Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RLYB vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RLYB vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $83M | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $674K | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 95.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -56.8% | — |
| Total Debt | $154K | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $357M |
RLYB vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 142.4 | +42.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLYB vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLYB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.32
- Rev growth -18.4%, EPS growth 27.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 10.87x
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -20.1% 10Y total return vs RLYB's -87.0%
- 2.4% margin vs RLYB's -21.0%
- +7.7% vs RLYB's +5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -18.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs RLYB's -21.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs RLYB's +5.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -23.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC -69.8% vs -65.0% |
RLYB vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RLYB vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLYB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLYB and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $674,000 and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $674,000 | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -56.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RLYB and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $83M | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.38x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 129.83x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RLYB delivers a -25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RLYB's 0.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLYB scores 4/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.2% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.2% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.8% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.9% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154,000 | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $7,918 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,300 for RLYB. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RLYB's +510.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RLYB's -32.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +159.0% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +510.8% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.5% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.7% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
RLYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLYB is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.31 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.58 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 90.0 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 394K | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RLYB as "Buy" and PRAX as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RLYB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). PRAX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
RLYB vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLYB or PRAX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RLYB or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) delivered a total return of -20. 8%, compared to -87. 0% for Rallybio Corporation (RLYB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRAX returned -20. 1% versus RLYB's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RLYB or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 17% more volatile than RLYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 0% for Rallybio Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RLYB or PRAX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rallybio Corporation grew EPS 27.
7% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RLYB or PRAX?
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -90. 8% for Rallybio Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAX leads at 0. 0% versus -95. 1% for RLYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLYB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RLYB or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RLYB or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RLYB: -87. 0%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RLYB and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.