Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RERE vs CPRT vs EBAY vs LQDT vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Integrated Freight & Logistics
RERE vs CPRT vs EBAY vs LQDT vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $32.77B | $48.63B | $1.12B | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.54B | $4.61B | $11.60B | $480M | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $1.56B | $2.04B | $30M | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 20.5% | 45.3% | 72.0% | 23.2% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 36.5% | 19.6% | 8.4% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | 21.5x | 17.4x | 24.3x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $104M | $7.38B | $14M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.97B | $2.78B | $1.87B | $175M | $5.89B |
RERE vs CPRT vs EBAY vs LQDT vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATRenew Inc. (RERE) | 100 | 30.2 | -69.8% |
| Copart, Inc. (CPRT) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 151.6 | +51.6% |
| Liquidity Services,… (LQDT) | 100 | 142.4 | +42.4% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 48.1 | -51.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RERE vs CPRT vs EBAY vs LQDT vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RERE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth 94.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 24.3x)
- +97.4% vs CPRT's -44.7%
CPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs LQDT's 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
- Beta 0.52, current ratio 8.25x
- 33.8% margin vs RERE's 1.1%
Among these 5 stocks, EBAY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LQDT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 31.2% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5%
UPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- PEG 0.42 vs CPRT's 1.28
- 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.2% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.8% margin vs RERE's 1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs RERE's 1.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.4% vs CPRT's -44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs RERE's 4.0%, ROIC 20.1% vs 1.0% |
RERE vs CPRT vs EBAY vs LQDT vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RERE vs CPRT vs EBAY vs LQDT vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
RERE leads 1 • UPS leads 1 • EBAY leads 0 • LQDT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 184.1x LQDT's $480M. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RERE's 1.1%. On growth, RERE holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.5B | $4.6B | $11.6B | $480M | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $501M | $1.9B | $2.6B | $51M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $1.6B | $2.0B | $30M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.4B | $1.7B | $78M | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +45.3% | +72.0% | +23.2% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +36.5% | +19.6% | +8.4% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +33.8% | +17.6% | +6.3% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +30.5% | +14.5% | +16.2% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.2% | -3.6% | +19.5% | +3.7% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | -10.0% | +5.7% | +4.5% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
RERE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 63% valuation discount to LQDT's 41.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs CPRT's 1.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $32.8B | $48.6B | $1.1B | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $858M | $30.1B | $54.1B | $964M | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -907.40x | 21.30x | 24.52x | 41.67x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.46x | 21.49x | 17.40x | 24.33x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.26x | — | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.11x | 15.73x | 21.03x | 21.19x | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 7.05x | 4.38x | 2.36x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 3.60x | 10.61x | 5.78x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.79x | 26.62x | 29.28x | 19.07x | 17.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $6 for RERE. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RERE scores 7/9 vs UPS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +15.9% | +44.1% | +14.2% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +14.7% | +11.5% | +8.0% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +20.1% | +16.8% | +60.8% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +19.7% | +17.4% | +17.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.01x | 1.60x | 0.07x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | -$2.7B | $5.5B | -$160M | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $2.8B | $1.9B | $175M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $104M | $7.4B | $14M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.67x | — | 10.52x | — | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EBAY and LQDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,684 for RERE. Over the past 12 months, RERE leads with a +97.4% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LQDT at 37.0% vs UPS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | -10.3% | +22.6% | +22.5% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.4% | -44.7% | +54.2% | +15.0% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.9% | -14.7% | +137.4% | +157.1% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | +8.8% | +86.3% | +47.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | +527.2% | +369.5% | +508.2% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | -5.2% | +33.4% | +37.0% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPRT and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RERE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EBAY currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs CPRT's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.52x | 0.73x | 0.76x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.47 | $63.85 | $111.38 | $38.83 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $32.20 | $67.87 | $21.67 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +53.0% | +95.5% | +93.4% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 47.5 | 63.1 | 81.6 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 7.8M | 5.4M | 159K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RERE as "Buy", CPRT as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", LQDT as "Buy", UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.4% upside for LQDT (target: $44) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, UPS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.34% vs EBAY's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.50 | $109.67 | $44.00 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 19 | 68 | 14 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 7 | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.15 | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | 0.0% | +5.1% | +1.4% | +1.2% |
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RERE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RERE vs CPRT vs EBAY vs LQDT vs UPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is the stronger pick with 31. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATRenew Inc. (RERE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Liquidity Services, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, ATRenew Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Copart, Inc. 's 1. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -73. 2% for ATRenew Inc. (RERE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +527. 2% versus RERE's -73. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus ATRenew Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RERE is approximately 162% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liquidity Services, Inc.
(LQDT) is pulling ahead at 31. 2% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATRenew Inc. grew EPS 94. 7% year-over-year, compared to -3. 0% for United Parcel Service, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RERE leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS?
Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus -0. 1% for ATRenew Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus 0. 2% for RERE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Copart, Inc. 's 1. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ATRenew Inc. (RERE) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Liquidity Services, Inc. — 22. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LQDT: 21. 4% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. RERE, CPRT, LQDT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RERE or CPRT or EBAY or LQDT or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, RERE: -73. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RERE and CPRT and EBAY and LQDT and UPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (RERE (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRT (Industrials) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and LQDT (Consumer Cyclical) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RERE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LQDT is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EBAY, UPS pay a dividend while RERE, CPRT, LQDT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.