Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
REVG vs ASTE vs CMI vs WNC vs PCAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
REVG vs ASTE vs CMI vs WNC vs PCAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $3.12B | $1.21B | $94.29B | $317M | $60.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.40B | $1.48B | $33.89B | $1.47B | $27.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $108M | $26M | $2.67B | $-65M | $2.48B |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 26.1% | 25.4% | 2.0% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 3.7% | 11.2% | -3.1% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | 14.2x | 25.9x | 1.5x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $320M | $8.11B | $443M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $72M | $2.85B | $32M | $9.25B |
REVG vs ASTE vs CMI vs WNC vs PCAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| REV Group, Inc. (REVG) | 100 | 1047.5 | +947.5% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 114.7 | +14.7% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 341.3 | +241.3% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| PACCAR Inc (PCAR) | 100 | 249.6 | +149.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REVG vs ASTE vs CMI vs WNC vs PCAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REVG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 13.5%, current ratio 1.51x
- 8.9% ROA vs WNC's -5.0%, ROIC 29.9% vs 37.4%
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
CMI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 1.1%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs REVG's 174.2%
- +131.7% vs WNC's +0.4%
WNC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 25.9x)
- 4.2% yield, vs CMI's 1.1%
PCAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 1.58 vs CMI's 2.30
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.70x
- 9.1% margin vs WNC's -4.4%
- Beta 1.01 vs WNC's 1.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs WNC's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs WNC's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs CMI's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.7% vs WNC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs WNC's -5.0%, ROIC 29.9% vs 37.4% |
REVG vs ASTE vs CMI vs WNC vs PCAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
REVG vs ASTE vs CMI vs WNC vs PCAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
REVG leads 1 • ASTE leads 0 • CMI leads 0 • PCAR leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ASTE and PCAR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.9B annually — 23.1x WNC's $1.5B. PCAR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNC's -4.4%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $1.5B | $33.9B | $1.5B | $27.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $84M | $4.6B | -$2M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | $26M | $2.7B | -$65M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $200M | $44M | $2.7B | -$38M | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +26.1% | +25.4% | +2.0% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +3.7% | +11.2% | -3.1% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +1.7% | +7.9% | -4.4% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +3.0% | +7.9% | -2.6% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | +20.3% | +2.7% | -20.4% | -16.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.6% | -90.3% | -21.0% | -120.7% | +19.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 95% valuation discount to REVG's 33.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PCAR offers better value at 2.00x vs CMI's 2.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $1.2B | $94.3B | $317M | $60.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $1.5B | $99.6B | $728M | $50.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.81x | 31.55x | 33.29x | 1.54x | 25.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.18x | 14.17x | 25.92x | — | 19.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.95x | — | 2.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.35x | 14.36x | 20.03x | 1.92x | 13.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 0.86x | 2.80x | 0.21x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.73x | 1.80x | 7.06x | 0.88x | 3.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.41x | 56.50x | 39.52x | — | 19.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WNC. REVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WNC's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs PCAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | +3.8% | +20.3% | -17.3% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +2.0% | +7.8% | -5.0% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.9% | +6.2% | +16.1% | +37.4% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.0% | +7.2% | +17.3% | +32.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.47x | 0.61x | 1.20x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $248M | $5.3B | $411M | -$9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $72M | $2.8B | $32M | $9.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $320M | $8.1B | $443M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.03x | 5.48x | 12.15x | -0.97x | 129.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — REVG and CMI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $36,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,154 for WNC. Over the past 12 months, CMI leads with a +131.7% total return vs WNC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +19.0% | +31.1% | -11.0% | +2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.3% | +40.5% | +131.7% | +0.4% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +535.6% | +31.7% | +214.6% | -63.9% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +261.2% | -20.4% | +168.7% | -48.5% | +105.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.2% | +22.1% | +557.4% | -22.6% | +269.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.2% | +9.6% | +46.5% | -28.8% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMI and PCAR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMI currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs WNC's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.63x | 1.57x | 1.93x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.92 | $65.65 | $718.08 | $12.94 | $131.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.96 | $36.43 | $296.59 | $7.10 | $88.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +80.7% | +95.0% | +60.3% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 39.1 | 75.7 | 37.7 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 227K | 794K | 598K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMI and WNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REVG as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy", CMI as "Buy", WNC as "Hold", PCAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs REVG's 0.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $36.00 | $621.10 | $17.50 | $124.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 51 | 18 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +4.2% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $0.51 | $7.61 | $0.33 | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +10.6% | +0.1% |
WNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). REVG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
REVG vs ASTE vs CMI vs WNC vs PCAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus REV Group, Inc. at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, Astec Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PACCAR Inc wins at 1. 58x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 30x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR?
Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -48. 5% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMI returned +557. 4% versus WNC's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 91% more volatile than PCAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 120% for Wabash National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -60. 0% for REV Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMI leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus 2. 8% for Astec Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus 4. 6% for ASTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTE leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 58x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 30x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Cummins Inc. — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124. 4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 4% for REV Group, Inc. (REVG).
09Is REVG or ASTE or CMI or WNC or PCAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01), 3. 8% yield, +269. 8% 10Y return). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCAR: +269. 8%, WNC: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REVG and ASTE and CMI and WNC and PCAR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCAR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ASTE, CMI, WNC, PCAR pay a dividend while REVG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.