Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
QTTB vs TERN vs AKRO vs ALNY vs MDGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
QTTB vs TERN vs AKRO vs ALNY vs MDGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $161M | $4.77B | $4.50B | $37.74B | $11.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $4.29B | $1.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-96M | $-293M | $577M | $-309M |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | — | — | 80.9% | 93.1% |
| Operating Margin | 39.8% | — | — | 17.5% | -27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 5.2x | — | — | 37.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $15M | $919K | $36M | $1.28B | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $525M | $340M | $1.66B | $199M |
QTTB vs TERN vs AKRO vs ALNY vs MDGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) | 100 | 6.5 | -93.5% |
| Terns Pharmaceutica… (TERN) | 100 | 233.7 | +133.7% |
| Akero Therapeutics,… (AKRO) | 100 | 178.8 | +78.8% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 191.0 | +91.0% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 396.7 | +296.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QTTB vs TERN vs AKRO vs ALNY vs MDGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QTTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 61.9% margin vs MDGL's -27.3%
- 53.3% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1%
TERN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 62.41x
- +12.5% vs ALNY's -7.2%
AKRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.32
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 19.38x
- Beta 0.32 vs ALNY's 0.60, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, ALNY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MDGL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 432.1%, EPS growth 41.3%
- 39.4% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 366.4%
- 432.1% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 61.9% margin vs MDGL's -27.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs ALNY's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs ALNY's -7.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 53.3% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1% |
QTTB vs TERN vs AKRO vs ALNY vs MDGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
QTTB vs TERN vs AKRO vs ALNY vs MDGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QTTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
TERN leads 1 • AKRO leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • MDGL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and AKRO operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. QTTB is the more profitable business, keeping 61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDGL's -27.3%. On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $0 | $0 | $4.3B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | -$110M | -$318M | $677M | -$312M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$96M | -$293M | $577M | -$309M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$82M | -$250M | $641M | -$272M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.5% | — | — | +80.9% | +93.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | — | — | +17.5% | -27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +61.9% | — | — | +13.5% | -27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.0% | — | — | +15.0% | -24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +96.4% | +126.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | 0.0% | +5.7% | +4.4% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, QTTB trades at a 96% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QTTB's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 67.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $4.8B | $4.5B | $37.7B | $11.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $129M | $4.2B | $4.2B | $37.4B | $11.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.22x | -51.41x | -14.57x | 121.39x | -37.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 37.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.43x | — | — | 67.05x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.01x | — | — | 10.16x | 11.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.70x | 4.90x | 4.89x | 48.27x | 17.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 81.09x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QTTB delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-50 for MDGL. TERN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs AKRO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | -20.0% | -30.6% | +98.3% | -50.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +53.3% | -19.4% | -29.1% | +11.8% | -25.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -24.7% | -55.3% | +33.4% | -29.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.8% | -16.2% | -42.4% | +15.3% | -32.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.00x | 0.05x | 1.62x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$33M | -$524M | -$304M | -$379M | $156M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $525M | $340M | $1.7B | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $919,000 | $36M | $1.3B | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 21.88x | — | -62.41x | 2.02x | -25.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TERN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $44,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $950 for QTTB. Over the past 12 months, TERN leads with a +1247.3% total return vs ALNY's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TERN at 63.8% vs QTTB's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +267.4% | +32.0% | — | -29.3% | -19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +643.5% | +1247.3% | +2.0% | -7.2% | +61.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +339.4% | -1.2% | +46.5% | +80.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | +247.2% | +83.9% | +69.7% | +346.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +187.9% | +198.3% | +366.4% | +3940.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | +63.8% | -0.4% | +13.6% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TERN and AKRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AKRO is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALNY's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TERN currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.34x | 0.32x | 0.60x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.85 | $53.18 | $57.35 | $495.55 | $615.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.35 | $3.55 | $41.77 | $281.76 | $275.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +99.6% | +95.3% | +57.1% | +78.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 73.7 | 70.4 | 44.0 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 827K | 5.5M | 0 | 1.0M | 263K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QTTB as "Hold", TERN as "Buy", AKRO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", MDGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.6% upside for ALNY (target: $446) vs -11.4% for AKRO (target: $48).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $55.50 | $48.40 | $445.67 | $710.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 16 | 14 | 52 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
QTTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TERN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
QTTB vs TERN vs AKRO vs ALNY vs MDGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 65. 2% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY). Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL?
On trailing P/E, Q32 Bio Inc.
(QTTB) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +346. 6%, compared to -90. 5% for Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +39. 4% versus QTTB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
(AKRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning ALNY is approximately 87% more volatile than AKRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus 65. 2% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -29. 8% for Akero Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTTB leads at 100. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL?
Q32 Bio Inc.
(QTTB) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 5% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QTTB leads at 31. 5% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTTB leads at 99. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALNY: 57.
6% to $445. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is QTTB or TERN or AKRO or ALNY or MDGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
(AKRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +198. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AKRO: +198. 3%, QTTB: -96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QTTB and TERN and AKRO and ALNY and MDGL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QTTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TERN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AKRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.