Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
QNCX vs PTCT vs RARE vs SRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
QNCX vs PTCT vs RARE vs SRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $6.11B | $2.57B | $2.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $827M | $669M | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-187M | $-609M | $65M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.7% | 83.6% | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -8.3% | -83.9% | -1.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.5x | — | 5.9x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $492M | $1.28B | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $985M | $434M | $801M |
QNCX vs PTCT vs RARE vs SRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quince Therapeutics… (QNCX) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNCX vs PTCT vs RARE vs SRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QNCX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PTCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.03
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs SRPT's 13.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, current ratio 2.35x
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SRPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 3.0% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- 1.9% ROA vs QNCX's -78.5%, ROIC -31.4% vs -485.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs QNCX's -48.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs QNCX's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs QNCX's -87.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs QNCX's -78.5%, ROIC -31.4% vs -485.6% |
QNCX vs PTCT vs RARE vs SRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
QNCX vs PTCT vs RARE vs SRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTCT leads in 3 of 6 categories
SRPT leads 1 • QNCX leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRPT and QNCX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. SRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, SRPT holds the edge at -1.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $827M | $669M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | -$37M | -$536M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$187M | -$609M | $65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$169M | -$487M | $107M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.7% | +83.6% | +34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -8.3% | -83.9% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -22.6% | -91.0% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -20.4% | -72.8% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -76.8% | -2.4% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -167.9% | -100.3% | -17.2% | +162.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RARE and SRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $6.1B | $2.6B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $5.6B | $3.4B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 9.47x | -4.48x | -2.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 5.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.27x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.53x | 3.82x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.70x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SRPT delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs QNCX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -6.1% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -78.5% | -6.8% | -45.8% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | — | -89.4% | -31.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.0% | +55.9% | -46.4% | -24.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$492M | $842M | $238M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $985M | $434M | $801M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $492M | $1.3B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.67x | -14.49x | -14.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTCT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $18,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for QNCX. Over the past 12 months, PTCT leads with a +73.3% total return vs QNCX's -87.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTCT at 9.9% vs QNCX's -57.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -95.7% | -4.0% | +10.7% | -6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.6% | +73.3% | -27.4% | -45.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +32.7% | -44.5% | -84.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +89.4% | -76.1% | -71.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +852.1% | -59.4% | +13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.2% | +9.9% | -17.8% | -46.0% |
Risk & Volatility
PTCT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTCT is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QNCX's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTCT currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs QNCX's 2.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 1.03x | 1.36x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.50 | $87.50 | $42.37 | $44.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $39.53 | $18.29 | $10.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.8% | +84.2% | +61.6% | +45.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 40.0 | 67.7 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49.4M | 1.1M | 1.8M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTCT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 26.7% for SRPT (target: $25).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $98.00 | $48.36 | $25.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 33 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
PTCT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SRPT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
QNCX vs PTCT vs RARE vs SRPT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 6% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -99. 6% for Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus QNCX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Quince Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning QNCX is approximately 119% more volatile than PTCT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 15. 6% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 85.
1% to $48. 36.
07Which pays a better dividend — QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is QNCX or PTCT or RARE or SRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, QNCX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between QNCX and PTCT and RARE and SRPT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QNCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.