ROKU vs NFLX vs DIS vs FUBO

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roku, Inc. (ROKU) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.

8x versus Roku, Inc. at 216. 9x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +76. 7%, compared to -94. 9% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +872. 1% versus FUBO's -90. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Roku, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ROKU is approximately 439% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Roku, Inc. grew EPS 166. 3% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Roku, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -2. 6% for FUBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.

4x forward P/E versus 58. 1x for Roku, Inc. — 41. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 312. 3% to $43. 00.

In this comparison, DIS (0.

9% yield) pays a dividend. ROKU, NFLX, FUBO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, FUBO: -90. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ROKU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock. DIS pays a dividend while ROKU, NFLX, FUBO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.