Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RDW vs KTOS vs BWXT vs BA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
RDW vs KTOS vs BWXT vs BA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $10.68B | $19.22B | $182.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $371M | $1.42B | $3.38B | $92.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-300M | $29M | $345M | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | 9.2% | 18.3% | 16.8% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | -76.8% | 1.8% | 11.0% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 73.5x | 45.5x | 4979.1x |
| Total Debt | $231M | $180M | $2.02B | $54.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $561M | $503M | $10.92B |
RDW vs KTOS vs BWXT vs BA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwire Corporation (RDW) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 214.8 | +114.8% |
| BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT) | 100 | 389.1 | +289.1% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 119.0 | +19.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RDW vs KTOS vs BWXT vs BA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RDW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs BWXT's 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.06x
BWXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.5%
- Beta 1.60, yield 0.5%, current ratio 2.32x
- Lower P/E (45.5x vs 4979.1x)
- 10.2% margin vs RDW's -80.9%
BA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
- 34.5% revenue growth vs RDW's 10.3%
- Beta 0.97 vs RDW's 3.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs RDW's 10.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (45.5x vs 4979.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs RDW's -80.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs RDW's 3.20 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs BA's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +95.6% vs RDW's -17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs RDW's -20.3%, ROIC 10.1% vs -27.8% |
RDW vs KTOS vs BWXT vs BA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RDW vs KTOS vs BWXT vs BA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BWXT leads in 3 of 6 categories
BA leads 1 • RDW leads 0 • KTOS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWXT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 248.5x RDW's $371M. BWXT is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RDW's -80.9%. On growth, RDW holds the edge at +57.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $371M | $1.4B | $3.4B | $92.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$244M | $72M | $458M | -$3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$300M | $29M | $345M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | -$133M | $328M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +18.3% | +16.8% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -76.8% | +1.8% | +11.0% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -80.9% | +2.1% | +10.2% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | -9.4% | +9.7% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.9% | +22.6% | +26.1% | +14.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +133.3% | +20.7% | +31.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RDW and BWXT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 58.4x trailing earnings, BWXT trades at a 87% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BWXT's 47.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KTOS's 118.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $10.7B | $19.2B | $182.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $10.3B | $20.7B | $225.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.04x | 438.46x | 58.43x | 93.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.49x | 45.51x | 4979.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 118.42x | 47.94x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.53x | 7.93x | 6.01x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 4.94x | 15.62x | 32.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 65.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-29 for RDW. KTOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BA scores 6/9 vs KTOS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.0% | +1.3% | +27.9% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.3% | +1.0% | +8.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.8% | +1.4% | +10.1% | -9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.0% | +1.5% | +10.8% | -9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.09x | 1.63x | 9.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | -$381M | $1.5B | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $561M | $503M | $10.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $231M | $180M | $2.0B | $54.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.52x | 6.16x | 10.88x | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KTOS and BWXT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWXT five years ago would be worth $32,491 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,145 for RDW. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +95.6% total return vs RDW's -17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs BA's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -28.1% | +15.5% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.6% | +58.1% | +95.6% | +24.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.7% | +331.5% | +226.8% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | +110.3% | +224.9% | -1.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.6% | +1231.8% | +551.5% | +94.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.2% | +62.8% | +48.4% | +5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BA is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RDW's 3.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs RDW's 41.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.20x | 1.84x | 1.60x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.25 | $134.00 | $241.82 | $254.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.87 | $32.85 | $105.07 | $176.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.3% | +42.5% | +86.8% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 38.8 | 48.5 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20.1M | 4.3M | 1.0M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BWXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RDW as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy", BWXT as "Buy", BA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 94.0% upside for KTOS (target: $111) vs 0.1% for BWXT (target: $210). For income investors, BWXT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.48% vs BA's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.20 | $110.58 | $210.00 | $263.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 22 | 16 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.01 | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
BWXT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
RDW vs KTOS vs BWXT vs BA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 3% for Redwire Corporation (RDW). BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) offers the better valuation at 58. 4x trailing P/E (45. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Redwire Corporation (RDW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA?
On trailing P/E, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the cheapest at 58. 4x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, BWX Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 45. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA?
Over the past 5 years, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) delivered a total return of +224. 9%, compared to -8. 5% for Redwire Corporation (RDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1232% versus RDW's -11. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boeing Company (BA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Redwire Corporation's 3. 20β — meaning RDW is approximately 230% more volatile than BA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus 10. 3% for Redwire Corporation (RDW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to 3. 0% for Redwire Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDW leads at 27. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA?
BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 3% net margin versus -67. 6% for Redwire Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWXT leads at 10. 1% versus -68. 5% for RDW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWXT leads at 22. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) trades at 45. 5x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4933. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 94. 0% to $110. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA?
In this comparison, BWXT (0.
5% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. RDW, KTOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RDW or KTOS or BWXT or BA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97)). Redwire Corporation (RDW) carries a higher beta of 3. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BA: +94. 6%, RDW: -11. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RDW and KTOS and BWXT and BA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RDW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.