Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RAVE vs DENN vs TXRH vs RRGB vs NATH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
RAVE vs DENN vs TXRH vs RRGB vs NATH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $41M | $322M | $10.41B | $81M | $952M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $457M | $6.06B | $1.21B | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $10M | $415M | $-23M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 53.4% | 43.8% | 18.7% | 26.8% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.3% | 8.4% | 8.2% | 0.2% | 20.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 15.0x | 25.0x | — | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $576K | $408M | $1.89B | $514M | $56M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $2M | $135M | $20M | $28M |
RAVE vs DENN vs TXRH vs RRGB vs NATH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAVE Restaurant Gro… (RAVE) | 100 | 323.3 | +223.3% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
| Red Robin Gourmet B… (RRGB) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Nathan's Famous, In… (NATH) | 100 | 181.1 | +81.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAVE vs DENN vs TXRH vs RRGB vs NATH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAVE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 6.61x
- 23.2% margin vs RRGB's -1.9%
DENN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 17.3x)
- +39.8% vs TXRH's -6.2%
TXRH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs NATH's 163.6%
- PEG 1.17 vs NATH's 1.33
- 9.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1%
- 1.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NATH's 2.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, RRGB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NATH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 22.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- Beta 0.52, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.52 vs RRGB's 2.10
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 17.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs RRGB's -1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs RRGB's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NATH's 2.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs TXRH's -6.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 227.7% vs 0.5% |
RAVE vs DENN vs TXRH vs RRGB vs NATH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RAVE vs DENN vs TXRH vs RRGB vs NATH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories
DENN leads 0 • TXRH leads 0 • RRGB leads 0 • NATH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 480.0x RAVE's $13M. RAVE is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RRGB's -1.9%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $457M | $6.1B | $1.2B | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $55M | $709M | $54M | $33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $10M | $415M | -$23M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $2M | $441M | $6M | $22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.4% | +43.8% | +18.7% | +26.8% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +8.4% | +8.2% | +0.2% | +20.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +2.2% | +6.8% | -1.9% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +0.5% | +7.3% | +0.5% | +14.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +1.3% | +12.8% | -5.7% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.7% | -89.9% | +10.0% | +77.4% | -31.8% |
Valuation Metrics
RAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 41% valuation discount to TXRH's 25.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.38x vs NATH's 1.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $322M | $10.4B | $81M | $952M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $728M | $12.2B | $575M | $980M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.32x | 15.24x | 25.89x | -2.80x | 17.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.02x | 25.05x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.28x | 12.10x | 17.15x | 10.66x | 26.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.44x | 0.71x | 1.77x | 0.07x | 6.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.99x | — | 7.09x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.39x | 350.62x | 30.44x | 13.00x | 38.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RAVE and NATH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $19 for RAVE. RAVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXRH's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RAVE scores 8/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | — | +37.4% | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.8% | +2.0% | +12.2% | -4.1% | +42.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | +9.7% | +14.5% | +0.5% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.8% | +11.9% | +20.1% | +0.7% | +104.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | 1.27x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $406M | $1.8B | $494M | $28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $2M | $135M | $20M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $576,000 | $408M | $1.9B | $514M | $56M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.23x | 1.73x | — | 0.26x | 11.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAVE five years ago would be worth $22,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,032 for RRGB. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs TXRH's -6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAVE at 24.7% vs RRGB's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +0.6% | -7.4% | -11.4% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.9% | +39.8% | -6.2% | +34.9% | +7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.0% | -41.3% | +53.6% | -70.5% | +50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.5% | -64.9% | +61.6% | -89.7% | +72.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.0% | -42.9% | +288.0% | -94.4% | +163.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | -16.3% | +15.4% | -33.4% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DENN and NATH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRGB's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs RRGB's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.65x | 0.70x | 2.10x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.75 | $6.26 | $199.99 | $7.89 | $118.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $3.36 | $153.82 | $2.46 | $88.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.6% | +99.8% | +79.0% | +46.5% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 66.9 | 45.7 | 51.6 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 0 | 983K | 384K | 24K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TXRH and NATH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DENN as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold", RRGB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 90.7% upside for RRGB (target: $7) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). For income investors, NATH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $191.64 | $7.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 43 | 38 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 5 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.71 | — | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +3.6% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
RAVE vs DENN vs TXRH vs RRGB vs NATH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 25. 9x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH?
Over the past 5 years, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to -89. 7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus RRGB's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning RRGB is approximately 304% more volatile than NATH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 127% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. grew EPS 73. 4% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH?
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -1. 9% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAVE leads at 27. 1% versus 0. 2% for RRGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRGB: 90. 7% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH?
In this comparison, NATH (2.
0% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. RAVE, DENN, RRGB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAVE or DENN or TXRH or RRGB or NATH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 0% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NATH: +163. 6%, RRGB: -94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAVE and DENN and TXRH and RRGB and NATH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RAVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RRGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NATH is a small-cap deep-value stock. TXRH, NATH pay a dividend while RAVE, DENN, RRGB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.