Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RDW vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
RDW vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $39.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $371M | $6.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-300M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 9.2% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -76.8% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $231M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $2.70B |
RDW vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwire Corporation (RDW) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 66.2 | -33.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RDW vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RDW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -11.6% 10Y total return vs RKT's -20.7%
RKT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.77
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth -123.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.77, current ratio 16.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% NII/revenue growth vs RDW's 10.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.0% margin vs RDW's -80.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.77 vs RDW's 3.20 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.6% vs RDW's -17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.2% ROA vs RDW's -20.3%, ROIC 2.0% vs -27.8% |
RDW vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RDW vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 18.5x RDW's $371M. RKT is the more profitable business, keeping -1.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RDW's -80.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $371M | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$244M | $639M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$300M | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | -$4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -76.8% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -80.9% | -1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | -58.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -89.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RKT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $39.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.04x | -282.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 41.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.53x | 5.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RKT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RKT delivers a -0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-29 for RDW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDW scores 4/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.0% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.3% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.8% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.0% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $231M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.52x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RDW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDW five years ago would be worth $9,145 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,811 for RKT. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +21.6% total return vs RDW's -17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RDW at 44.2% vs RKT's 21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.6% | +21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.7% | +77.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | -11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.6% | -20.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.2% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
RKT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RDW's 3.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RKT currently trades 58.0% from its 52-week high vs RDW's 41.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.20x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.25 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.87 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.3% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20.1M | 25.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RDW as "Buy" and RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for RDW (target: $14) vs 53.1% for RKT (target: $22).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.20 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.2% | 0.0% |
RKT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RDW leads in 1 (Total Returns).
RDW vs RKT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RDW or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 3% for Redwire Corporation (RDW). Analysts rate Redwire Corporation (RDW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RDW or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, Redwire Corporation (RDW) delivered a total return of -8.
5%, compared to -11. 9% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDW returned -11. 6% versus RKT's -20. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RDW or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 77β versus Redwire Corporation's 3. 20β — meaning RDW is approximately 80% more volatile than RKT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — RDW or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus 10. 3% for Redwire Corporation (RDW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Redwire Corporation grew EPS 3. 0% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RDW or RKT?
Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 0% net margin versus -67. 6% for Redwire Corporation — meaning it keeps -1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 8. 7% versus -68. 5% for RDW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RDW or RKT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RDW: 54.
3% to $14. 20.
07Which pays a better dividend — RDW or RKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RDW or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Redwire Corporation (RDW) carries a higher beta of 3. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RKT: -20. 7%, RDW: -11. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RDW and RKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (RDW (Industrials) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RDW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.