REAX vs RKT

For growth investors, The Real Brokerage Inc.

(REAX) is the stronger pick with 55. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 34. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) offers the better valuation at 67. 1x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Real Brokerage Inc. (REAX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, The Real Brokerage Inc.

(REAX) delivered a total return of +8. 5%, compared to -30. 3% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REAX returned +338. 1% versus RKT's -20. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Real Brokerage Inc.

(REAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 60β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 11% more volatile than REAX relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Real Brokerage Inc.

(REAX) is pulling ahead at 55. 7% versus 34. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -0. 4% for The Real Brokerage Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 12. 4% versus -0. 4% for REAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REAX: 108.

3% to $4. 25.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Real Brokerage Inc.

(REAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+338. 1% 10Y return). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REAX: +338. 1%, RKT: -20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (REAX (Real Estate) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.