Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QXO vs HD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
QXO vs HD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $115M | $320.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.84B | $164.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-279M | $14.16B |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.6% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 51.5x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.48B | $19.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.36B | $1.39B |
QXO vs HD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| QXO, Inc. (QXO) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QXO vs HD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QXO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 119.3%, EPS growth -472.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 433.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.24, Low D/E 46.1%, current ratio 3.58x
- Beta 2.24, yield 91.1%, current ratio 3.58x
HD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 2.8%
- 184.0% 10Y total return vs QXO's -49.7%
- Lower P/E (21.5x vs 51.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 119.3% revenue growth vs HD's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.5x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs QXO's -4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs QXO's 2.24 | |
| Dividends | 91.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.6% vs HD's -8.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs QXO's -1.8%, ROIC 32.1% vs -3.1% |
QXO vs HD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QXO vs HD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 24.1x QXO's $6.8B. HD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QXO's -4.1%. On growth, QXO holds the edge at +147.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $164.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $60M | $24.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$279M | $14.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $183M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +147.8% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | -14.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QXO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QXO's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HD's 14.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $115M | $320.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $338.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.78x | 22.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 51.48x | 21.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.53x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 25.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.63x | 25.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HD delivers a 110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $110 in annual profit, vs $-3 for QXO. QXO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HD's 1.48x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | +110.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +29.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.79x | 8.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HD five years ago would be worth $10,732 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,086 for QXO. Over the past 12 months, QXO leads with a +40.6% total return vs HD's -8.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HD at 6.7% vs QXO's -37.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.6% | -8.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | +21.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | +7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.7% | +184.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.9% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HD is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QXO's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HD currently trades 75.6% from its 52-week high vs QXO's 67.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.24x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.61 | $426.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.30 | $310.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.9% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.1M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QXO and HD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QXO as "Buy" and HD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.0% upside for QXO (target: $30) vs 26.5% for HD (target: $408). For income investors, QXO offers the higher dividend yield at 91.13% vs HD's 2.84%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.20 | $408.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +91.1% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $17.10 | $9.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QXO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
QXO vs HD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QXO or HD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QXO, Inc.
(QXO) is the stronger pick with 119. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QXO, Inc. (QXO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QXO or HD?
On forward P/E, The Home Depot, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 21. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QXO or HD?
Over the past 5 years, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) delivered a total return of +7. 3%, compared to -89. 1% for QXO, Inc. (QXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HD returned +184. 0% versus QXO's -49. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QXO or HD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus QXO, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning QXO is approximately 168% more volatile than HD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, QXO, Inc. (QXO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 148% for The Home Depot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QXO or HD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QXO, Inc.
(QXO) is pulling ahead at 119. 3% versus 3. 2% for The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Home Depot, Inc. grew EPS -4. 6% year-over-year, compared to -472. 7% for QXO, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QXO leads at 433. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QXO or HD?
The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -4. 1% for QXO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus -3. 6% for QXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HD leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QXO or HD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for QXO, Inc. — 30. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QXO: 61. 0% to $30. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — QXO or HD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
QXO, Inc. (QXO) offers the highest yield at 91. 1%, versus 2. 8% for The Home Depot, Inc. (HD).
09Is QXO or HD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 8% yield, +184. 0% 10Y return). QXO, Inc. (QXO) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HD: +184. 0%, QXO: -49. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QXO and HD?
These companies operate in different sectors (QXO (Industrials) and HD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: QXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.