Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RANI vs NUVL vs PRAX vs LNTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
RANI vs NUVL vs PRAX vs LNTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $23M | $7.74B | $9.53B | $6.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $-450M | $-327M | $279M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | — | — | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | -37.3% | — | — | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 17.7x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $0.00 | $110K | $738K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $262M | $357M | $359M |
RANI vs NUVL vs PRAX vs LNTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rani Therapeutics H… (RANI) | 100 | 8.8 | -91.2% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 576.9 | +476.9% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 141.0 | +41.0% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 355.6 | +255.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RANI vs NUVL vs PRAX vs LNTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RANI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.01, current ratio 15.27x
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +7.7% vs LNTH's +15.7%
LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.45
- Rev growth 0.5%, EPS growth -21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.1%
- 42.9% 10Y total return vs NUVL's 461.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs RANI's -23.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs RANI's 2.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs LNTH's +15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs RANI's -279.3%, ROIC 30.6% vs -101.1% |
RANI vs NUVL vs PRAX vs LNTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RANI vs NUVL vs PRAX vs LNTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • RANI leads 0 • NUVL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RANI's -23.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 | $0 | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | -$346M | -$357M | $347M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | -$450M | -$327M | $279M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | -$313M | -$283M | $372M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | — | — | +60.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.3% | — | — | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.6% | — | — | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.2% | — | — | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -17.8% | +2.7% | +76.5% |
Valuation Metrics
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $7.7B | $9.5B | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $7.5B | $9.2B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.92x | -18.00x | -24.48x | 27.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 17.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.51x | — | — | 3.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.87x | 6.13x | 8.46x | 5.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 17.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-2 for RANI. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RANI's 8.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNTH scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -42.8% | -43.0% | +24.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | -37.8% | -40.2% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -101.1% | -32.5% | -65.0% | +30.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -159.9% | -34.4% | -49.3% | +17.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.51x | — | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $26M | -$262M | -$357M | -$358M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $262M | $357M | $359M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $0 | $110,000 | $738,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.97x | -26.85x | — | 15.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $56,149 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $878 for RANI. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs LNTH's +15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs RANI's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.0% | +4.4% | +15.2% | +38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.4% | +47.0% | +767.1% | +15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.4% | +178.8% | +1956.2% | -1.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +461.5% | -14.9% | +338.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +461.5% | -20.9% | +4289.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.1% | +40.7% | +174.0% | -0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RANI's 2.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs RANI's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.38x | 1.01x | 1.40x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.87 | $113.02 | $356.00 | $94.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $63.56 | $35.21 | $47.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +93.2% | +92.7% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 48.9 | 53.3 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 546K | 376K | 872K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RANI as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1523.0% upside for RANI (target: $16) vs 6.7% for LNTH (target: $99).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.67 | $144.40 | $548.80 | $99.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 | 16 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.0% |
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns).
RANI vs NUVL vs PRAX vs LNTH: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the stronger pick with 0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 27. 3x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (RANI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +461. 5%, compared to -91. 2% for Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (RANI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +42. 9% versus RANI's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 38β — meaning RANI is approximately 423% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is pulling ahead at 0. 5% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 21. 1% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNTH leads at 18. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -29. 2% for Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -51. 9% for RANI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RANI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RANI: 1523.
0% to $15. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RANI or NUVL or PRAX or LNTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (RANI) carries a higher beta of 2. 38 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +42. 9%, RANI: -91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RANI and NUVL and PRAX and LNTH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.