Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
REBN vs QSR vs MCD vs WEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
REBN vs QSR vs MCD vs WEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $14M | $27.62B | $196.01B | $1.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $9.59B | $27.45B | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $955M | $8.68B | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 33.1% | 57.4% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -162.8% | 25.1% | 46.0% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.6x | 21.0x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $17.58B | $54.81B | $4.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $158K | $1.16B | $774M | $301M |
REBN vs QSR vs MCD vs WEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reborn Coffee, Inc. (REBN) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| Restaurant Brands I… (QSR) | 100 | 135.1 | +35.1% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 109.3 | +9.3% |
| The Wendy's Company (WEN) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REBN vs QSR vs MCD vs WEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REBN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 42.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.5%
QSR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, current ratio 0.98x
- 12.2% revenue growth vs WEN's -3.1%
- +21.8% vs WEN's -35.1%
MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- 151.6% 10Y total return vs QSR's 133.5%
- 31.6% margin vs REBN's -191.5%
- Beta 0.12 vs REBN's 1.80
WEN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.23 vs QSR's 2.46
- Beta 0.51, yield 9.1%, current ratio 1.76x
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 21.0x), PEG 1.23 vs 1.54
- 9.1% yield, vs MCD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% revenue growth vs WEN's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 21.0x), PEG 1.23 vs 1.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.6% margin vs REBN's -191.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs REBN's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | 9.1% yield, vs MCD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs WEN's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs REBN's -205.9%, ROIC 18.7% vs -49.0% |
REBN vs QSR vs MCD vs WEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
REBN vs QSR vs MCD vs WEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories
WEN leads 1 • QSR leads 1 • REBN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 4119.1x REBN's $7M. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REBN's -191.5%. On growth, MCD holds the edge at +9.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $9.6B | $27.4B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $2.6B | $14.8B | $422M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $955M | $8.7B | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $1.5B | $7.0B | $222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +33.1% | +57.4% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -162.8% | +25.1% | +46.0% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -191.5% | +10.0% | +31.6% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -81.0% | +15.8% | +25.6% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.8% | +7.3% | +9.4% | -56.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -126.7% | +102.1% | +6.9% | -36.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WEN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, WEN trades at a 75% valuation discount to QSR's 33.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WEN offers better value at 0.83x vs QSR's 4.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $27.6B | $196.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $44.0B | $250.1B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.47x | 33.92x | 23.08x | 8.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.62x | 20.96x | 12.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.24x | 1.69x | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.89x | 17.19x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.44x | 2.93x | 7.29x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.72x | 7.06x | — | 12.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.06x | 27.28x | 5.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEN delivers a 150.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $151 in annual profit, vs $-3 for REBN. REBN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEN's 35.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCD scores 7/9 vs WEN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +18.4% | — | +150.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +3.8% | +14.5% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.0% | +8.2% | +18.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -88.5% | +9.9% | +23.3% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 3.41x | — | 35.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $16.4B | $54.0B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $158,215 | $1.2B | $774M | $301M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $17.6B | $54.8B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.60x | 3.65x | 7.92x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QSR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QSR five years ago would be worth $13,185 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $635 for REBN. Over the past 12 months, QSR leads with a +21.8% total return vs WEN's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QSR at 6.2% vs REBN's -31.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.9% | +18.5% | -8.5% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.0% | +21.8% | -9.7% | -35.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | +19.8% | -0.1% | -56.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.6% | +31.9% | +29.6% | -51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.6% | +133.5% | +151.6% | +14.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.0% | +6.2% | -0.0% | -24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QSR and MCD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REBN's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QSR currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs WEN's 58.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 0.35x | 0.12x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.45 | $81.96 | $341.75 | $12.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.36 | $61.33 | $274.83 | $6.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.7% | +97.3% | +80.7% | +58.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 53.4 | 30.5 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 3.3M | 3.0M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MCD and WEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QSR as "Buy", MCD as "Buy", WEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.0% upside for MCD (target: $347) vs 5.0% for QSR (target: $84). For income investors, WEN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.15% vs MCD's 2.59%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $83.73 | $347.33 | $7.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 62 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% | +2.6% | +9.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 | 27 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.42 | $7.14 | $0.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +14.4% |
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
REBN vs QSR vs MCD vs WEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for The Wendy's Company (WEN). The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN?
On trailing P/E, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the cheapest at 8.
6x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. at 33. 9x. On forward P/E, The Wendy's Company is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Wendy's Company wins at 1. 23x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 2. 46x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN?
Over the past 5 years, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) delivered a total return of +31. 9%, compared to -93. 6% for Reborn Coffee, Inc. (REBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +151. 6% versus REBN's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Reborn Coffee, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning REBN is approximately 1429% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reborn Coffee, Inc. (REBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 148% versus 35% for The Wendy's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -3. 1% for The Wendy's Company (WEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reborn Coffee, Inc. grew EPS 42. 0% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for Restaurant Brands International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REBN leads at 37. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN?
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus -81. 1% for Reborn Coffee, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus -77. 9% for REBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REBN leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 23x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 2. 46x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, The Wendy's Company (WEN) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for McDonald's Corporation — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MCD: 26. 0% to $347. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN?
In this comparison, WEN (9.
1% yield), QSR (3. 0% yield), MCD (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. REBN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is REBN or QSR or MCD or WEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +151. 6% 10Y return). Reborn Coffee, Inc. (REBN) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +151. 6%, REBN: -93. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REBN and QSR and MCD and WEN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: REBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; MCD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. QSR, MCD, WEN pay a dividend while REBN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.