ROL vs WSO vs FERG vs GWW

For growth investors, Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Watsco, Inc. (WSO). Ferguson plc (FERG) offers the better valuation at 26. 5x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ferguson plc (FERG) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the cheapest at 26.

5x versus Rollins, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Ferguson plc is actually cheaper at 21. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: W. W. Grainger, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Rollins, Inc. 's 2. 93x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, W.

W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) delivered a total return of +173. 2%, compared to +54. 0% for Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GWW returned +462. 8% versus WSO's +275. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Ferguson plc's 1. 19β — meaning FERG is approximately 415% more volatile than ROL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watsco, Inc. (WSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 102% for Ferguson plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -5. 0% for Watsco, Inc. (WSO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rollins, Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to -8. 6% for W. W. Grainger, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROL leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 0% net margin versus 6. 0% for Ferguson plc — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROL leads at 19. 4% versus 8. 5% for FERG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROL leads at 49. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, W. W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Rollins, Inc. 's 2. 93x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Ferguson plc (FERG) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Rollins, Inc. — 22. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROL: 17. 3% to $63. 75.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Watsco, Inc. (WSO) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 8% for W. W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rollins, Inc.

(ROL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 1. 2% yield, +378. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROL: +378. 0%, FERG: +364. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ROL (Consumer Cyclical) and WSO (Industrials) and FERG (Industrials) and GWW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.