8% | +97.6% | +99.2% | +93.2% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 81.1 | 73.8 | 63.4 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 453K | 3.9M | 8.0M | 2.1M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
NTAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QMCO as "Buy", STX as "Buy", WDC as "Buy", NTAP as "Hold", PSTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.4% upside for PSTG (target: $87) vs -27.2% for QMCO (target: $7). For income investors, NTAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.72% vs STX's 0.35%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $652.29 | $424.46 | $120.50 | $86.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 52 | 61 | 70 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.0% | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 | $0.12 | $2.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.9% | +0.3% |
WDC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NTAP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
QMCO vs STX vs WDC vs NTAP vs PSTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the stronger pick with 50.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for Quantum Corporation (QMCO). NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quantum Corporation (QMCO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG?
On trailing P/E, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus Pure Storage, Inc. at 142. 5x. On forward P/E, NetApp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NetApp, Inc. wins at 1. 48x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 31x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG?
Over the past 5 years, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) delivered a total return of +826.
6%, compared to -94. 7% for Quantum Corporation (QMCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STX returned +41. 9% versus QMCO's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Quantum Corporation's 3. 49β — meaning QMCO is approximately 162% more volatile than NTAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for NetApp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is pulling ahead at 50.
7% versus -12. 0% for Quantum Corporation (QMCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seagate Technology Holdings plc grew EPS 328. 5% year-over-year, compared to -159. 9% for Quantum Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSTG leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG?
Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
5% net margin versus -42. 0% for Quantum Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDC leads at 24. 5% versus -15. 2% for QMCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSTG leads at 70. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 48x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 31x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 53. 1x for Seagate Technology Holdings plc — 38. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSTG: 29. 4% to $86. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG?
In this comparison, NTAP (1.
7% yield), STX (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. QMCO, WDC, PSTG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QMCO or STX or WDC or NTAP or PSTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 7% yield, +487. 5% 10Y return). Quantum Corporation (QMCO) carries a higher beta of 3. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTAP: +487. 5%, QMCO: -87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QMCO and STX and WDC and NTAP and PSTG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QMCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WDC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PSTG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NTAP pays a dividend while QMCO, STX, WDC, PSTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.