Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RARE vs DBVT vs BMRN vs ALKS vs ACAD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1712.35T
5Y Perf.-58.8%
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.41B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
ALKS
Alkermes plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$5.90B
5Y Perf.+116.4%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-54.6%

RARE vs DBVT vs BMRN vs ALKS vs ACAD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RARE logoRARE
DBVT logoDBVT
BMRN logoBMRN
ALKS logoALKS
ACAD logoACAD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$2.57B$1712.35T$10.41B$5.90B$3.86B
Revenue (TTM)$669M$0.00$3.24B$1.56B$1.10B
Net Income (TTM)$-609M$-168M$269M$153M$376M
Gross Margin83.6%75.9%65.4%91.5%
Operating Margin-83.9%13.8%12.3%7.4%
Forward P/E12.6x24.8x50.9x
Total Debt$1.28B$22M$643M$70M$52M
Cash & Equiv.$434M$194M$1.31B$1.12B$178M

RARE vs DBVT vs BMRN vs ALKS vs ACADLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RARE
DBVT
BMRN
ALKS
ACAD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)10041.2-58.8%
BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN)10050.8-49.2%
Alkermes plc (ALKS)100216.4+116.4%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10045.4-54.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RARE vs DBVT vs BMRN vs ALKS vs ACAD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BMRN and ACAD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. RARE and DBVT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Play

RARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
  • 20.1% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Income Pick

DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
  • +110.4% vs RARE's -21.8%
Best for: income & stability
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BMRN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 5.21x
  • Beta 0.65, current ratio 5.21x
  • Lower P/E (12.6x vs 50.9x)
  • Beta 0.65 vs RARE's 1.42
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ALKS
Alkermes plc
The Long-Run Compounder

ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -11.0% 10Y total return vs ACAD's -22.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Quality Compounder

ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
  • 26.2% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRARE logoRARE20.1% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValueBMRN logoBMRNLower P/E (12.6x vs 50.9x)
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyBMRN logoBMRNBeta 0.65 vs RARE's 1.42
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DBVT logoDBVT+110.4% vs RARE's -21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%

RARE vs DBVT vs BMRN vs ALKS vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

BMRNBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.3%$3.2B
Royalty And Other
1.7%$53M
ALKSAlkermes plc
FY 2025
Vivitrol
39.8%$468M
Aristada And Aristada Initio
31.5%$370M
Manufactured Product And Royalty
24.8%$291M
Manufacturing Revenue
3.9%$46M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M

RARE vs DBVT vs BMRN vs ALKS vs ACAD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRARELAGGINGACAD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ALKS and ACAD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BMRN and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$669M$0$3.2B$1.6B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$536M-$112M$521M$212M$96M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$609M-$168M$269M$153M$376M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$487M-$151M$767M$392M$212M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+83.6%+75.9%+65.4%+91.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-83.9%+13.8%+12.3%+7.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-91.0%+8.3%+9.8%+34.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-72.8%+23.7%+25.1%+19.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.4%+2.8%+28.2%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-17.2%+91.5%-43.2%-4.1%-81.8%
Evenly matched — ALKS and ACAD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 67% valuation discount to BMRN's 30.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMRN's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.

MetricRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Market CapShares × price$2.6B$1712.35T$10.4B$5.9B$3.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.4B$1712.35T$9.7B$4.9B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.48x-0.76x30.07x24.76x9.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.60x50.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.89x17.25x26.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.82x3.23x4.00x3.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.66x1.75x3.28x3.15x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.36x12.28x36.74x
BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALKS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.1%-130.2%+4.4%+8.8%+35.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-45.8%-89.0%+3.4%+5.4%+26.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-89.4%+7.4%+18.9%+10.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-46.4%-145.7%+8.1%+14.2%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.11x0.04x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$842M-$172M-$669M-$1.0B-$126M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$434M$194M$1.3B$1.1B$178M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.3B$22M$643M$70M$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.49x-189.82x16.96x32.30x
ALKS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — DBVT and ALKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.7%+4.9%-9.0%+25.3%-13.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-21.8%+110.4%-8.8%+16.5%+52.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.5%+19.7%-43.6%+14.5%+4.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.2%-69.1%-30.4%+60.9%+7.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.4%-87.0%-35.6%-11.0%-22.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-17.8%+6.2%-17.4%+4.6%+1.5%
Evenly matched — DBVT and ALKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BMRN and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BMRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.42x1.26x0.65x1.06x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$42.37$26.18$66.28$36.60$27.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.29$7.53$50.76$25.17$14.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.7%+76.3%+81.7%+96.7%+81.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.648.148.760.244.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M252K1.8M2.3M1.8M
Evenly matched — BMRN and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: RARE as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44).

MetricRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$51.50$46.33$89.64$44.00$34.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts3315412837
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.5%0.0%
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BMRN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ALKS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallUltragenyx Pharmaceutical I… (RARE)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RARE vs DBVT vs BMRN vs ALKS vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD?

On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD?

Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.

9%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -11. 0% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 118% more volatile than BMRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 38. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is RARE or DBVT or BMRN or ALKS or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMRN: -35. 6%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RARE and DBVT and BMRN and ALKS and ACAD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BMRN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.