Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RETO vs PESI vs CWST vs CLH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Waste Management
Waste Management
RETO vs PESI vs CWST vs CLH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Waste Management | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $356K | $207M | $5.35B | $15.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $59M | $1.88B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $-18M | $7M | $395M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 4.1% | 17.4% | 30.0% |
| Operating Margin | -237.8% | -26.3% | 4.5% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 63.9x | 33.4x |
| Total Debt | $110K | $4M | $1.24B | $3.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $671K | $12M | $124M | $826M |
RETO vs PESI vs CWST vs CLH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
| Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) | 100 | 474.9 | +374.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RETO vs PESI vs CWST vs CLH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RETO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
CLH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 496.4% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
- Beta 0.70, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (33.4x vs 63.9x)
- 6.5% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.4x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs RETO's -291.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.7% vs RETO's -95.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 9.8% vs -14.5% |
RETO vs PESI vs CWST vs CLH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RETO vs PESI vs CWST vs CLH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLH leads in 4 of 6 categories
RETO leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 699.7x RETO's $9M. CLH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $59M | $1.9B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$14M | $414M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | -$18M | $7M | $395M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$14M | $102M | $467M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +4.1% | +17.4% | +30.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -26.3% | +4.5% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -30.1% | +0.4% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -77.8% | -23.4% | +5.5% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.0% | -20.1% | +9.6% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.8% | -110.5% | -18.6% | +9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CLH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.7x trailing earnings, CLH trades at a 95% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLH's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $355,799 | $207M | $5.4B | $15.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$205,956 | $200M | $6.5B | $17.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -14.89x | 712.08x | 38.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 63.93x | 33.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.74x | 15.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 3.36x | 2.91x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 4.11x | 3.46x | 5.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 63.17x | 34.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLH's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RETO scores 5/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -183.4% | -34.5% | +0.5% | +14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -75.1% | -20.2% | +0.2% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.5% | -21.7% | +2.6% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.6% | -16.7% | +2.9% | +10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.09x | 0.79x | 1.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$561,755 | -$7M | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $671,355 | $12M | $124M | $826M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109,600 | $4M | $1.2B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.78x | -42.14x | 1.12x | 6.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLH five years ago would be worth $29,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, CLH leads with a +26.7% total return vs RETO's -95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLH at 27.3% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.1% | -8.8% | -13.4% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.9% | +26.2% | -28.9% | +26.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +21.7% | -6.3% | +106.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +45.6% | +25.7% | +198.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +178.6% | +1059.4% | +496.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.0% | +6.8% | -2.2% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWST and CLH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLH currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.85x | 0.32x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.55 | $16.50 | $121.24 | $316.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $8.02 | $74.05 | $201.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.3% | +67.7% | +70.5% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 41.5 | 52.8 | 37.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 920K | 164K | 874K | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy", CLH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 6.1% for CLH (target: $299).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $119.00 | $299.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 19 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% |
CLH leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
RETO vs PESI vs CWST vs CLH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH?
On trailing P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) is the cheapest at 38. 7x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH?
Over the past 5 years, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) delivered a total return of +198. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 472% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 126% for Clean Harbors, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH?
Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLH leads at 11. 2% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) trades at 33. 4x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 30. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RETO or PESI or CWST or CLH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RETO and PESI and CWST and CLH?
These companies operate in different sectors (RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials) and CLH (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.