Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RIVN vs GM vs F vs LCID vs STLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
RIVN vs GM vs F vs LCID vs STLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $17.59B | $71.05B | $48.30B | $2.09B | $22.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.53B | $184.62B | $189.86B | $1.12B | $337.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.52B | $2.54B | $-6.11B | $-3.36B | $-20.81B |
| Gross Margin | -1.7% | 6.1% | 9.2% | -145.0% | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -68.9% | 1.3% | 1.8% | -339.6% | -6.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.2x | 7.6x | — | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $6.65B | $130.28B | $167.57B | $861M | $45.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.58B | $20.95B | $23.36B | $998M | $30.15B |
RIVN vs GM vs F vs LCID vs STLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivian Automotive, … (RIVN) | 100 | 11.9 | -88.1% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 100 | 64.2 | -35.8% |
| Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Stellantis N.V. (STLA) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RIVN vs GM vs F vs LCID vs STLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, RIVN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 181.5% 10Y total return vs STLA's 142.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 1.17x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 10.2x)
- 1.4% margin vs LCID's -300.4%
F is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 6.1%
- Beta 1.04, yield 6.1%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 1.04 vs LCID's 1.98
LCID ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 67.6%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
- 67.6% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3%
STLA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 10.3% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.6% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs LCID's -300.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs LCID's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.8% vs LCID's -72.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs LCID's -40.0%, ROIC 1.3% vs -98.7% |
RIVN vs GM vs F vs LCID vs STLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RIVN vs GM vs F vs LCID vs STLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GM leads in 2 of 6 categories
F leads 1 • RIVN leads 0 • LCID leads 0 • STLA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
F leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $337.4B annually — 301.6x LCID's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.4% (GM) to -3.0% (LCID). On growth, STLA holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.5B | $184.6B | $189.9B | $1.1B | $337.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3.2B | $15.5B | $10.0B | -$3.6B | -$7.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.5B | $2.5B | -$6.1B | -$3.4B | -$20.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.5B | $12.5B | $11.9B | -$4.7B | -$21.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +6.1% | +9.2% | -145.0% | +5.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -68.9% | +1.3% | +1.8% | -3.4% | -6.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -63.6% | +1.4% | -3.2% | -3.0% | -6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.0% | +6.8% | +6.3% | -4.2% | -6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.4% | -0.9% | +6.4% | -100.0% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.3% | -15.2% | +4.3% | -44.2% | -156.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GM and F and STLA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GM's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than F's 22.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.6B | $71.1B | $48.3B | $2.1B | $22.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.7B | $180.4B | $192.5B | $2.0B | $41.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.63x | 24.10x | -5.98x | -0.52x | -0.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.23x | 7.63x | — | 10.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.31x | 22.58x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.27x | 0.38x | 0.26x | 1.55x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.67x | 1.21x | 1.36x | 2.77x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.42x | 3.87x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GM delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-193 for LCID. STLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs STLA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -69.6% | +3.8% | -14.7% | -193.0% | -28.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.5% | +0.9% | -2.1% | -40.0% | -10.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.7% | +1.3% | +1.0% | -98.7% | -25.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.5% | +1.6% | +1.4% | -49.2% | -21.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.45x | 2.06x | 4.66x | 1.20x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $109.3B | $144.2B | -$137M | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $20.9B | $23.4B | $998M | $30.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.7B | $130.3B | $167.6B | $861M | $45.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.31x | 2.60x | 0.93x | -146.67x | -7.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $14,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $340 for LCID. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +67.8% total return vs LCID's -72.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 33.6% vs LCID's -56.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.7% | -2.5% | -6.5% | -43.1% | -32.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | +67.8% | +25.7% | -72.6% | -21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +138.6% | +19.0% | -91.8% | -38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.9% | +40.3% | +35.4% | -96.6% | -29.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.9% | +181.5% | +37.3% | -93.6% | +142.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | +33.6% | +6.0% | -56.5% | -14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
F is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LCID's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs LCID's 18.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 1.09x | 1.04x | 1.98x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.69 | $87.62 | $14.80 | $33.70 | $12.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.57 | $46.09 | $9.88 | $5.62 | $6.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.7% | +89.9% | +83.3% | +18.8% | +63.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 54.3 | 49.6 | 33.3 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26.9M | 6.7M | 42.0M | 13.0M | 20.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GM and STLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RIVN as "Buy", GM as "Buy", F as "Hold", LCID as "Hold", STLA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.8% upside for LCID (target: $10) vs 13.3% for F (target: $14). For income investors, STLA offers the higher dividend yield at 10.29% vs GM's 0.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.36 | $93.92 | $13.96 | $9.50 | $10.76 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 51 | 46 | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +6.1% | — | +10.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 | $0.75 | — | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). F leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
RIVN vs GM vs F vs LCID vs STLA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lucid Group, Inc.
(LCID) is the stronger pick with 67. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24. 1x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA?
On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA?
Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +40.
3%, compared to -96. 6% for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +181. 5% versus LCID's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ford Motor Company (F) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus Lucid Group, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning LCID is approximately 91% more volatile than F relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stellantis N. V. (STLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Group, Inc.
(LCID) is pulling ahead at 67. 6% versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rivian Automotive, Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -594. 6% for Stellantis N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RIVN leads at 48. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA?
General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
5% net margin versus -199. 3% for Lucid Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1. 6% versus -258. 7% for LCID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — F leads at 12. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
2x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for Stellantis N. V. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCID: 49. 8% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA?
In this comparison, STLA (10.
3% yield), F (6. 1% yield), GM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. RIVN, LCID do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RIVN or GM or F or LCID or STLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 0. 9% yield, +181. 5% 10Y return). Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +181. 5%, LCID: -93. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RIVN and GM and F and LCID and STLA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RIVN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock; STLA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. GM, F, STLA pay a dividend while RIVN, LCID do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.