Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RDHL vs CMPX vs AGEN vs REGN vs CRL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RDHL
RedHill Biopharma Ltd.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
CMPX
Compass Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$253M
5Y Perf.-73.9%
AGEN
Agenus Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$135M
5Y Perf.-93.8%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$74.28B
5Y Perf.+48.5%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.76B
5Y Perf.-46.6%

RDHL vs CMPX vs AGEN vs REGN vs CRL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RDHL logoRDHL
CMPX logoCMPX
AGEN logoAGEN
REGN logoREGN
CRL logoCRL
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$5M$253M$135M$74.28B$8.76B
Revenue (TTM)$10M$0.00$114M$14.92B$4.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$-68M$115K$4.42B$-185M
Gross Margin64.5%35.7%84.5%31.9%
Operating Margin-110.4%-17.7%24.3%11.8%
Forward P/E2.9x15.5x16.0x
Total Debt$356K$10M$10M$2.71B$3.07B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$31M$3M$3.12B$214M

RDHL vs CMPX vs AGEN vs REGN vs CRLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RDHL
CMPX
AGEN
REGN
CRL
StockApr 21May 26Return
RedHill Biopharma L… (RDHL)1000.0-100.0%
Compass Therapeutic… (CMPX)10026.1-73.9%
Agenus Inc. (AGEN)1006.2-93.8%
Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN)100148.5+48.5%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10053.4-46.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RDHL vs CMPX vs AGEN vs REGN vs CRL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: REGN leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. RedHill Biopharma Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. AGEN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RDHL
RedHill Biopharma Ltd.
The Growth Leader

RDHL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 23.2% revenue growth vs CMPX's -100.0%
Best for: growth
CMPX
Compass Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CMPX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 5.0%, current ratio 15.02x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
AGEN
Agenus Inc.
The Growth Play

AGEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
  • Lower P/E (2.9x vs 15.5x)
Best for: growth exposure
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 0.5%
  • Beta 0.77, yield 0.5%, current ratio 4.13x
  • 29.6% margin vs RDHL's -97.5%
  • Beta 0.77 vs AGEN's 2.58
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 114.0% 10Y total return vs REGN's 91.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRDHL logoRDHL23.2% revenue growth vs CMPX's -100.0%
ValueAGEN logoAGENLower P/E (2.9x vs 15.5x)
Quality / MarginsREGN logoREGN29.6% margin vs RDHL's -97.5%
Stability / SafetyREGN logoREGNBeta 0.77 vs AGEN's 2.58
DividendsREGN logoREGN0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)REGN logoREGN+31.2% vs RDHL's -49.0%
Efficiency (ROA)REGN logoREGN11.1% ROA vs RDHL's -51.1%

RDHL vs CMPX vs AGEN vs REGN vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RDHLRedHill Biopharma Ltd.
FY 2024
Movantik
100.0%$900,000
CMPXCompass Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AGENAgenus Inc.
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue
99.1%$109M
Other
0.9%$1M
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
51.1%$7.3B
Product
44.0%$6.3B
Product and Service, Other
4.9%$703M
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M

RDHL vs CMPX vs AGEN vs REGN vs CRL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLREGNLAGGINGCRL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

REGN and CMPX operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RDHL's -97.5%. On growth, RDHL holds the edge at +58.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRDHL logoRDHLRedHill Biopharma…CMPX logoCMPXCompass Therapeut…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$0$114M$14.9B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M-$74M-$10M$4.2B$824M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M-$68M$115,000$4.4B-$185M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M-$53M-$159M$4.2B$391M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.5%+35.7%+84.5%+31.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-110.4%-17.7%+24.3%+11.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-97.5%+0.1%+29.6%-4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-86.0%-139.1%+27.9%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.6%+27.5%+19.0%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year0.0%+16.7%+85.3%-7.2%-160.0%
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AGEN and CRL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.9x.

MetricRDHL logoRDHLRedHill Biopharma…CMPX logoCMPXCompass Therapeut…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Market CapShares × price$5M$253M$135M$74.3B$8.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$903,014$232M$142M$73.9B$11.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.14x-4.36x-1123.53x17.23x-61.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.94x15.46x16.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.72x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.92x12.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.64x1.18x5.18x2.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.47x2.48x2.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.20x16.90x
Evenly matched — AGEN and CRL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

REGN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-40 for CMPX. CMPX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs CMPX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricRDHL logoRDHLRedHill Biopharma…CMPX logoCMPXCompass Therapeut…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-39.7%+14.3%-5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-51.1%-35.3%+0.1%+11.1%-2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-41.3%+8.9%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-43.2%+10.2%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933654
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.09x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M-$21M$7M-$412M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$31M$3M$3.1B$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$356,000$10M$10M$2.7B$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.99x1.11x108.44x4.29x
REGN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in REGN five years ago would be worth $14,320 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for RDHL. Over the past 12 months, REGN leads with a +31.2% total return vs RDHL's -49.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REGN at -1.5% vs RDHL's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRDHL logoRDHLRedHill Biopharma…CMPX logoCMPXCompass Therapeut…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.9%-64.6%+18.3%-7.8%-12.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-49.0%+2.8%+25.7%+31.2%+25.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.3%-47.4%-88.0%-4.4%-6.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-59.3%-93.7%+43.2%-46.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-78.5%-94.2%+91.6%+114.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-74.3%-19.3%-50.7%-1.5%-2.2%
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

REGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

REGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs CMPX's 26.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRDHL logoRDHLRedHill Biopharma…CMPX logoCMPXCompass Therapeut…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.30x1.22x2.58x0.77x1.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.31$6.88$7.34$821.11$228.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.71$1.61$2.71$476.49$132.58
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.5%+26.6%+52.0%+87.1%+77.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.123.646.141.757.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded39K7.7M822K626K792K
REGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CMPX as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 512.0% upside for CMPX (target: $11) vs 16.2% for CRL (target: $206). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricRDHL logoRDHLRedHill Biopharma…CMPX logoCMPXCompass Therapeut…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.20$7.33$865.68$206.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts15114836
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%+5.3%+4.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

REGN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, … (REGN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RDHL vs CMPX vs AGEN vs REGN vs CRL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, RedHill Biopharma Ltd.

(RDHL) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (CMPX). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (CMPX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL?

On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.

is actually cheaper at 2. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL?

Over the past 5 years, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) delivered a total return of +43. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRL returned +114. 0% versus RDHL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 237% more volatile than REGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (CMPX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RedHill Biopharma Ltd.

(RDHL) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus -100. 0% for Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (CMPX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL?

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -102. 8% for RedHill Biopharma Ltd. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -181. 7% for RDHL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.

(AGEN) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMPX: 512. 0% to $11. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL?

In this comparison, REGN (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. RDHL, CMPX, AGEN, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RDHL or CMPX or AGEN or REGN or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +91. 6%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RDHL and CMPX and AGEN and REGN and CRL?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RDHL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RDHL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMPX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AGEN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REGN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RDHL and CMPX and AGEN and REGN and CRL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RDHL: 58.6% · CMPX: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.