Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RAAQ vs IRM vs AMT vs PLD vs VICI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Diversified
RAAQ vs IRM vs AMT vs PLD vs VICI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $55K | $37.71B | $83.69B | $132.16B | $30.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $7.25B | $10.82B | $8.74B | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13.00 | $272M | $2.88B | $3.21B | $3.10B |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.0% | 73.4% | 67.7% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.0% | 44.2% | 47.0% | 98.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 56.3x | 27.4x | 41.4x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $19.05B | $44.96B | $31.49B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $159M | $1.47B | $1.32B | $563M |
RAAQ vs IRM vs AMT vs PLD vs VICI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real Asset Acquisit… (RAAQ) | 100 | 108.6 | +8.6% |
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.7% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
| VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) | 100 | 88.3 | -11.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAAQ vs IRM vs AMT vs PLD vs VICI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAAQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth -19.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 298.8% 10Y total return vs PLD's 259.1%
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2%
Among these 5 stocks, AMT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 53.7%, current ratio 0.92x
- +39.4% vs AMT's -15.0%
VICI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 6.1%
- PEG 1.21 vs PLD's 3.83
- Beta 0.22, yield 6.1%, current ratio 2.55x
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 41.4x), PEG 1.21 vs 3.83
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 41.4x), PEG 1.21 vs 3.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 76.7% margin vs IRM's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs IRM's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs AMT's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs RAAQ's -52.2% |
RAAQ vs IRM vs AMT vs PLD vs VICI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAAQ vs IRM vs AMT vs PLD vs VICI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICI leads in 3 of 6 categories
IRM leads 1 • RAAQ leads 0 • AMT leads 0 • PLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT and RAAQ operate at a comparable scale, with $10.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. VICI is the more profitable business, keeping 76.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRM's 3.8%. On growth, IRM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $7.2B | $10.8B | $8.7B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $2.3B | $6.9B | $6.7B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $272M | $2.9B | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$625M | $3.8B | $5.2B | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +55.0% | +73.4% | +67.7% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +18.0% | +44.2% | +47.0% | +98.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +3.8% | +26.6% | +36.7% | +76.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.6% | +34.9% | +59.3% | +63.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +21.6% | +6.8% | +8.7% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.9% | +76.9% | -24.1% | +60.8% |
Valuation Metrics
VICI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, VICI trades at a 96% valuation discount to IRM's 258.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICI offers better value at 1.33x vs AMT's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55,100 | $37.7B | $83.7B | $132.2B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55,100 | $56.6B | $127.2B | $162.3B | $30.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4238.46x | 258.73x | 33.33x | 35.49x | 11.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.26x | 27.41x | 41.39x | 10.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.57x | 3.28x | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 23.30x | 18.32x | 23.20x | 8.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.46x | 7.86x | 16.11x | 7.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2303.99x | — | 8.14x | 2.32x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.12x | 26.90x | 12.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VICI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-55 for RAAQ. PLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs RAAQ's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -54.5% | — | +27.4% | +5.6% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.2% | +1.3% | +4.5% | +3.3% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.2% | +6.9% | +3.8% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +8.2% | +8.6% | +4.8% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 4.34x | 0.54x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $18.9B | $43.5B | $30.2B | -$563M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $159M | $1.5B | $1.3B | $563M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $19.1B | $45.0B | $31.5B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.28x | 3.99x | 5.27x | 4.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $34,010 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,525 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +39.4% total return vs AMT's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRM at 34.3% vs VICI's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +53.3% | +3.8% | +11.1% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.5% | +33.7% | -15.0% | +39.4% | -3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | +142.0% | +3.3% | +20.8% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | +240.1% | -14.7% | +37.7% | +17.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | +298.8% | +113.8% | +259.1% | +118.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.8% | +34.3% | +1.1% | +6.5% | +1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMT and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRM's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.01x | 1.10x | -0.04x | 0.73x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.77 | $134.09 | $234.33 | $145.44 | $34.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.20 | $77.77 | $165.08 | $103.02 | $26.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +94.5% | +76.7% | +97.8% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.5 | 78.2 | 52.4 | 58.4 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 165K | 1.5M | 2.8M | 3.1M | 7.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMT and PLD and VICI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRM as "Buy", AMT as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", VICI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 1.5% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, VICI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.06% vs IRM's 2.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $132.33 | $216.33 | $144.43 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 49 | 42 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | +3.7% | +2.6% | +6.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 11 | 11 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.09 | $6.73 | $3.74 | $1.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
VICI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RAAQ vs IRM vs AMT vs PLD vs VICI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI?
On trailing P/E, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 258. 7x. On forward P/E, VICI Properties Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: VICI Properties Inc. wins at 1. 21x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +240.
1%, compared to -14. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +298. 8% versus RAAQ's +5. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Iron Mountain Incorporated's 1. 10β — meaning IRM is approximately -3041% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prologis, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Iron Mountain Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI?
VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Real Asset Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 69. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICI leads at 91. 1% versus 0. 0% for RAAQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICI leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 21x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 56. 3x for Iron Mountain Incorporated — 46. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 20. 4% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI?
In this comparison, VICI (6.
1% yield), AMT (3. 7% yield), PLD (2. 6% yield), IRM (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RAAQ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAAQ or IRM or AMT or PLD or VICI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +113. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 8%, IRM: +298. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAAQ and IRM and AMT and PLD and VICI?
These companies operate in different sectors (RAAQ (Financial Services) and IRM (Real Estate) and AMT (Real Estate) and PLD (Real Estate) and VICI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RAAQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VICI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. IRM, AMT, PLD, VICI pay a dividend while RAAQ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.