Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RCUS vs FOLD vs PTCT vs CRL vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
RCUS vs FOLD vs PTCT vs CRL vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $2.55B | $4.55B | $6.11B | $8.76B | $30.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $236M | $634M | $827M | $4.03B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-369M | $-27M | $-187M | $-185M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | 87.9% | 49.7% | 31.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -168.6% | 5.2% | -8.3% | 11.8% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.6x | 9.5x | 16.0x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $99M | $483M | $492M | $3.07B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $214M | $985M | $214M | $1.98B |
RCUS vs FOLD vs PTCT vs CRL vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCUS vs FOLD vs PTCT vs CRL vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +197.3% vs IQV's +16.6%
FOLD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.61 vs RCUS's 1.84
PTCT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 14.0x)
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IQV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32
- 8.3% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
- 4.7% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs -64.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 14.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs RCUS's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +197.3% vs IQV's +16.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs -64.1% |
RCUS vs FOLD vs PTCT vs CRL vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RCUS vs FOLD vs PTCT vs CRL vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 1 • FOLD leads 1 • RCUS leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 70.5x RCUS's $236M. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $236M | $634M | $827M | $4.0B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$391M | $40M | -$37M | $824M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$369M | -$27M | -$187M | -$185M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$489M | $30M | -$169M | $391M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | +87.9% | +49.7% | +31.9% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -168.6% | +5.2% | -8.3% | +11.8% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -156.4% | -4.3% | -22.6% | -4.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +4.7% | -20.4% | +9.7% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.3% | +23.7% | -76.8% | +1.2% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | -89.0% | -100.3% | -160.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and IQV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 58% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $4.5B | $6.1B | $8.8B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $4.8B | $5.6B | $11.6B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.71x | -164.85x | 9.47x | -61.04x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.62x | — | 16.00x | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 114.88x | 6.27x | 12.75x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.34x | 7.17x | 3.53x | 2.18x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.32x | 16.29x | — | 2.74x | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 152.43x | 8.70x | 16.90x | 14.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PTCT and IQV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -69.0% | -12.0% | — | -5.7% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.3% | -3.2% | -6.8% | -2.5% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.1% | +5.3% | — | +6.3% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.1% | +5.1% | +55.9% | +8.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.76x | — | 0.95x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123M | $269M | -$492M | $2.9B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $214M | $985M | $214M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $99M | $483M | $492M | $3.1B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.38x | 1.00x | -1.67x | 4.29x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $18,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,336 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +197.3% total return vs IQV's +16.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTCT at 9.9% vs CRL's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.9% | +1.5% | -4.0% | -12.3% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +197.3% | +138.3% | +73.3% | +25.7% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | +19.0% | +32.7% | -6.5% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.1% | +54.3% | +89.4% | -46.6% | -22.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +119.2% | +852.1% | +114.0% | +166.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | +6.0% | +9.9% | -2.2% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.61x | 1.03x | 1.44x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.72 | $14.50 | $87.50 | $228.88 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.72 | $5.51 | $39.53 | $132.58 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +99.9% | +84.2% | +77.6% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 72.2 | 40.0 | 57.4 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.9M | 1.1M | 792K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RCUS as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.0% upside for PTCT (target: $98) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $14.50 | $98.00 | $206.43 | $223.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 24 | 26 | 36 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PTCT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RCUS vs FOLD vs PTCT vs CRL vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -46. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus RCUS's +49. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning RCUS is approximately 200% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 26. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PTCT: 33. 0% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RCUS or FOLD or PTCT or CRL or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, RCUS: +49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCUS and FOLD and PTCT and CRL and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.