Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs JD vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Medical - Care Facilities
Specialty Retail
Integrated Freight & Logistics
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs JD vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Medical - Care Facilities | Specialty Retail | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $48.63B | $78K | $46.46B | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.54B | $11.60B | $23K | $1.30T | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $2.04B | $-10M | $32.20B | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 20.5% | 72.0% | -18.4% | 12.7% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 19.6% | -398.1% | 1.3% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | 17.4x | — | 1.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $7.38B | $0.00 | $89.77B | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.97B | $1.87B | $504K | $108.35B | $5.89B |
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs JD vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATRenew Inc. (RERE) | 100 | 30.2 | -69.8% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 151.6 | +51.6% |
| IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 48.1 | -51.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs JD vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RERE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth 94.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- 25.9% revenue growth vs BACK's -98.6%
- +97.4% vs JD's -7.7%
EBAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 369.5% 10Y total return vs JD's 48.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 1.10x
- 17.6% margin vs BACK's -426.9%
- 11.5% ROA vs BACK's -31.3%
BACK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.05, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.05 vs RERE's 1.36
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UPS's 6.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
JD is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.05 vs UPS's 0.42
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.05 vs 0.42
Among these 5 stocks, UPS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.9% revenue growth vs BACK's -98.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.05 vs 0.42 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs BACK's -426.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs RERE's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UPS's 6.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.4% vs JD's -7.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs BACK's -31.3% |
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs JD vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs JD vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories
JD leads 1 • RERE leads 0 • BACK leads 0 • UPS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 57377415.0x BACK's $22,723. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BACK's -426.9%. On growth, RERE holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.5B | $11.6B | $22,723 | $1.30T | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $501M | $2.6B | -$9M | $23.8B | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $2.0B | -$10M | $32.2B | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.7B | -$5M | $9.1B | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +72.0% | -18.4% | +12.7% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +19.6% | -398.1% | +1.3% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +17.6% | -426.9% | +2.5% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +14.5% | -215.1% | +0.7% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.2% | +19.5% | -62.3% | +14.9% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +5.7% | +26.3% | -56.3% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
JD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, JD trades at a 69% valuation discount to EBAY's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JD offers better value at 0.29x vs UPS's 0.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $48.6B | $77,541 | $46.5B | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $858M | $54.1B | -$426,648 | $43.7B | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -907.40x | 24.52x | -0.00x | 7.64x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.46x | 17.40x | — | 1.43x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.29x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.11x | 21.03x | — | 6.40x | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 4.38x | 1.08x | 0.27x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 10.61x | — | 1.01x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.79x | 29.28x | — | 7.14x | 17.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $6 for RERE. RERE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RERE scores 7/9 vs BACK's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +44.1% | — | +10.5% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +11.5% | -31.3% | +4.6% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +16.8% | — | +9.9% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +17.4% | — | +10.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 1.60x | — | 0.29x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $5.5B | -$504,189 | -$18.6B | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $1.9B | $504,189 | $108.3B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $7.4B | $0 | $89.8B | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.67x | 10.52x | -28.20x | 12.85x | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBAY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for BACK. Over the past 12 months, RERE leads with a +97.4% total return vs JD's -7.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBAY at 33.4% vs BACK's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | +22.6% | -69.7% | +5.7% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.4% | +54.2% | +19.4% | -7.7% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.9% | +137.4% | -99.2% | -8.2% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | +86.3% | -99.9% | -53.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | +369.5% | -100.0% | +48.7% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +33.4% | -80.2% | -2.8% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EBAY and BACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BACK is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RERE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EBAY currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs BACK's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.73x | 0.05x | 1.06x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.47 | $111.38 | $0.21 | $38.08 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $67.87 | $0.03 | $24.51 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +95.5% | +18.2% | +79.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 63.1 | 40.2 | 58.0 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 5.4M | 3K | 10.1M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BACK and UPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RERE as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", JD as "Buy", UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for UPS (target: $115) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, BACK offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs EBAY's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.67 | — | $32.86 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 68 | — | 45 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +100.0% | +2.6% | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | $0.80 | $5.37 | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +5.1% | 0.0% | +8.2% | +1.2% |
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs JD vs UPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ATRenew Inc.
(RERE) is the stronger pick with 25. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). JD. com, Inc. (JD) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATRenew Inc. (RERE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS?
On trailing P/E, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus eBay Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JD. com, Inc. wins at 0. 05x versus United Parcel Service, Inc. 's 0. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -99. 9% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBAY returned +369. 5% versus BACK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IMAC Holdings, Inc.
(BACK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus ATRenew Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RERE is approximately 2874% more volatile than BACK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ATRenew Inc. (RERE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATRenew Inc.
(RERE) is pulling ahead at 25. 9% versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATRenew Inc. grew EPS 94. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for IMAC Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RERE leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -125. 5% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -78. 0% for BACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JD. com, Inc. (JD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 05x versus United Parcel Service, Inc. 's 0. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JD. com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for eBay Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPS: 15. 1% to $115. 23.
08Which pays a better dividend — RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS?
In this comparison, BACK (100.
0% yield), UPS (6. 3% yield), JD (2. 6% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. RERE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or JD or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IMAC Holdings, Inc.
(BACK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BACK: -100. 0%, RERE: -73. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RERE and EBAY and BACK and JD and UPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (RERE (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and BACK (Healthcare) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RERE is a small-cap high-growth stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EBAY, BACK, JD, UPS pay a dividend while RERE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.