Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RGC vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NUVB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RGC
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$14.48B
5Y Perf.+12034.3%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.53B
5Y Perf.+41.0%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.84B
5Y Perf.+3.6%
NUVB
Nuvation Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.66B
5Y Perf.-44.6%

RGC vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NUVB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RGC logoRGC
PRAX logoPRAX
ACAD logoACAD
NUVB logoNUVB
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$14.48B$9.53B$3.84B$1.66B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$1.10B$143M
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$-327M$376M$-146M
Gross Margin91.5%91.6%
Operating Margin7.4%-105.0%
Forward P/E55.6x
Total Debt$86K$110K$52M$10M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$357M$178M$164M

RGC vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NUVBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RGC
PRAX
ACAD
NUVB
StockJul 21May 26Return
Regencell Bioscienc… (RGC)10012134.3+12034.3%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)100141.0+41.0%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)100103.6+3.6%
Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB)10055.4-44.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RGC vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NUVB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. NUVB also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RGC
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

RGC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 111.3% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 41.92x
  • Beta 1.37, current ratio 41.92x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +7.7% vs ACAD's +32.3%
Best for: momentum
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Income Pick

ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 1.11
  • 34.3% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
  • Beta 1.11 vs NUVB's 1.97
  • 26.2% ROA vs RGC's -60.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -43.8%
Best for: income & stability
NUVB
Nuvation Bio Inc.
The Growth Play

NUVB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
  • 7.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNUVB logoNUVB7.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
Stability / SafetyACAD logoACADBeta 1.11 vs NUVB's 1.97
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs ACAD's +32.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs RGC's -60.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -43.8%

RGC vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NUVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RGCRegencell Bioscience Holdings Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
NUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
FY 2025
License
60.8%$38M
Product
39.2%$25M

RGC vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NUVB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACADLAGGINGNUVB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ACAD and NUVB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUVB's -102.1%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRGC logoRGCRegencell Bioscie…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$1.1B$143M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M-$357M$96M-$145M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M-$327M$376M-$146M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$283M$212M-$126M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+91.5%+91.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.4%-105.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+34.3%-102.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.4%-88.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%+26.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.7%-81.8%+106.3%
Evenly matched — ACAD and NUVB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACAD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricRGC logoRGCRegencell Bioscie…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
Market CapShares × price$14.5B$9.5B$3.8B$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.5B$9.2B$3.7B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3365.52x-24.48x9.78x-7.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.55.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.58x26.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1761.63x8.46x3.13x5.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.48x
ACAD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-67 for RGC. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACAD's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricRGC logoRGCRegencell Bioscie…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-67.0%-43.0%+35.6%-44.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-60.2%-40.2%+26.2%-23.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-43.8%-65.0%+10.0%-54.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-46.8%-49.3%+10.1%-42.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94364
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.00x0.04x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M-$357M-$126M-$154M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$357M$178M$164M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$85,741$110,000$52M$10M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-162.11x
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RGC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RGC five years ago would be worth $1,059,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,343 for NUVB. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs ACAD's +32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RGC at 2.5% vs ACAD's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRGC logoRGCRegencell Bioscie…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+42.6%+15.2%-14.3%-44.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+424.7%+767.1%+32.3%+128.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4204.0%+1956.2%+3.9%+195.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10497.2%-14.9%+6.6%-56.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11134.2%-20.9%-23.4%-52.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.5%+174.0%+1.3%+43.5%
RGC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 1.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs RGC's 35.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRGC logoRGCRegencell Bioscie…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.37x1.40x1.11x1.97x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$83.60$356.00$27.81$9.75
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.30$35.21$14.68$1.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+35.0%+92.7%+80.5%+49.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.653.353.852.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded140K376K1.7M4.3M
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: RGC as "Hold", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", NUVB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 158.9% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 55.3% for ACAD (target: $35).

MetricRGC logoRGCRegencell Bioscie…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$548.80$34.78$12.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts416379
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RGC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RGC vs PRAX vs ACAD vs NUVB: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.

(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB?

Over the past 5 years, Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) delivered a total return of +105.

0%, compared to -56. 6% for Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGC returned +111. 3% versus NUVB's -52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 1. 97β — meaning NUVB is approximately 77% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.

(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVB: 158.

9% to $12. 40.

07

Which pays a better dividend — RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is RGC or PRAX or ACAD or NUVB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11)). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACAD: -23. 4%, NUVB: -52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between RGC and PRAX and ACAD and NUVB?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RGC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RGC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NUVB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 1299%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.