Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RERE vs JD vs BABA vs EBAY vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
RERE vs JD vs BABA vs EBAY vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $46.46B | $340.44B | $48.63B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.54B | $1.30T | $1.01T | $11.60B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $32.20B | $123.35B | $2.04B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 20.5% | 12.7% | 41.2% | 72.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 1.3% | 10.9% | 19.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | 1.4x | 4.2x | 17.6x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $89.77B | $248.49B | $7.38B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.97B | $108.35B | $181.73B | $1.87B | $86.81B |
RERE vs JD vs BABA vs EBAY vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATRenew Inc. (RERE) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 37.8 | -62.2% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 61.8 | -38.2% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 158.5 | +58.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RERE vs JD vs BABA vs EBAY vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RERE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth 94.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 9.6%, current ratio 3.19x
- 25.9% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9%
- +97.4% vs JD's -7.7%
JD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.05 vs AMZN's 1.12
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.05 vs 1.12
Among these 5 stocks, BABA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EBAY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and stability.
- 17.6% margin vs RERE's 1.1%
- Beta 0.73 vs AMZN's 1.51
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
- 11.5% ROA vs RERE's 4.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.9% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.05 vs 1.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs RERE's 1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.4% vs JD's -7.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs RERE's 4.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 1.0% |
RERE vs JD vs BABA vs EBAY vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RERE vs JD vs BABA vs EBAY vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 1 of 6 categories
JD leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • RERE leads 0 • BABA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 112.4x EBAY's $11.6B. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RERE's 1.1%. On growth, RERE holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.5B | $1.30T | $1.01T | $11.6B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $501M | $23.8B | $114.6B | $2.6B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $32.2B | $123.4B | $2.0B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $9.1B | $2.6B | $1.7B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +12.7% | +41.2% | +72.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +1.3% | +10.9% | +19.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +2.5% | +12.2% | +17.6% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +0.7% | +0.3% | +14.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.2% | +14.9% | +4.8% | +19.5% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | -56.3% | -52.0% | +5.7% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
JD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, JD trades at a 80% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JD offers better value at 0.29x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $46.5B | $340.4B | $48.6B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $858M | $43.7B | $350.3B | $54.1B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -907.40x | 7.64x | 17.90x | 24.52x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.53x | 1.43x | 4.16x | 17.62x | 31.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.11x | 6.40x | 13.55x | 21.03x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.27x | 2.33x | 4.38x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 1.01x | 2.12x | 10.61x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.79x | 7.14x | 29.64x | 29.28x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RERE and EBAY each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $6 for RERE. RERE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RERE scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +10.5% | +11.2% | +44.1% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +4.6% | +6.7% | +11.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +9.9% | +9.6% | +16.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +10.2% | +10.4% | +17.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.29x | 0.23x | 1.60x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | -$18.6B | $66.8B | $5.5B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $108.3B | $181.7B | $1.9B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $89.8B | $248.5B | $7.4B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.67x | 12.85x | 15.74x | 10.52x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,684 for RERE. Over the past 12 months, RERE leads with a +97.4% total return vs JD's -7.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs JD's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | +5.7% | -9.5% | +22.6% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.4% | -7.7% | +16.0% | +54.2% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.9% | -8.2% | +74.8% | +137.4% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | -53.8% | -35.4% | +86.3% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | +48.7% | +83.4% | +369.5% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | -2.8% | +20.5% | +33.4% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EBAY and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs RERE's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.04x | 1.23x | 0.73x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.47 | $38.08 | $192.67 | $111.38 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $24.51 | $103.71 | $67.87 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +79.3% | +73.2% | +95.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 58.0 | 61.8 | 63.1 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 10.1M | 10.4M | 5.4M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JD and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RERE as "Buy", JD as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.8% upside for BABA (target: $194) vs 3.2% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs EBAY's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.86 | $194.23 | $109.87 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 45 | 59 | 68 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +1.3% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 2 | 7 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.37 | $12.14 | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +8.2% | +3.8% | +5.1% | 0.0% |
EBAY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). JD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
RERE vs JD vs BABA vs EBAY vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ATRenew Inc.
(RERE) is the stronger pick with 25. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). JD. com, Inc. (JD) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATRenew Inc. (RERE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JD. com, Inc. wins at 0. 05x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -73. 2% for ATRenew Inc. (RERE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus RERE's -71. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning AMZN is approximately 105% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ATRenew Inc. (RERE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATRenew Inc.
(RERE) is pulling ahead at 25. 9% versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATRenew Inc. grew EPS 94. 7% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for eBay Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RERE leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -0. 1% for ATRenew Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus 0. 2% for RERE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JD. com, Inc. (JD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 05x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JD. com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 30. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BABA: 37. 8% to $194. 23.
08Which pays a better dividend — RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. RERE, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RERE or JD or BABA or EBAY or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +374. 6%, RERE: -71. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RERE and JD and BABA and EBAY and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RERE is a small-cap high-growth stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. JD, BABA, EBAY pay a dividend while RERE, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.