Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RADX vs AGEN vs IMVT vs BMY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
RADX vs AGEN vs IMVT vs BMY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $33M | $132M | $5.53B | $114.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $114M | $0.00 | $48.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $115K | $-464M | $7.28B |
| Gross Margin | 1.1% | 35.7% | — | 68.7% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | -17.7% | — | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.9x | — | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $10M | $98K | $47.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $3M | $714M | $10.21B |
RADX vs AGEN vs IMVT vs BMY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiopharm Theranos… (RADX) | 100 | 89.1 | -10.9% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 116.8 | +16.8% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 99.3 | -0.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RADX vs AGEN vs IMVT vs BMY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RADX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 85.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.4%
- 11.1% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
AGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (2.9x vs 8.9x)
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs BMY's 6.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- +96.1% vs RADX's -4.4%
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 4.4%
- Beta 0.50, yield 4.4%, current ratio 1.26x
- 15.0% margin vs RADX's -10.6%
- Beta 0.50 vs AGEN's 2.72
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 8.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs RADX's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +96.1% vs RADX's -4.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs RADX's -48.4%, ROIC 16.9% vs -254.1% |
RADX vs AGEN vs IMVT vs BMY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RADX vs AGEN vs IMVT vs BMY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMY leads in 3 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • IMVT leads 1 • RADX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $48.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RADX's -10.6%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $114M | $0 | $48.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$10M | -$487M | $15.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $115,000 | -$464M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$159M | -$423M | $11.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +35.7% | — | +68.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | -17.7% | — | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +0.1% | — | +15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | -139.1% | — | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.5% | — | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +85.3% | +19.7% | +9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $132M | $5.5B | $114.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $140M | $4.8B | $151.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | -1102.94x | -9.97x | 16.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.94x | — | 8.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 9.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.42x | 1.16x | — | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | — | 5.83x | 6.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-109 for RADX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | — | -47.1% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.4% | +0.1% | -44.1% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | — | — | +16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.6% | — | -66.1% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.00x | 2.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $7M | -$714M | $36.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $3M | $714M | $10.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $10M | $98,000 | $47.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -584.59x | 1.11x | — | 10.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $611 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +96.1% total return vs RADX's -4.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 12.1% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.6% | +16.1% | +5.1% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.4% | +27.1% | +96.1% | +23.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -88.2% | +40.9% | -7.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -93.9% | +62.4% | +5.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -94.3% | +173.6% | +6.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | -51.0% | +12.1% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and BMY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs RADX's 25.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 2.58x | 1.36x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.25 | $7.34 | $30.09 | $62.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $2.71 | $13.36 | $42.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.5% | +51.1% | +90.5% | +89.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 48.8 | 60.2 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 184K | 814K | 1.4M | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BMY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGEN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", BMY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 10.2% for BMY (target: $62). BMY is the only dividend payer here at 4.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.33 | $45.50 | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 23 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BMY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RADX vs AGEN vs IMVT vs BMY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Radiopharm Theranostics Limited (RADX) is the stronger pick with 1114% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0.
2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agenus Inc. (AGEN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY?
On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.
is actually cheaper at 2. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -93. 9% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus AGEN's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
45β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 469% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Radiopharm Theranostics Limited (RADX) is pulling ahead at 1114% versus -0.
2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RADX leads at 643. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus -1055. 3% for Radiopharm Theranostics Limited — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMY leads at 26. 3% versus -1050. 6% for RADX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 9x for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95. 5% to $7. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY?
In this comparison, BMY (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. RADX, AGEN, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RADX or AGEN or IMVT or BMY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
45), 4. 4% yield). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMY: +6. 6%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RADX and AGEN and IMVT and BMY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RADX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BMY pays a dividend while RADX, AGEN, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.