REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RITM vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Mortgage
RITM vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $5.49B | $151.66B | $41.18B | $9.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.55B | $11.63B | $6.13B | $3.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $681M | $1.43B | $260M | $838M |
| Gross Margin | 92.2% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 45.6% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 107.1% |
| Forward P/E | 4.3x | 79.7x | 118.1x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $39.58B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $64M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.85B | $5.03B | $741M | $505M |
RITM vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 427.2 | +327.2% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.8 | +147.8% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 83.4 | -16.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RITM vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RITM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.9x)
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 233.9% 10Y total return vs RITM's 79.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
- +45.8% vs RITM's -3.0%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.01 vs RITM's 0.86, lower leverage
AGNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs VTR's 18.5%
- 24.2% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
- 14.6% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs VTR's 18.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.2% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs RITM's 0.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.8% vs RITM's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs AGNC's 0.8%, ROIC 0.5% vs 34.0% |
RITM vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RITM vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
RITM leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 3.4x AGNC's $3.5B. AGNC is the more profitable business, keeping 24.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, AGNC holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.6B | $11.6B | $6.1B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $2.8B | $2.3B | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $681M | $1.4B | $260M | $838M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $2.5B | $1.4B | $604M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.2% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +107.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +24.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +17.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.6% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -82.0% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +84.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RITM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, RITM trades at a 94% valuation discount to VTR's 160.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 67.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $151.7B | $41.2B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43.2B | $168.0B | $53.7B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.46x | 155.73x | 160.41x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.33x | 79.69x | 118.12x | 6.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.37x | 67.37x | 24.33x | 2.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 14.22x | 7.06x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.60x | 3.40x | 3.18x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.25x | 31.28x | 112.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGNC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RITM delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RITM's 4.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs RITM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +34.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.28x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $37.7B | $16.3B | $12.5B | -$441M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $5.0B | $741M | $505M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39.6B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $64M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.83x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 1.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,879 for AGNC. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +45.8% total return vs RITM's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 43.3% vs AGNC's 16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | +16.2% | +12.7% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.0% | +45.8% | +34.6% | +40.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +194.0% | +94.4% | +59.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | +211.9% | +77.4% | -1.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.1% | +233.9% | +66.5% | +47.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.3% | +43.3% | +24.8% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WELL and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RITM's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs RITM's 77.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.74 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $12.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.43 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $8.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.2% | +98.6% | +97.9% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 57.6 | 57.0 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.6M | 2.6M | 3.4M | 18.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WELL and AGNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RITM as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", AGNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for RITM (target: $14) vs 3.2% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, AGNC offers the higher dividend yield at 14.63% vs WELL's 1.28%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.63 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $11.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 34 | 32 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.6% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.58 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RITM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RITM vs WELL vs VTR vs AGNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 5% for Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC?
On trailing P/E, Rithm Capital Corp.
(RITM) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 4x. On forward P/E, Rithm Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 4. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +211. 9%, compared to -1. 2% for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +233. 9% versus AGNC's +47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Rithm Capital Corp. 's 0. 86β — meaning RITM is approximately 8933% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Rithm Capital Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus 18. 5% for Ventas, Inc. (VTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -37. 7% for Rithm Capital Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RITM leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC?
AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGNC leads at 79. 6% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rithm Capital Corp.
(RITM) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 118. 1x for Ventas, Inc. — 113. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RITM: 38. 5% to $13. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) offers the highest yield at 14. 6%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is RITM or WELL or VTR or AGNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +233. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +233. 9%, RITM: +79. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RITM and WELL and VTR and AGNC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.