Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIN vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW vs ARTNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
RAIN vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW vs ARTNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $3M | $529M | $955M | $421M | $326M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $132M | $199M | $-18M | $113M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $18M | $44M | $21M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.6% | 33.3% | 54.8% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 139015.1% | 28.1% | 35.8% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.6x | 20.1x | 18.0x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $708.60B | $419M | $232M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33K | $123.79T | $3M | $1K | $52K |
RAIN vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW vs ARTNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rain Enhancement Te… (RAIN) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 122.4 | +22.4% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
| The York Water Comp… (YORW) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| Artesian Resources … (ARTNA) | 100 | 101.0 | +1.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIN vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW vs ARTNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, RAIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CWCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 155.1% 10Y total return vs MSEX's 62.9%
- 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ARTNA's 3.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +47.9% vs RAIN's -75.1%
MSEX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 3.2% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9%
YORW is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 25.9% margin vs RAIN's -2.4%
ARTNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 11.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 73.1%, current ratio 0.64x
- PEG 3.68 vs MSEX's 12.58
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 18.0x), PEG 3.68 vs 9.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs RAIN's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs RAIN's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ARTNA's 3.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.9% vs RAIN's -75.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9% |
RAIN vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW vs ARTNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAIN vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW vs ARTNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
YORW leads 1 • ARTNA leads 1 • RAIN leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YORW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSEX and YORW operate at a comparable scale, with $199M and -$18M in trailing revenue. YORW is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWCO's 13.9%. On growth, MSEX holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $132M | $199M | -$18M | $113M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $25.98T | $81M | $42M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $18M | $44M | $21M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $33.67T | -$19M | -$30M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +36.6% | +33.3% | +54.8% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +139015.1% | +28.1% | +35.8% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +22.1% | +25.9% | +20.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +254916.5% | -9.7% | -24.3% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +10.0% | -100.0% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -11.5% | -100.0% | +32.0% | +8.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARTNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, ARTNA trades at a 34% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARTNA offers better value at 3.33x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $529M | $955M | $421M | $326M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | -$123.08T | $1.4B | $653M | $509M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | — | 21.78x | 20.99x | 14.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.60x | 20.12x | 18.01x | 15.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.62x | 11.52x | 3.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -4.74x | 15.79x | 15.56x | 10.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.01x | 4.91x | 5.43x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.00x | 1.89x | 1.75x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.00x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARTNA delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWCO. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YORW's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWCO scores 5/9 vs YORW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | 0.0% | +9.1% | +8.9% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +3.2% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +26.6% | +4.7% | +4.6% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +16.0% | +4.4% | +4.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.85x | 0.97x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$123.08T | $416M | $232M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32,604 | $123.79T | $3M | $1,000 | $52,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $708.6B | $419M | $232M | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.90x | — | 4.33x | 1.92x | 4.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,000 for RAIN. Over the past 12 months, CWCO leads with a +47.9% total return vs RAIN's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWCO at 26.3% vs RAIN's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.8% | -3.9% | +3.0% | -7.3% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | +47.9% | -12.8% | -9.4% | -3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +101.4% | -25.2% | -25.9% | -35.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +197.4% | -28.4% | -32.0% | -7.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +155.1% | +62.9% | +25.0% | +48.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | +26.3% | -9.2% | -9.5% | -13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSEX and ARTNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAIN's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARTNA currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs RAIN's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.76x | -0.12x | 0.08x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.58 | $39.12 | $62.18 | $35.10 | $35.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $22.69 | $44.17 | $28.26 | $30.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +84.8% | +82.7% | +83.1% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 47.9 | 44.1 | 34.8 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 163K | 160K | 174K | 69K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and YORW and ARTNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWCO as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy", YORW as "Hold", ARTNA as "Buy". For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $53.50 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +2.7% | +3.0% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 21 | 31 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $497756.41 | $1.37 | $0.88 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). YORW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
RAIN vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW vs ARTNA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the stronger pick with 4.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA?
On trailing P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Artesian Resources Corporation wins at 3. 68x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -80. 0% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWCO returned +155. 1% versus RAIN's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc's 1. 20β — meaning RAIN is approximately -1067% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 97% for The York Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is pulling ahead at 4.
6% versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artesian Resources Corporation grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA?
The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 0. 0% for RAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 68x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield), ARTNA (3. 9% yield), YORW (3. 0% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. RAIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAIN or CWCO or MSEX or YORW or ARTNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, RAIN: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAIN and CWCO and MSEX and YORW and ARTNA?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YORW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ARTNA is a small-cap deep-value stock. CWCO, MSEX, YORW, ARTNA pay a dividend while RAIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.