Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QTRX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NTRA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QTRX
Quanterix Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$129M
5Y Perf.-92.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.63B
5Y Perf.-36.5%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-51.4%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+226.8%

QTRX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NTRA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QTRX logoQTRX
PRAX logoPRAX
ACAD logoACAD
NTRA logoNTRA
IndustryMedical - DevicesBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$129M$9.63B$3.86B$31.16B
Revenue (TTM)$145M$-92K$1.10B$2.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-104M$-327M$376M$-208M
Gross Margin44.1%91.5%64.8%
Operating Margin-96.4%7.4%-13.4%
Forward P/E50.9x
Total Debt$37M$110K$52M$214M
Cash & Equiv.$30M$357M$178M$1.08B

QTRX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NTRALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QTRX
PRAX
ACAD
NTRA
StockOct 20May 26Return
Quanterix Corporati… (QTRX)1007.5-92.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10063.5-36.5%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10048.6-51.4%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100326.8+226.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QTRX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NTRA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Natera, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
QTRX
Quanterix Corporation
The Secondary Option

QTRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • +7.7% vs QTRX's -48.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Value Play

ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 34.3% margin vs QTRX's -71.9%
  • 26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0%
Best for: value and quality
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Income Pick

NTRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 1.26
  • Rev growth 35.9%, EPS growth 0.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
  • Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.39x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTRA logoNTRA35.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueACAD logoACADBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs QTRX's -71.9%
Stability / SafetyNTRA logoNTRABeta 1.26 vs QTRX's 1.98, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs QTRX's -48.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0%

QTRX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NTRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QTRXQuanterix Corporation
FY 2025
Product
66.9%$93M
Service And Other Revenue
31.8%$44M
License and Service
1.1%$2M
Grant
0.2%$243,000
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M

QTRX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NTRA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACADLAGGINGNTRA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NTRA and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QTRX's -71.9%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$145M-$92,000$1.1B$2.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$125M-$357M$96M-$310M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$104M-$327M$376M-$208M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$83M-$283M$212M$97M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.1%+91.5%+64.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-96.4%+7.4%-13.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-71.9%+34.3%-9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-57.2%+19.4%+4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.3%+9.7%+39.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.2%+2.7%-81.8%+185.4%
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QTRX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$129M$9.6B$3.9B$31.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$136M$9.3B$3.7B$30.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.10x-24.72x9.85x-144.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.50.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.93x3.61x13.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.40x8.54x3.15x17.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.74x285.53x
QTRX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QTRX's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs QTRX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-35.2%-43.0%+35.6%-15.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-26.0%-40.2%+26.2%-10.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.4%-65.0%+10.0%-36.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-24.7%-49.3%+10.1%-18.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92365
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.00x0.04x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7M-$357M-$126M-$862M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$357M$178M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$37M$110,000$52M$214M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-25.21x
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $490 for QTRX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs QTRX's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs QTRX's -45.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-57.2%+16.4%-13.7%-3.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-48.7%+775.0%+52.4%+37.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.1%+1976.5%+4.7%+314.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.1%-20.8%+7.1%+115.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.3%-20.1%-22.9%+2089.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.8%+174.9%+1.5%+60.6%
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRAX and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NTRA is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QTRX's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs QTRX's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.98x1.55x1.26x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.77$356.00$27.81$256.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.56$35.18$14.45$131.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.4%+93.6%+81.1%+85.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.355.644.257.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded937K378K1.8M1.3M
Evenly matched — PRAX and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: QTRX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 19.4% for NTRA (target: $263).

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$544.40$34.78$262.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts10163727
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QTRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QTRX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NTRA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the stronger pick with 35. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -95. 1% for Quanterix Corporation (QTRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus QTRX's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Quanterix Corporation's 1. 98β — meaning QTRX is approximately 57% more volatile than NTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Quanterix Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is pulling ahead at 35. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -151. 0% for Quanterix Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -77. 1% for Quanterix Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -62. 9% for QTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63.

3% to $544. 40.

07

Which pays a better dividend — QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is QTRX or PRAX or ACAD or NTRA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTRA: +20. 9%, QTRX: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between QTRX and PRAX and ACAD and NTRA?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

QTRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform QTRX and PRAX and ACAD and NTRA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(QTRX: 20.3% · PRAX: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.